olyflyer
Forum Pro
I agree on Skagen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thanks Pasi - and and it's nice to finally have a Finn chime in and defend the beauties of Finland!Hi Christa!!
Nice trip you have planned!! May I offer my (very biased) opinion? Being Finnish, I
would naturally take you down through the labyrinth of lakes in eastern Finland
(Called Lake Saimaa, or just Saimaa for google) . You could ride say: Inari, Kuusamo,
Kajaani, Nurmes, Koli, Joensuu, Punkaharju, Savonlinna and then over to Helsinki
to catch a ferry to Stockholm (or Tallinn).
Kuusamo region has rapids and hilly wilderness, whilst the Saimaa region is truly amazing in summer time: If you fly over that region, you cannot tell islands from the main land since it's all scattered with land and water 50-50.
![]()
There's also a dramatic medieval castle (Olavinlinna) in Savonlinna.
![]()
Just my two cents.... Pasi
Ah, finally a Dane! Thanks for the tips, Christian.Hello
I have lived in Aarhus, Denmark for 12 years now and like it very much. It is a very good place to live. However, in my mind, it is not very interesting from a tourist perspective and not very scenic for photos. Instead of going to Aarhus, i would advise you to go to Skagen, which is on the north tip of Denmark - its an old fishermans town with a lot of soul. It really has extraordinary lights this time of year which will work very well on photos with all the water around it (two seas meet eachother on this spot(maybe you know some of the Skagen Painters, which were a small collective of some of the more famous painters in danish history, who moved there to take advantage of the light).
Have a good trip.
Christian
Hehe, olyflyer, you're right about our having seen our share of mountains, which is why we're more keen on seeing coastlines, "boring" or notWell, that's a matter of taste. Personally I prefer the flatter scenery than the scenery of Norway. Don't forget that Christa is from Switzerland so she has seen some snowy mountains before...Northern Sweden and Finland is flat and a bit boring. But Stockholm is worth a visit, a beautiful city.
As for "Stockholm worth a visit" that's very stereotypic. Personally in a once in a life time trip I'd pass through Stockholm as fast as possible and would concentrate on more unusual places. Stockholm, Oslo and Copenhagen are just some big cities and waste of time in my opinion on a trip like this. All three can be visited on a separate occasions quite simply by flying there directly. Spending a day or two in each would be just a huge waste of time and money. Of course, like your opinion about the flatter landscape is personal, this is also just my personal opinion, but I don't think the aim with such a trip is to visit large cities; at least it would not be my aim.
Thanks Raymond, and I'll definitely visit your website! I've seen some gorgeous pictures of the Lofoten islands, which is why I'm really looking forward to spending a few days there. My husband is keen on going sea fishing for a day; we've read in our guidebook that many villages on Lofoten rent boats and tackle for a day or an afternoon, and then you can cook your catch on the pier when you get back. Have you ever done this? Where? I'll decide when we're there whether to join him or go hiking and take some pictures, instead (probably the latter).EspE1 makes a lot of sense. Nordkapp is not a very special place except that it is supposed to be the northernmost point of Europe. Lofoten is another matter all together. I live in Oslo, and I go to Lofoten every year (I have never been to Nordkapp and I have no plans to go there). The outermost point of of Lofoten is the island of Røst, my favorite spot in Norway. If you are interested in birds, this island is a must. You get there by car fgerry from Moskenes in Lofoten, and you could continue from Røst to Bodø by the same ferry.
Northern Sweden and Finland is flat and a bit boring. But Stockholm is worth a visit, a beautiful city.
EspE1 also suggest taking the "Hurtigruten" for a leg on the trip, and I support him fully. When I have travelled with foreign friends I have started in Harstad and gone to Svolvær in Lofoten. This means you will enter the "Trollfjorden", a very narrow fjord, during daytime. So my suggestion would be to travel southwards from the far north, to Harstad, then "Hurtigruten" to Svolvær in Lofoten. After a stay in Lofoten, go to Røst for a couple of days, see the bird rocks, and then furher on to Bodø.
If you want to see some images from Røst and Lofoten, please visit my website bildebank.com (see below).
If you want more details about what to see in Lofoten, don't hesitate to ask!
Thanks Paul!If you take a close look at the map, you will notice that Nordkapp is on an island, not on the mainland, and that it is not even the northernmost point on that island. The cape cliff even looks much better from afar than from the top of it. The real northernmost points are far less easy to get to, and names like "Knivskjellodden" do not appeal that much to tourists.
If you decide to go the considerable extra distance up from Lofoten to get to Finnmark, do consider the islands of Loppa, similar, tiny, fishing ports, not so spectacular mountains, but far less crowded than Lofoten in the tourist season.
I would not worry that much about mosquitoes out on the coast in Finnmark; it is the inland which can be an ordeal.
Like others here, I agree that the first 500km up to Trondheim (with Europes northernmost medieval cathedral), will be more interesting (but slower) the further west you go. A suitably sigzag route needing 3 days might take you from Oslo to Hønefoss along lake Sperillen (with an excellent tiny shop for inland fish; "villfisken") after a while up over the mountains on toll roads (remember to have 10 and 20kr. pieces with you.) to Gol, through Hemsedal and over Filefjell (past Borgund Stave church), onwards from Lærdal across a number of fjords
up to Møre where the Jugend-style city of Ålesund is worth a look before you go on to the routes described elsewhere. Again, the outermost coast is totally different from the inland.
On the way up, the smaller coast roads and the tiny mountain roads are in general much more scenic than the inland mainroads, so do not be too rigid in setting daily distance goals. Do bring kit suited to a week of rain and 10degrees C, as well as for sun and 20C, and do not expect to go faster than 80kmt without hefty fines when caught by speedtraps.
p.
Yes, I know Switzerland is beautiful. I have been living there for 1.5 years and been back many times both for business and pleasure. Last time I was there was last year and we spent a week in Lugano and a few days in Zürich. I also know Norway a bit, been there as well a few times and yes, it is also nice. Never the less, I just assumed that a person living among the Alps will more likely wish to see other type of scenery, not just more mountains. Everything has its beauty though, which is why I said it is just a personal opinion how I would do if I were you.Hehe, olyflyer, you're right about our having seen our share of mountains, which is why we're more keen on seeing coastlines, "boring" or notWell, that's a matter of taste. Personally I prefer the flatter scenery than the scenery of Norway. Don't forget that Christa is from Switzerland so she has seen some snowy mountains before...Northern Sweden and Finland is flat and a bit boring. But Stockholm is worth a visit, a beautiful city.
As for "Stockholm worth a visit" that's very stereotypic. Personally in a once in a life time trip I'd pass through Stockholm as fast as possible and would concentrate on more unusual places. Stockholm, Oslo and Copenhagen are just some big cities and waste of time in my opinion on a trip like this. All three can be visited on a separate occasions quite simply by flying there directly. Spending a day or two in each would be just a huge waste of time and money. Of course, like your opinion about the flatter landscape is personal, this is also just my personal opinion, but I don't think the aim with such a trip is to visit large cities; at least it would not be my aim.But I'd surely advise anyone visiting Switzerland to go see the Alps, because they are beautiful. So I understand why the Norwegians would suggest we visit their mountains, because according to the guide books they really are spectacular.
That's the way I see it as well. It isn't that expensive and it is more comfortable to fly there and spend a week or a few days without a bike than with a bike.My husband agrees with you about (not) visiting cities on this trip; I've already been to Stockholm in summer, so I'm fine with skipping that and concentrating on the smaller places along the coast. We can visit Stockholm anytime on a week-end trip.
You're welcome.And thanks again for the invite; I just checked on the map where Lund is.
I'm pretty sure that I remember a beautifull beach somewhere in the Lofoten Islands where we stopped for a swim. The water was surprizingly warm - much warmer than our own Pacific coast of Oregon, USA.... it would be nice to get a swim in before we head up north! ...
Cheers
Christa
I have to fully agree with your point ... Norway is a chest full of gems, but in some parts there are more of them and it is worth to spend a time there. I cannot help myself but have to return each year again and again ...I would generally advice that if you for this trip has North Cape as your target, you should go north more or less as directly as you can, to see what time you then have available for the return trip - and possibly return to southern parts of Norway for another time.
Another good point. I know quite a lot about relationship of Nordic countries one to another and their history, but honestly Norway is a different class if we are talking of landscapes. (is it worth to say that I was in Finland six times just in this year and several trips to come ...?).I will - not just because I am Norwegian - say that northern Finland and Sweden around the Baltic Sea is not the most interesting and scenic areas.
Really? Well, that's nice to hear! I've heard that the air gets quite warm up there thanks to the Gulf Stream, but that the water isn't quite as inviting... But maybe we'll go for a swim just for the heck of it: take a dip in the ocean north of the Polar Circle!I'm pretty sure that I remember a beautifull beach somewhere in the Lofoten Islands where we stopped for a swim. The water was surprizingly warm - much warmer than our own Pacific coast of Oregon, USA.... it would be nice to get a swim in before we head up north! ...
Cheers
Christa
I'm looking forward to the photos! It sounds like a wonderfull trip. (but not for me on a motorcycle)
--
Yes, some American and British friends of mine were very happy that they c ould go fishing, clean the fish on the pier and then cook it. We did this in a very special and beautiful village called Nusfjord. However, new owners are now charging an entrance fee to the village itself!Thanks Raymond, and I'll definitely visit your website! I've seen some gorgeous pictures of the Lofoten islands, which is why I'm really looking forward to spending a few days there. My husband is keen on going sea fishing for a day; we've read in our guidebook that many villages on Lofoten rent boats and tackle for a day or an afternoon, and then you can cook your catch on the pier when you get back. Have you ever done this? Where? I'll decide when we're there whether to join him or go hiking and take some pictures, instead (probably the latter).EspE1 makes a lot of sense. Nordkapp is not a very special place except that it is supposed to be the northernmost point of Europe. Lofoten is another matter all together. I live in Oslo, and I go to Lofoten every year (I have never been to Nordkapp and I have no plans to go there). The outermost point of of Lofoten is the island of Røst, my favorite spot in Norway. If you are interested in birds, this island is a must. You get there by car fgerry from Moskenes in Lofoten, and you could continue from Røst to Bodø by the same ferry.
Northern Sweden and Finland is flat and a bit boring. But Stockholm is worth a visit, a beautiful city.
EspE1 also suggest taking the "Hurtigruten" for a leg on the trip, and I support him fully. When I have travelled with foreign friends I have started in Harstad and gone to Svolvær in Lofoten. This means you will enter the "Trollfjorden", a very narrow fjord, during daytime. So my suggestion would be to travel southwards from the far north, to Harstad, then "Hurtigruten" to Svolvær in Lofoten. After a stay in Lofoten, go to Røst for a couple of days, see the bird rocks, and then furher on to Bodø.
If you want to see some images from Røst and Lofoten, please visit my website bildebank.com (see below).
If you want more details about what to see in Lofoten, don't hesitate to ask!
As a matter of fact, I have not! It is on my list, also, but I have seen whales in Logfoten.Btw, have you ever gone whale-watching in Andenes? There's this company there that claims it can practically guarantee a sighting - money-back or new trip if you don't!
You don't have to be tired of driving to take a trip with Hurtigruten! There are people who come back every year just for this coast voyage. If you go from Harstad to Svolvær, you will never forget it. Promise.I've read about the Hurtigruten; I think we'll consider it if we're tired of driving.
--
Ok, I've checked out Nusfjord; pretty steep prices for their cabins, though they include the rentals of fishing tackle and a rowboat. We'll see; according to our guidebook, you can rent a boat and go fishing in many villages.Yes, some American and British friends of mine were very happy that they c ould go fishing, clean the fish on the pier and then cook it. We did this in a very special and beautiful village called Nusfjord. However, new owners are now charging an entrance fee to the village itself!My husband is keen on going sea fishing for a day; we've read in our guidebook that many villages on Lofoten rent boats and tackle for a day or an afternoon, and then you can cook your catch on the pier when you get back. Have you ever done this? Where? I'll decide when we're there whether to join him or go hiking and take some pictures, instead (probably the latter).
Thanks! Whew, there's a lot to see and do on the Lofoten Islands alone! I've been checking out the Hurtigruten, and also the tourist boats that take you into the Trollfjorden.Where to stay in Lofoten? I would suggest two villages, Henningsvær and Å. In the bay where you leave the main road, swimming is possible. In Henningsvær I can recommend Heimgårdbrygga for staying, but there are many other very nice places. In Å, which is the end of the road, you can just go to the reception which is responsible for all the "rorbuer" (fishermens cabins). They will also take you on a boat trip around the peak of the Lofoten islands.
We're planning on being on the Lofoten from July 15-18, but I don't think we'll make it out to RostPS. I shall be at Røst July 15-July 22. Just ask for me (Raymond) at the Røst Brygge Hotel, and I will be happy to guide you.
Well, you don't need to take a tourist boat into the Trollfjorden if you travel from Harstad to Svolvær because Hurtigruten goes in there! It has to turn around its own axis to turn around because the fjord is so narrow.Ok, I've checked out Nusfjord; pretty steep prices for their cabins, though they include the rentals of fishing tackle and a rowboat. We'll see; according to our guidebook, you can rent a boat and go fishing in many villages.Yes, some American and British friends of mine were very happy that they c ould go fishing, clean the fish on the pier and then cook it. We did this in a very special and beautiful village called Nusfjord. However, new owners are now charging an entrance fee to the village itself!My husband is keen on going sea fishing for a day; we've read in our guidebook that many villages on Lofoten rent boats and tackle for a day or an afternoon, and then you can cook your catch on the pier when you get back. Have you ever done this? Where? I'll decide when we're there whether to join him or go hiking and take some pictures, instead (probably the latter).
Thanks! Whew, there's a lot to see and do on the Lofoten Islands alone! I've been checking out the Hurtigruten, and also the tourist boats that take you into the Trollfjorden.Where to stay in Lofoten? I would suggest two villages, Henningsvær and Å. In the bay where you leave the main road, swimming is possible. In Henningsvær I can recommend Heimgårdbrygga for staying, but there are many other very nice places. In Å, which is the end of the road, you can just go to the reception which is responsible for all the "rorbuer" (fishermens cabins). They will also take you on a boat trip around the peak of the Lofoten islands.
--We're planning on being on the Lofoten from July 15-18, but I don't think we'll make it out to RostPS. I shall be at Røst July 15-July 22. Just ask for me (Raymond) at the Røst Brygge Hotel, and I will be happy to guide you.
Btw, I looked at the photos on your website: as lovely as I expected! And I also looked at a few of your great beachvolleyball shots again.
Cheers
Christa
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ch_cnb/
As a Norwegian I will not deny that Finland has its beauties. However, look at that first photo - its an aerial photo. What do you see from that road, is something altogether different. My experience from some years ago when we traveled the whole of Finland from Finmark (Norway) north of Finland all the way down to Turku/Åbo and Helsinki/Helsingfors and back north again, was a kind of disappointment in relation to Finland being the "land of thousand lakes". Yes, the lakes are there, but 99% of the time on the road they were hidden behind trees, woods, woods, trees, woods and so on. By the way, did I remember to mention the boring, boring woods?Thanks Pasi - and and it's nice to finally have a Finn chime in and defend the beauties of Finland!That first pic in particular looks very appealing.
300 km radius - hm, then you miss Cape North by 40 km....I am sorry (Christa) as I am not going to hi-jack this thread, but as few experienced guys from Norway joined this thread I would like to ask for some suggestion as well ... Hope you are fine with that ... EspE1 , Raymond (or anybody else), can you please advice me some points of interests to not miss in Loppa area (generally Alta and about - say - 300 km around)? I will admire any suggestion as it is very difficult to get those information ... I will stay at Sor-Tverrfjord for two weeks in July and looking forward to discover and shoot whatever I can, also because I cannot repeat this 3500 km trip (one-way) often.
Honestly I am not so interested by North Cape itself ...300 km radius - hm, then you miss Cape North by 40 km....
Thank you for suggestions - we are not going this way, but will consider visiting those places ... We are going across the Germany, then just short ferry to Dennmark, then along entire Swedish coast to Finland and finally across Finnish and Norwegian Lapland to Oksfjord.On the other hand Tromsø (the capital of Northern Norway, with several places of general interest) and its surroundings, including the very scenic area Lyngen east of Tromsø, which you pass through on your way if you take the shortest route by the ferries, is well within reach. So is also the vast highland plane Finnmarksvidda, and you can reach Kautokeino on the south side of it, one of the centers in the Lappish culture.
I am interested in any kind of nature - fjords, lakes, glaciers, waterfalls, valleys, etc. I love the landscape of Norway, especially combination of water and rocks ... I will distribute my time for sea fishing and discovering the area - actually expecting trips to Oksfjordjokelen glacier, Loppa lakes, Loppa island bird colony, Alta canyon, E6 waterfalls and more what I will find (also thanks to you). The bad is that I understood there is no road from Sor-Tverrfjord to the mainland and that the Sor-Tverrfjord - Oksfjord ferry goes only once each day. This sounds limiting, but 24 hrs. long days should help ... (we booked a house for 2 weeks in Sor-Tverrfjord)Depends a little on what interest focus you have - and possibly also how much are you are prepared to walk.