George morris
New member
Anyone hear anymore about a Canon 60D unveiling? The drums are beating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Here is a rumor: it will be called 7D, perhaps to finally end name confusion with the Canon D60 and Nikon D60.Anyone hear anymore about a Canon 60D unveiling? The drums are beating.
I shoot film all the time, and just mailed off 5 rolls last week. Digital allows you to be sloppy and pick the best out of too many photos. Believe it or not using film makes you concentrate and actually get it right; although I will admit digital is good for most sports/action photography.But, ask yourself now, are you willing, for starters, to go back to film, pack your cartridge into the mailer, and send it off for processing? Can you limit yourself to 12, 24, or 36 exposures with no instant do overs?
I shoot film as well, although for obvious reasons digital is numerically the more important format for me now. I don't send my films anywhere, though, since I still have a good local lab that even does E-6 development.I shoot film all the time, and just mailed off 5 rolls last week. Digital allows you to be sloppy and pick the best out of too many photos. Believe it or not using film makes you concentrate and actually get it right; although I will admit digital is good for most sports/action photography.
Not so much dynamic range but latitude, which means that by shooting color negative your highlights will never be blown, unless your metering is really bad. Some B & W films offer very good dynamic range as well, but the difference to best DSLRs is no longer that great.Film also provides for slower ISO speeds, and greater dynamic range capturable in certain films compared to digital - especially in the highlights.
BTW: the OP is still at 1 post as of nowWhere is the 3D forum? I did not see one in the Forum listings.
Thank you
--
Gritty
OK, digital makes it easier to be sloppy, but it is the photographer who makes the decision to be sloppy with digital. I like this reply:I shoot film all the time, and just mailed off 5 rolls last week. Digital allows you to be sloppy and pick the best out of too many photos. Believe it or not using film makes you concentrate and actually get it right
I loved the transition to digital and don't want to deal with the color deterioration, scratches, and dust of film ever again. But shooting digital doesn't mean I make the choice to be sloppy. Experienced photographers should teach novice photographers: If you value your life (your time), you will choose to not be sloppy with digital, because when you shoot too many frames, your cards and disks fill up too fast, and culling from too many frames and attempting clever digital fixes to sloppily shot frames takes too much time and trouble and never looks quite right. Shoot fewer digital frames, more carefully.However, there are people who do not get lazy and skip the pre-visualization with digital, and for them shooting film has no psychological advantages. You can also try to learn to shoot with digital like you were shooting film, so the psychological advantage of film is not really tied to the medium rather than a behavioral pattern. Still, for people who are naturally impatient shooting film can be a valuable learning experience, like all activities that encourage proper preparation and patience.
Maybe ask your source. surely they must know!Anyone hear anymore about a Canon 60D unveiling? The drums are beating.
There's still all the talk of those that take 1500-2000 photos at a wedding while film photographers get the same number of great photos while taking say 400 photos.OK, digital makes it easier to be sloppy, but it is the photographer who makes the decision to be sloppy with digital.I shoot film all the time, and just mailed off 5 rolls last week. Digital allows you to be sloppy and pick the best out of too many photos. Believe it or not using film makes you concentrate and actually get it right