Reading mode: Light Dark

Anyone ever solve the F200 random blur issues?

Go to last post
Yes, what a weird place for that setting!
It did much better last night, only had about 2-3 OOF shots out of a 100 :)

My worst problem was,... I touched the lens and my shots have a finger smudge lol, I'm such a dork :)
Lilianna said:
Rorn, when you descibe the mid-range focus uissues, I knew this option was enabled. The F200, despite its tricky handling is my favorite compact, F70 being a very close second!
Ron777 said:
It's off now, thanks for the tip! Can't wait to try later, thanks Miss Lillianna! :)
Lilianna said:
Try under the Shooting menu/Power Management/Quick AF
:)
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colette_noir/
Click to expand...
--
Photography shots
http://www.flickr.com/photos/invisodude/

Snap shots
http://s618.photobucket.com/albums/tt266/randsphoto/
Click to expand...
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colette_noir/
Click to expand...
--
Photography shots
http://www.flickr.com/photos/invisodude/

Snap shots
http://s618.photobucket.com/albums/tt266/randsphoto/
 
LOL you mean cause I smudge my lenses, I step in dog turds while taking shots.. not to mention all the other things I don't even mention LOL
Wayne N. said:
Ron777 said:
My worst problem was,... I touched the lens and my shots have a finger smudge lol, I'm such a dork :)
Click to expand...
LOL! At least you are an entertaining dork!

Cheers,

Wayne
http://www.pbase.com/wayne_n

Click to expand...
--
Photography shots
http://www.flickr.com/photos/invisodude/

Snap shots
http://s618.photobucket.com/albums/tt266/randsphoto/
 
coming late to this discussion but...............
I blasted through @ 10,000 shots with f70

I could depend on it having some 'shaky' shots every day....they were not repeatable but they were related to the IS. I had them on a tripod, handheld, resting on really large stable slabs of granite, marble steps, everywhere. The entire f70 package was such a good group of compromises that I accepted the occasional IS action as part of the price we pay.

FWIW, I also had (to a much lesser extent) the same is issues with the hs10, never with s100fs.
wj
--
nikonricohandfuji
 
I didn't know the F70 suffered from that too, I guess it must be the IS system. Maybe it shakes opposite of what it should and adds to the vibration, interesting.
wymjym said:
coming late to this discussion but...............
I blasted through @ 10,000 shots with f70

I could depend on it having some 'shaky' shots every day....they were not repeatable but they were related to the IS. I had them on a tripod, handheld, resting on really large stable slabs of granite, marble steps, everywhere. The entire f70 package was such a good group of compromises that I accepted the occasional IS action as part of the price we pay.

FWIW, I also had (to a much lesser extent) the same is issues with the hs10, never with s100fs.
wj
--
nikonricohandfuji
Click to expand...
--
Photography shots
http://www.flickr.com/photos/invisodude/

Snap shots
http://s618.photobucket.com/albums/tt266/randsphoto/
 
should I take it from your replies that you have not suffered this shaky image syndrome?

maybe its me but I've even suffered it with Nikon glass (vr), although rarely, more so with third party lenses. I can consistantly hold my 70-200 2.8 @ 200mm 1/80 sec and get less shakey images with the vr off, the difference is that with the nikon glass this difference requires some serious pixel peeping (blood in the eyes type) where as with the fuji the images look a bit 'jumpy' at 50% or higher.

If you don't ever have this occur I would like to compare settings at some point in time.
wj
--
nikonricohandfuji
 
wymjym said:
should I take it from your replies that you have not suffered this shaky image syndrome?
Click to expand...
Jim, sorry for the brevity of my responses, was short of time :(

I have heard that if one uses a tripod with any IS lens or caera body one should shut the IS off. I have not followed this advice and have seen no ill effect ( but I do not own a decent tripod so perhaps it is just as well I have left it on ;)
wymjym said:
maybe its me but I've even suffered it with Nikon glass (vr), although rarely, more so with third party lenses. I can consistantly hold my 70-200 2.8 @ 200mm 1/80 sec and get less shakey images with the vr off, the difference is that with the nikon glass this difference requires some serious pixel peeping (blood in the eyes type) where as with the fuji the images look a bit 'jumpy' at 50% or higher.
Click to expand...
If the Fuji is gonna have issues, it being so small and light they will shop fast. I have gone through many images from both little Fuji's and do not see the effect you describe. When I do see motion blur it is my fault; shooting one handed and too quickly in low light or shooting a moving subject. In brief I would blame it on the camera only the operator. I am not blaming you BTW, again I wonder if this is the Quality Control monster rearing its ugly head.
I have been lucky, all my Fuji's have been well sorted out when I got them.
wymjym said:
If you don't ever have this occur I would like to compare settings at some point in time.
Click to expand...
Certainly Jim
wymjym said:
wj
--
nikonricohandfuji
Click to expand...
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/colette_noir/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top