Lesson #1: Our Boy Robert Frank

Camera Slug

Leading Member
Messages
573
Reaction score
0
Location
Boston, MA, US
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America, comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:

"...I do not anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement - the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
 
Thanks for the lesson CS!

I am actually quite inspired by Frank. His work is an example of why we need to jump out of our preconceived constructs of how to critique a photo. If we posted one of those images today on STF it would be hammered for being too noisy or blurry.

Thanks for moving us that way. And also for the real photo talk.

Jim
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
Jim Fuglestad - Stickin' with my 707
Why simply live and let live? Live and help live.
http://www.pbase.com/jfuglestad/galleries
 
this guy was obviously well ahead of his time for his photos to have the look and feel of a modern photo. no doubt his style is being adopted by so many young photographers and videographers.

and usually anyone so far ahead of their time got critically blasted for their work until much later.

thanks cs for the links... i was not really consciously aware of franks' work tho i'm sure i have seen it and maybe even been subconsciously influenced by it in some manner.
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
cUrVe (n. from the latin curvus, meaning bent)
... it is better to fail in originality than to succeed in imitation.
http://homepage.mac.com/curve
 
Thanks for sharing this. To me, the beauty of a photograph is either in technicality, or contents. Frank surely picked content to be his focus.
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
Lance
Happiness is not just to enjoy what you have but to want what you got.
 
It's interesting. He really angered some people. Critics thought he was crazy and had no idea of what America was about (being Swiss).

I like the fact that he wasn't always trying to capture people at their best. That's not the way life is. He didn't necessarily portray people at their worst either though. He just kind of portrayed them "being". I think that's what's interesting.
I am actually quite inspired by Frank. His work is an example of
why we need to jump out of our preconceived constructs of how to
critique a photo. If we posted one of those images today on STF it
would be hammered for being too noisy or blurry.

Thanks for moving us that way. And also for the real photo talk.

Jim
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
Jim Fuglestad - Stickin' with my 707
Why simply live and let live? Live and help live.
http://www.pbase.com/jfuglestad/galleries
--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
 
He's made me think that sometimes I really need to shoot and ask questions later.
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
cUrVe (n. from the latin curvus, meaning bent)
... it is better to fail in originality than to succeed in imitation.
http://homepage.mac.com/curve
--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
 
Slug,

You called it "Lesson #1" -- hopefully you will follow up on this one with others. It was great to talk about photography for a change.

Thanks.

---John
 
Another interesting thing he would do is take pictures that had extremely crooked horizon lines.

The reason...the focus of his pictures was the subject. He wanted to portray the subject in the best possible manner, thus not caring what the horizon line looked like.

Cool.
I am actually quite inspired by Frank. His work is an example of
why we need to jump out of our preconceived constructs of how to
critique a photo. If we posted one of those images today on STF it
would be hammered for being too noisy or blurry.

Thanks for moving us that way. And also for the real photo talk.

Jim
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
Jim Fuglestad - Stickin' with my 707
Why simply live and let live? Live and help live.
http://www.pbase.com/jfuglestad/galleries
--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
 
Frank's pictures broke all the rules of photography. Frank would
intentionally lose focus, his work was shadowy and grainy, full of
unconventional cropping and angles. He broke the rules in order to
be true to his vision of America he saw in his travels across the
country in 1955 and 1956. He actually went through 810 rolls of
film to get 81 shots for his "The Americas" book. That's ten rolls
of film for every photo selected!

Frank established a new iconography for contemporary America,
comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip
developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces.

Being a good friend of Jack Kerouac, he once picked up a couple
hitchhikers and offered to give them a ride only if they drove his
car and allowed him to take pictures out the window.

Most photojournalism made around the time Frank was photographing
The Americans was optimistic and upbeat, reflecting the attitude of
a prosperous post-war America. Frank's work clashed with the
prevailing trend in photography. In 1958 he wrote:
"...I do not
anticipate that the onlooker will share my viewpoint. However, I
feel that if my photograph leaves an image on his mind - something
has been accomplished.

When the Americans was first published abroad and in the U. S., it
was sharply criticized. But the popularization of the beat movement
  • the second edition of The Americans featured an introduction by
Jack Kerouac - helped Frank to reach a broader and more accepting
audience.

Frank's once avant-garde style on the 1950's is now taken for
granted. We see it daily in print advertisements for jeans or in
music videos on MTV. But Frank's original photographs are still
extraordinary and surprisingly contemporary.

Here's are a couple links to some of his pictures...

http://www.cis.yale.edu/amstud/r66/fr1.html

http://photography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.mopa.org/pastrobfrank.html

--
Camera Slug
Gallery: http://www.pbase.com/cameraslug
--
Canadian Ann
http://www.pbase.com/canadian_ann
http://www.stfchallenge.com
http://www.cs.duke.edu/~parr/photography/faq.html
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top