Sorry, but you put yourself in this position and cemented it with your continuing denials and feigned ignorance. Deal with it. At least it supports my theory that you're probably not a racist (an idea which I never entertained) even though you'll continue defending your use of (what you now know to be) a clearly racist pseudonym.
Ah, thank you. Too bad that he seems to be from the USA. If he was from Great Britain that would have made a clever double pun.
Sorry to disappoint you.
What strange fabrications and fantasies you construct. Shows only that you're running out of steam and are grasping at straws to insult. Your words paint a more accurate picture of yourself .
Yes. It is out of date because it isn't updated for digital. In fact, the article doesn't even mention digital, let alone the fact that there might be special considerations regarding "correct" exposure in the digital domain.
You're welcome.Thanks for that "insight" Barry.
Not to mention why anyone would want to use the sunny 16 rule when any digital camera you wish to use will inevitably have an exposure meter.
Having a good idea of what an exposure SHOULD be in any one lighting condition, and having it independently of a meter, is no bad thing.... not least because it is an early warning of exposure meter failure.
http://www.photonhead.com/beginners/exposureinro.php
