Why is my D40 getting outperformed by my P&S in low light photography?

Basic exposure theory is out of date ?

Thanks for that "insight" Barry. :-)
It depends what you mean by 'basic exposure theory', but if by it you mean the necessity to select an exposure that maps the scene brightness to specific parts of the densiometric curve of the film you have loaded, then Barry is right.
 
The outrageousness is entirely yours in choosing that name. You're not a babe in the woods and too many millions of people (perhaps hundreds of millions) are familiar with the stereotypical usages of "Tyrone",
Not a strong argument. You are saying there are black characters in the media called 'Tyrone'. Very possibly, there are also many white ones, such as Tyrone Power, Tyrone Wood, Tyrone Wells, Tyrone Piper etc. So far as I was concerned, Tyrone is just a name. Its origins are, I believe, Irish, but no connection with that nation is implied or intended either. The racial connotations are entirely in your mindset, not mine. So is the association of 'Wellhung' with a particular community.

Frankly, being accused of racism is not something I take lightly, particularly not the suggestion that it is intentional.
Whether you take it lightly or not is irrelevant. Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity. I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
 
You guys have ruined what was an otherwise informative thread
All of us? You replied directly to one of my replies but never responded to this earlier one :

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1002&message=36154550

As has already been noted, the reason for replying to mine may be accidental, if you reply in Flat mode instead of in Threaded mode. But if you're choosing sides, don't forget that there's a good reason that so many on one side are all the same person using different login names to appear as if they're different people, and they/he are the ones that most often start threads into a downward spiral.
Productive + informative posts can come from otherwise disruptive + petty posters (not that I'm calling you that; just saying that whatever value you added was canceled out by your participation in the bickering). I don't know where you are but I am getting ready to head out to a nice party soon. The weather here is beautiful. You guys should re-evaluate the value of winning an "internet battle" on what might be one of the nicest + last days of the summer.......

Truthfully, if a poster is that much of a problem... take your beefs up with them in PM or contact a mod. The first method will really make you call into question whether or not engaging such a poster is really valuable, or is just an exercise of "**** showing". The second + correct method is really the best way to deal w/annoying posters. Obviously a troll feeds on responses & attention, so to engage one publicly is to stoop to their level and become a part of the problem. You've been going back and forth with whoever all day. Why?

Just my $.02
 
Whether you take it lightly or not is irrelevant. Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity. I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
Could the way the name is perceived be culturally influenced a search on Google UK will result in a huge amount of hits relating to the Northern Irish town of the same name. And I can honestly say that I have never heard the name used as a racist taunt , my first thought was of a daft white character in a popular soap { I spend too much time watching TV with my Mum when I pop over to see her :) } . I am not saying that this is definitely the case, but perhaps worth thinking about before firing out accusations of racism. I have seen no indication of racism in Tyrone’s posts but there have indeed been what I would perceive as racist postings made by other posters in other forums.

Jim

--

 
The outrageousness is entirely yours in choosing that name. You're not a babe in the woods and too many millions of people (perhaps hundreds of millions) are familiar with the stereotypical usages of "Tyrone",
Not a strong argument. You are saying there are black characters in the media called 'Tyrone'. Very possibly, there are also many white ones, such as Tyrone Power, Tyrone Wood, Tyrone Wells, Tyrone Piper etc. So far as I was concerned, Tyrone is just a name. Its origins are, I believe, Irish, but no connection with that nation is implied or intended either. The racial connotations are entirely in your mindset, not mine. So is the association of 'Wellhung' with a particular community.

Frankly, being accused of racism is not something I take lightly, particularly not the suggestion that it is intentional.
Whether you take it lightly or not is irrelevant.
It isn't at all. To make unjustified accusations based on one's own prejudices is a highly offensive thing to do.
Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity.
You mean people who don't, like you, associate the name 'Tyrone' with black people are naive or stupid?
I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
Again, you are constructing motivations from your own prejudiced mindset. This discussion is revealing much more about your prejudices than it is mine.
 
. . .

Truthfully, if a poster is that much of a problem... take your beefs up with them in PM or contact a mod.
You can't be serious can you? Taking anything up with them using PM, email or whatever is guaranteed to be just as futile as in the thread. I haven't resorted to the insults and attacks used by the other side, despite their accusations of same. Referring to them as "them" is also amusing, especially after the admissions of using multiple names, aka "sock puppets". Who has a history of being permanently banned? Not I.

The first method will really make you call into question whether or not engaging such a poster is really valuable, or is just an exercise of "**** showing". The second + correct method is really the best way to deal w/annoying posters. Obviously a troll feeds on responses & attention, so to engage one publicly is to stoop to their level and become a part of the problem. You've been going back and forth with whoever all day. Why?
Initially just my surprise at seeing the appearance of one of the sock puppets not only appear, but also finally publicly admit the multiple login names. It also served a purpose in notifying anyone not familiar with him/them that the appearance usually signifies that the thread will soon be highjacked, changed into a discussion of the sock puppet's perennial pet topic, equivalence, DOF, noise, etc. Whether I mentioned this or not, it's what usually happens with this crew. Pointing it out apparently isn't appreciated and causes great overreactions, mud-slinging and other types of insults.

Just my $.02
I would have preferred your two bits, inflation ya know . . .
 
Whether you take it lightly or not is irrelevant. Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity. I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
Could the way the name is perceived be culturally influenced a search on Google UK will result in a huge amount of hits relating to the Northern Irish town of the same name. And I can honestly say that I have never heard the name used as a racist taunt , my first thought was of a daft white character in a popular soap { I spend too much time watching TV with my Mum when I pop over to see her :) } . I am not saying that this is definitely the case, but perhaps worth thinking about before firing out accusations of racism. I have seen no indication of racism in Tyrone’s posts but there have indeed been what I would perceive as racist postings made by other posters in other forums.
You're right, there is a cultural element to it and almost anyone that has lived for an extended time in the USA is probably well aware of it. I also haven't seen "Tyrone" making any racist postings and for all I know he isn't a racist. But despite the denials, he must be aware of the racial/racist significance of the name, and probably chose it because he thought it would be amusingly provocative, as the other sock puppet names tend to be. To go so far as to deny the 'puns' behind the choice of word pairs used for the names is denial for its own sake, completely unbelievable.
 
Whether you take it lightly or not is irrelevant. Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity. I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
Could the way the name is perceived be culturally influenced a search on Google UK will result in a huge amount of hits relating to the Northern Irish town of the same name. And I can honestly say that I have never heard the name used as a racist taunt , my first thought was of a daft white character in a popular soap { I spend too much time watching TV with my Mum when I pop over to see her :) } . I am not saying that this is definitely the case, but perhaps worth thinking about before firing out accusations of racism. I have seen no indication of racism in Tyrone’s posts but there have indeed been what I would perceive as racist postings made by other posters in other forums.
Jim, I think you've hit the nail on the head. He's American and I'm not. He probably sees the name 'Tyrone' in a different cultural context, and makes assumptions on my motives based on that. If this nick causes black people any offence, I will do my best to change it, so far as DPR will allow. (I'm not really to concerned about offence caused to prudes, but that's a difernt matter).
 
Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity.
You mean people who don't, like you, associate the name 'Tyrone' with black people are naive or stupid?
It's this statement that shows stupidity. I don't associate the name Tyrone exclusively with black men and am quite familiar with all of the "white" Tyrones that you mentioned. To deny that "Tyrone" isn't often used as a black stereotype is naive and stupid. As I wrote, using it alone wouldn't be a problem. If you chose "Tyrone O'Malley" or "Tyrone The Invincible" or "Tyrone Tyrone" or "Tyrone Chevalier" nobody would have objected. But choosing "Tyrone Wellhung" is another matter, and shows more than insensitivity. Despite your denials, it's intentionally provocative.

I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
Again, you are constructing motivations from your own prejudiced mindset. This discussion is revealing much more about your prejudices than it is mine.
More empty denials. Why do you think that "Tyrone" was chosen for the title of the book? Just coincidence? Hardly. Were the authors also prejudiced or did they have a reason for using "Tyrone". Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much.
 
Could the way the name is perceived be culturally influenced a search on Google UK will result in a huge amount of hits relating to the Northern Irish town of the same name. And I can honestly say that I have never heard the name used as a racist taunt , my first thought was of a daft white character in a popular soap { I spend too much time watching TV with my Mum when I pop over to see her :) } . I am not saying that this is definitely the case, but perhaps worth thinking about before firing out accusations of racism. I have seen no indication of racism in Tyrone’s posts but there have indeed been what I would perceive as racist postings made by other posters in other forums.
Jim, I think you've hit the nail on the head. He's American and I'm not. He probably sees the name 'Tyrone' in a different cultural context, and makes assumptions on my motives based on that. If this nick causes black people any offence, I will do my best to change it, so far as DPR will allow. (I'm not really to concerned about offence caused to prudes, but that's a difernt matter).
Possibly but still unlikely. I've mentioned the racist implications several times to you in the past several months and you never asked what I was talking about, and the way you've dismissed and/or ignored the "Tyrone" examples I've shown is also telling. You have little credibility.
 
The problem here is you using the boards to run your personal and ill informed campaigns against others.
. . .

Truthfully, if a poster is that much of a problem... take your beefs up with them in PM or contact a mod.
You can't be serious can you? Taking anything up with them using PM, email or whatever is guaranteed to be just as futile as in the thread.
As I remember, in a previous instance of one of your attacks, I suggested you take the matter up in a pm if you had differences, and you declined rather rudely. The point is that you want to have these fights in public, because your goal is to discredit those you disagree with.
I haven't resorted to the insults and attacks used by the other side, despite their accusations of same.
You are a liar. That is not an insult, it is a matter of fact. You claim not to resort to insults and attacks yet you are one of the most insulting posters around here.
Referring to them as "them" is also amusing, especially after the admissions of using multiple names, aka "sock puppets". Who has a history of being permanently banned? Not I.
You are also misinformed, as I said somewhere above, and repeatedly say, I am not GB. You were told that at length by Joseph Wisniewski, and still you continue to imply it.
The first method will really make you call into question whether or not engaging such a poster is really valuable, or is just an exercise of "**** showing". The second + correct method is really the best way to deal w/annoying posters. Obviously a troll feeds on responses & attention, so to engage one publicly is to stoop to their level and become a part of the problem. You've been going back and forth with whoever all day. Why?
Initially just my surprise at seeing the appearance of one of the sock puppets not only appear, but also finally publicly admit the multiple login names. It also served a purpose in notifying anyone not familiar with him/them that the appearance usually signifies that the thread will soon be highjacked, changed into a discussion of the sock puppet's perennial pet topic, equivalence, DOF, noise, etc. Whether I mentioned this or not, it's what usually happens with this crew. Pointing it out apparently isn't appreciated and causes great overreactions, mud-slinging and other types of insults.
It was a very good question. Just why are you so obsessive about these poeple (who you seem to imagine to be one) that you will join threads just to attack them? 'Notifying anyone not familiar with him/them that the appearance usually signifies that the thread will soon be highjacked' is kind of a self fulfilling prophesy when it's you doing the hijacking.

My own theory is that you are one of the the many bogus self appointed 'experts' here who's been debunked by Joe in the past and can't get over it.
 
. . .

You are also misinformed, as I said somewhere above, and repeatedly say, I am not GB. You were told that at length by Joseph Wisniewski, and still you continue to imply it.
Who is GB? As I recall, Joe referred to someone known as "Bob" but didn't provide any additional identification.

My own theory is that you are one of the the many bogus self appointed 'experts' here who's been debunked by Joe in the past and can't get over it.
A "theory" only intended to extend your attacks/insults. If you think that we had any contact in the forums it should be easy to track down, but I'm afraid that it will be a waste of time. I'm not aware of ever communicating with him before he was banned. I did read a few of his posts but didn't hang out in his forums. At the time I thought that what he wrote was slightly interesting but he didn't write well enough to make it worth following and wasn't aware at the time that he was so divisive. In fact I had a slightly positive feeling towards him because of his name. I've long been fond of the name from a memory of Joemama, who made records in the 60's. Joe (the other one) may even be familiar with him. Considering his most recent title you might like him too. Here's the real deal :
JOEMAMA (a.k.a. Joseph Rickard) has been entertaining Florida Keys audiences for most of his recent career, which stretches over a 50 year span. He has a regular following of tourists,, bikers and of course locals- who flock to his long-running Thursday gig at Dockside on Boot Key Harbor and at Burdines Tiki which is across the harbor on Friday nights. Joemama who hails from the Catskill Mountains of upstste New York, gives his fans the kind of music they don't expect in a tropical setting. Folky,old timey, blues, country. and originals. Some reggae,rock & roll and Buffett also in the mix.This powerful performer plays guitar, banjo and fiddle.Since a short lived contract with Warner Brothers records in the mid sixties,he has produced a collection of CDs, the latest being "NO SCUM ALLOWED". In Joe's colorful career he has been most influenced by musicians like:Levon Helm, Tom Paxton, Tommy Jerral, Fred Neil, Amazing Rhythm Aces, and Pete Seeger. Some of whom he has played with over the years.




http://joemamamusic.com/discography.html

Edit: There's also this, which backs up what I wrote about "Your Mama" & "Yer Mama" :
In the film This Is Spinal Tap, the heavy metal rock band Spinal Tap's replacement drummer is named Joe "Mama" Besser, most likely a reference to Besser's role as a replacement Stooge as well as the insult "Yo mama."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Besser
 
Could the way the name is perceived be culturally influenced a search on Google UK will result in a huge amount of hits relating to the Northern Irish town of the same name. And I can honestly say that I have never heard the name used as a racist taunt , my first thought was of a daft white character in a popular soap { I spend too much time watching TV with my Mum when I pop over to see her :) } . I am not saying that this is definitely the case, but perhaps worth thinking about before firing out accusations of racism. I have seen no indication of racism in Tyrone’s posts but there have indeed been what I would perceive as racist postings made by other posters in other forums.
Jim, I think you've hit the nail on the head. He's American and I'm not. He probably sees the name 'Tyrone' in a different cultural context, and makes assumptions on my motives based on that. If this nick causes black people any offence, I will do my best to change it, so far as DPR will allow. (I'm not really to concerned about offence caused to prudes, but that's a difernt matter).
Possibly but still unlikely. I've mentioned the racist implications several times to you in the past several months and you never asked what I was talking about, and the way you've dismissed and/or ignored the "Tyrone" examples I've shown is also telling. You have little credibility.
Why would I ask what you're talking about when it was very clear you were just hurling insults, as you always do. Based on your previous exchanges I have no reason to believe that there are any limits in how low you'd stoop to try and discredit people you're waging your vendetta against.

P.S. In refreshing my memory of the above, I also found the evidence to refute the lie you told about why you wouldn't use the pm or email to avoid cluttering the forum with your baggage.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=35827709

'I have no interest in knowing your "email addy" or Joseph's, and wouldn't use email or pm to communicate with either of you. This forum is more than sufficient for that purpose.'
 
Taken individually there's nothing wrong with using the name Tyrone, but used in juxtaposition with "Wellhung" shows either disingenuousness or extreme naivety/stupidity.
You mean people who don't, like you, associate the name 'Tyrone' with black people are naive or stupid?
It's this statement that shows stupidity. I don't associate the name Tyrone exclusively with black men and am quite familiar with all of the "white" Tyrones that you mentioned. To deny that "Tyrone" isn't often used as a black stereotype is naive and stupid.
I am unaware of that use (if it exists outside your head). Jim was unaware of that use. Americans I have been in contact with are unaware of that use.
As I wrote, using it alone wouldn't be a problem. If you chose "Tyrone O'Malley" or "Tyrone The Invincible" or "Tyrone Tyrone" or "Tyrone Chevalier" nobody would have objected. But choosing "Tyrone Wellhung" is another matter, and shows more than insensitivity. Despite your denials, it's intentionally provocative.
It shows that you are making connections which are unintended. As I said, I am not American, there is no reason for me to associate the name with the same things that you do. You assume so only because it suits your campaign of denigration.
I don't think that you're stupid. I notice that you didn't include the quoted photos, including the cover of the book "Deconstructing Tyrone". No, not stupid at all. Just shrewd.
Again, you are constructing motivations from your own prejudiced mindset. This discussion is revealing much more about your prejudices than it is mine.
More empty denials. Why do you think that "Tyrone" was chosen for the title of the book? Just coincidence? Hardly. Were the authors also prejudiced or did they have a reason for using "Tyrone". Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much.
I'm not aware of the book, so I'm not aware of their motivations. This is something you obviously think of all the time, an association strong in your mind, but not in mine. What I find strange is that this is brought up in the context only of making an attack on me. If there is an issue, a simple pm or email explaining what you perceived the problem to be would have fixed it. Strange you've never done that. Strange also that no American (of a friendly persuasion) has raised the issue, if it's so obvious.
 
. . .

P.S. In refreshing my memory of the above, I also found the evidence to refute the lie you told about why you wouldn't use the pm or email to avoid cluttering the forum with your baggage.
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=35827709

'I have no interest in knowing your "email addy" or Joseph's, and wouldn't use email or pm to communicate with either of you. This forum is more than sufficient for that purpose.'
This is bizarre. This only backs up what I wrote and it will be even clearer to anyone that takes the trouble to follow the link. Here's just the part of that reply that immediately follows your quote.
It's also quite presumptuous to think that Joseph would be a reasonable choice as an arbiter or go-between, since he has already chosen sides, jumping head long into this fray backing one side and attacking the other. If you doubt this say so and I'll provide quotes proving this assertion.
I also wrote "I share my email address with only a very small number of people that I respect, like, or both.", and while you never were in consideration to be one that I'd share my email address with, your insult above ("just pm me" if communication would be too hard) and the false characterization of a vendetta only further cements that decision. If anything, the preponderance of comments made to or about you, Shull, et al. show that if the average DPR member doesn't find these exchanges interesting or edifying, you have yet to grasp the reasons for it.
 
The problem here is you using the boards to run your personal and ill informed campaigns against others.
. . .

Truthfully, if a poster is that much of a problem... take your beefs up with them in PM or contact a mod.
You can't be serious can you? Taking anything up with them using PM, email or whatever is guaranteed to be just as futile as in the thread.
As I remember, in a previous instance of one of your attacks, I suggested you take the matter up in a pm if you had differences, and you declined rather rudely. The point is that you want to have these fights in public, because your goal is to discredit those you disagree with.
I haven't resorted to the insults and attacks used by the other side, despite their accusations of same.
You are a liar. That is not an insult, it is a matter of fact. You claim not to resort to insults and attacks yet you are one of the most insulting posters around here.
Yes, he is. Isn't he? I could respect that hadn't he taken it to obsessive levels.
Referring to them as "them" is also amusing, especially after the admissions of using multiple names, aka "sock puppets". Who has a history of being permanently banned? Not I.
You are also misinformed, as I said somewhere above, and repeatedly say, I am not GB. You were told that at length by Joseph Wisniewski, and still you continue to imply it.
The first method will really make you call into question whether or not engaging such a poster is really valuable, or is just an exercise of "**** showing". The second + correct method is really the best way to deal w/annoying posters. Obviously a troll feeds on responses & attention, so to engage one publicly is to stoop to their level and become a part of the problem. You've been going back and forth with whoever all day. Why?
Initially just my surprise at seeing the appearance of one of the sock puppets not only appear, but also finally publicly admit the multiple login names. It also served a purpose in notifying anyone not familiar with him/them that the appearance usually signifies that the thread will soon be highjacked, changed into a discussion of the sock puppet's perennial pet topic, equivalence, DOF, noise, etc. Whether I mentioned this or not, it's what usually happens with this crew. Pointing it out apparently isn't appreciated and causes great overreactions, mud-slinging and other types of insults.
It was a very good question. Just why are you so obsessive about these poeple (who you seem to imagine to be one) that you will join threads just to attack them? 'Notifying anyone not familiar with him/them that the appearance usually signifies that the thread will soon be highjacked' is kind of a self fulfilling prophesy when it's you doing the hijacking.

My own theory is that you are one of the the many bogus self appointed 'experts' here who's been debunked by Joe in the past and can't get over it.
Nah, all the thing screams of a medium sized fish accustomed to small bowls that cannot stand bigger especimens. That will explain his fixation on the endowment of African American males.
--
-------------------------------------------------------
My Galleries: http://webs.ono.com/igonzalezbordes/index.html
 
. . .

I'm not aware of the book, so I'm not aware of their motivations. This is something you obviously think of all the time, an association strong in your mind, but not in mine. What I find strange is that this is brought up in the context only of making an attack on me. If there is an issue, a simple pm or email explaining what you perceived the problem to be would have fixed it. Strange you've never done that. Strange also that no American (of a friendly persuasion) has raised the issue, if it's so obvious.
You argue like some lawyers (in court) that I've known. Choosing words that may sound logical and true but are intended to deceive. It's their job, they're paid well to do it, and everyone, including judges recognize and tolerate it. It's also interesting (not "strange") that nobody called me on it, saying that the juxtaposition of "Tyrone" and "Wellhung" was innocuous and probably unintentional. I didn't think that you were aware of the book, which is why I showed the cover photo. This isn't about the author's motivations but why they chose to use the name Tyrone. I can understand its significance being unfamiliar to those in the UK, but it's certainly familiar to some. You can keep pretending to not know why "Tyrone Wellhung" might be offensive to many people, but you can no longer pretend to be unaware. It's especially significant today :





http://newstalgia.crooksandliars.com/gordonskene/lest-we-forget-august-28-1963-martin-l
 
. . .

You are also misinformed, as I said somewhere above, and repeatedly say, I am not GB. You were told that at length by Joseph Wisniewski, and still you continue to imply it.
Who is GB?
Great Bustard

As I recall, Joe referred to someone known as "Bob" but didn't provide any additional identification.
Don't get your Bobs and Joes muddled up.
My own theory is that you are one of the the many bogus self appointed 'experts' here who's been debunked by Joe in the past and can't get over it.
A "theory" only intended to extend your attacks/insults. If you think that we had any contact in the forums it should be easy to track down, but I'm afraid that it will be a waste of time. I'm not aware of ever communicating with him before he was banned. I did read a few of his posts but didn't hang out in his forums. At the time I thought that what he wrote was slightly interesting but he didn't write well enough to make it worth following and wasn't aware at the time that he was so divisive. In fact I had a slightly positive feeling towards him because of his name. I've long been fond of the name from a memory of Joemama, who made records in the 60's. Joe (the other one) may even be familiar with him. Considering his most recent title you might like him too. Here's the real deal :
[snip a whole load of stuff intended to portray billx08 as a culturally aware well adjusted human being]

So what you're saying is you launched the obsessive vendetta for no reason? Strange. And obsessive it is, you started this sub-vendetta against me because you confused me with him. Very odd behaviour.
 
. . .

I'm not aware of the book, so I'm not aware of their motivations. This is something you obviously think of all the time, an association strong in your mind, but not in mine. What I find strange is that this is brought up in the context only of making an attack on me. If there is an issue, a simple pm or email explaining what you perceived the problem to be would have fixed it. Strange you've never done that. Strange also that no American (of a friendly persuasion) has raised the issue, if it's so obvious.
You argue like some lawyers (in court) that I've known. Choosing words that may sound logical and true but are intended to deceive. It's their job, they're paid well to do it, and everyone, including judges recognize and tolerate it.
All right, all right, but did they eventually get the restraining order?
 
. . .

I'm not aware of the book, so I'm not aware of their motivations. This is something you obviously think of all the time, an association strong in your mind, but not in mine. What I find strange is that this is brought up in the context only of making an attack on me. If there is an issue, a simple pm or email explaining what you perceived the problem to be would have fixed it. Strange you've never done that. Strange also that no American (of a friendly persuasion) has raised the issue, if it's so obvious.
You argue like some lawyers (in court) that I've known. Choosing words that may sound logical and true but are intended to deceive. It's their job, they're paid well to do it, and everyone, including judges recognize and tolerate it. It's also interesting (not "strange") that nobody called me on it, saying that the juxtaposition of "Tyrone" and "Wellhung" was innocuous and probably unintentional. I didn't think that you were aware of the book, which is why I showed the cover photo. This isn't about the author's motivations but why they chose to use the name Tyrone. I can understand its significance being unfamiliar to those in the UK, but it's certainly familiar to some. You can keep pretending to not know why "Tyrone Wellhung" might be offensive to many people, but you can no longer pretend to be unaware. It's especially significant today :



http://newstalgia.crooksandliars.com/gordonskene/lest-we-forget-august-28-1963-martin-l
And that is the biggest load of politicians twaddle I've seen for a long time, especially the use of the image at the end, designed to put yourself on the side of good and portray me as an opponent of everything that he stood for. That is as big a lie as anything you have said, and just shows how low you will go. It shows just how unhinged you are that you'd resort to that kind of tactic to win a web forum war on a photographic forum . You have big issues.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top