Please don't take offense, but I really don't think that any of these shots make any of the ladies look especially good, except maybe the first two, and even these are not more than OK. I'm sure that the ladies themselves are very good looking in person, but photographing them to look more interesting or attractive would require better lighting, makeup and posing than what you have shown.
I hope I have not hurt anyone's feelings here, because I know how difficult criticism can feel; my work has been criticised many times by my clients, my assistants, my wife, my children, heck, even my own mother. It's never an easy thing to take, but I just thought I'd tell you that you may be on the wrong track here.
I don't know what your level of experience is, but the first thing I'd try if I were you is to look at lots of beauty shots in women's fashion magazines, slick men's magazines, and model comp books from model agencies. I think you'll get a better feel from seeing them as to how better to light people.
Some people think that photography is more the art of what you don't show, rather than what you do. Think of that in terms of lighting. If everything is evenly illuminated, nothing is important and many things that you'd rather not see are clearly visible. Or put another way, when you start thinking about lighting, don't start with the idea to illuminate everything, think about starting out with darkness and only add light to the places that will be most flattering or reveal what's most interesting, depending on what you are attempting to communicate. Just thought you'd like to know.
Good luck.
Regards,
David
Keep learning; share knowledge; think seriously about outcomes; seek wisdom.