Thanks so much for your posting and for what is the best test for a camera, I mean real world samples from real users.Hi Condor,
I do not like beating around the bush, so I will show you the good and bad from what I have experienced with he HS10, hence my decision to buy a D5000 as well.
First I'm totally clear of P&S super zooms limitations, so I do not expect more than what they can produce. I'm so clear about that that in fact I consider 3 segments to fill for my amateur birding hobby.
1.- P&S super zooms, lower preformance, lower price, funny features: and so far HS10 is winning.
2.- Midle performance, midle price: And I think that the eventual new Panasonic GH2 plus the already announced 100-300mm lens (200-600mm equiv) are going to be my set for this segment (with its wider-angle kit lens it would let my future LX3 as my backup)
3.- Higher performance, higher price: Just for birding, and after a deep analysis my set for this segment would be Canon 7D plus the 400mm f/5.6
Each set would have its moment depending of the circumstances, place, risks, trip duration, nature of the trip, etc. And sometimes I would carry even 2 sets for backup, for oportunity shoots or for simplicity purposes.
For the first segment, I do not care at all about noice, mishmash, etc, since it would be a camera that I will always carry in my car basically for identification purposes and for bird behavior register. I also will carry always with me a Panasonic LX3 (LX5 does not produce as beautiful photos) for all non long-zoom situations (80-90% of my photos; landscapes, touristic, groups, portraits, parties, macros, etc)
This is something I wanted to know, "Fuji extra in camera zoom", since I always used the Extra Optical Zoom of the FZ35/38 since that way I got better bird photos, and also "already cropped". So, how many options of extra zoom does it have? FZ100 has Intelligent Zoom that produced 799mm equiv and Extra Optical Zoom (3Mp) of 1.266mmAt ISO 100 and enough light available you will be pretty safe.
Pic 1, Kookaburra, was shot at 126mm + extra in camera zoom applied (763mm). You still can clearly and sharply see the dirt around its beak. No PP applied.
All your samples are acceptable for me for a P&S-super-zoom (almost toys) cameras.Then it goes downhill.
With the 2 following examples i unfortunately had left the camera on ISO 800. It provided a safe 1/2200 sec shutter speed for shooting without a tripod but the noise and mash/mush became unbearable. Pic 2 a (Pigeon) might for some not be acceptable anymore, so I had to PP and scale to get something out of it (pic 2 b).
Pic 3 a (? bird name), the noise and mishmash is not acceptable at ISO 800, PP and scale had to be applied but I ended up with a small print (3b).
I do not use PP, I'm an amateur birder and a normal-person photographer, so my birding photos are almost just for me and for the rest of my photos I will use other cameras, and people who watch my photos (family and friends) do not care too much about technical issues but about the moment I was living, the scene I was watching, the persons that were there or the experience I was enjoing. I do not publish my photos in any publication and I do not even print photos since more than 10 years, neither my family or friends do, we use Internet to share them or we watch them in PC-monitors or in TV-sets.If anyone can make something better out of 3 a with PP, please feel free to do so and post.
Thanks so much again.