D700 & 16-35mm f4 Nikkor: Lightning over Grand Teton NP

tcphotog

Member
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA, US
Had some fun in a heavy downpour during a thunderstorm while driving along Jackson Lake in Grand Teton National Park last week. I stopped at the lake just after sunset when the fading light still backlit the mountains, and the thunderstorm was still approaching.

An hour later, in total darkness, I caught this image with a 1 minute (or so) exposure on bulb, ISO 400, f8, no noise reduction. It was so dark I manually focused the lend to infinity, pointed in the direction of the mountains which I could only see during lightning flashes, and took about 15, 1 minute exposures.

The colors aren't fudged - this is a slightly cropped jpeg taken right form the raw in PS. The illumination is all from ligtning - the blues from far off lightning behind the clouds, and the brighter illumination on the right of the frame from the big bolt. What a blast!

The D700 is still alive and kicking - and testimonial to why an amateur ca be well served by a (semi) pro body - this was taken in a driving rain, with the body and lend lightly shielded with a plastic grocery bag, but still soaked. The body and lens never hiccupped.



 
Very nice image. I love the double lightning. The multiple strikes peeking out below the clouds work well with the larger bolt on the right. Makes it more interesting than your average lightning shot. How many separate strikes does this represent?

The colors are great, and not really surprising to me. The purple is similar to what I've gotten. It was a surprise at the time. Since then I've seen it in other lightning photos.

If you don't mind a suggestion, I think you could improve it by darkening the mid tones on the right side. Do a Curve Adjustment Layer in Photoshop and use a radial gradient centered on the lightning on the right. This will give the image a more balanced feel, and increase contrast for the bolt on the right.
--
Robin Casady
http://www.robincasady.com/Photo/index.html
 
I'll definitely make some adjustments like you suggest.

I actually have no idea how many lightning strikes this was. There were so many occurring in the clouds above me that I hardly noticed the downstrikes in the distance. Many were landing to the right of my frame, but I didn't reset the camera position because I wanted to catch one with the Tetons framed in the center.

I agree - the lighting in this and several of the other frames caught me off guard. I was disappointed at the time because the images during the fading sunset weren't as good as I'd hoped due to rain, and I wasn't sure how the later 60+ second exposures would turn out. In the end, it's a nice dramatic moment caught on "film."
 
fantastic! thx for sharing!

I had the 4/16-35 VR in my hands last saturday ... t e m p t i n g ...

... but perhaps I'd better get me a 2.8/70-200 VRII first (in addition to my 2.8/24-70).

but you made me reconsider as well.

SpaceDoc
.
 
I've owned a 17-35mm f2.8 since it was first released, and sold it last year after a challenging hand holding situation cost me some great images, convincing me that despite conventional wisdom about the usefulness of VR on a wide zoom, it would have saved the shoot for me. I see almost no difference in my images from the two when shot at similar apertures. The 16mm has noticeably ore distortion at the far wide end, but it's correctable in PP.

It's a fine lens, and IMO a suitable replacement even for the "legendary" 17-35.
 
arrrrgh ...
... do not make me spend more money! :-))))

SpaceDoc
.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top