Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The tree leaves in the 1ds samples are still ugly!!! The same for
all bayer sensor, no matter how many pixels they have. Even size
the files down to 3MP, the tree leaves are still ugly.
The only time I saw beautiful leaves was when the Foven samples
first came out.The nature's beauty lies in things like tree leaves,
rather than wall bricks. A "wall bricks" recording camera is not a
great camera in my heart, at least not for nature photography!!!
Oh BTW, please to not replyIgor
You post, post and post text.
Show your true colors by posting one or two
of your images ... please.
Louis
The tree leaves in the 1ds samples are still ugly!!! The same for
all bayer sensor, no matter how many pixels they have. Even size
the files down to 3MP, the tree leaves are still ugly.
The only time I saw beautiful leaves was when the Foven samples
first came out.The nature's beauty lies in things like tree leaves,
rather than wall bricks. A "wall bricks" recording camera is not a
great camera in my heart, at least not for nature photography!!!
Only because you don't know.Igor R. wrote:
Compared to what? Film? Hah! What is your 'fabulous' standard by
which this 1DS looks so bad?
Unless your equipment exists only in cyber-space, what do you use
that is so fantastic? Give us the 'standard' by which you think
this 1Ds is soo awful.
Well, photography for you is just bussiness.For me, I need to sell images to clients. I can do this --- easily
--- with those 1Ds images -- that to apparently so many here are
"filled with surprising amounts or noise" and chock full of "bayer
interpolation anomolies".
Let's see...Who is going to come to your resucue then? Sigma? To each his/her
own.
I'm not saying that it is SO BAD, I'm just saying that leaces looks BAD, as usually on Bayer cameras.Compared to what? Film? Hah! What is your 'fabulous' standard by
which this 1DS looks so bad?
What new do you want to see?Show your true colors by posting one or two
of your images ... please.
You want to see any photo ever taken by me?Oh BTW, please to not reply
with "I don't have to show you no stink'n badges"
Wangler
--
Darkness is made up of dark particles.
Igor,You want to see any photo ever taken by me?Oh BTW, please to not reply
with "I don't have to show you no stink'n badges"
Post us your best shot or two!What new do you want to see?Show your true colors by posting one or two
of your images ... please.
It's true to get the best possible print we will adjust the color balance, tweek the levels, add sharpening, and so on. But to understand that process and see the potential to which you're referring... ah, that would require some thought, some imagination, and some experience.Good grief! If you can't look at these samples and see the
tremendous potential in the camera that made them instead of
spouting all this nonsense about lack of sharpness, poor color,
bayer, etc. etc... well hell. I shall hold my words.
Sorry! I am not new to DSLR. In the contrary, I am one of those jumped in at the first hand. Having had D30 for more than 1 year and D60 for half a year, I am pretty confident in my experience on tweaking those digital files.If you all were not so amusing you would be exasperating. Has it
ever occurred to you that maybe the leafs in the sample don't look
so great because the quality of light on them is not all that
great? What I have found with the D60 is that the orginal image
tends to come out a little bit flat. This is not a bad thing, this
is a good thing, because that flatness is caused by an adundance of
information and depth. Just the slightest levels adjustment in
Photoshop brings out the snap and vibrancy that is in the colors,
including the green of leafs.
This is my first ever post addressing non-positive thing on 1DS. 1DS is sharp. I've never deny that. I didn't mention that the color is poor. These are all you guessing. Quality wise, it is just a upgrade from D60, mostly pixel-count wise. Nothing revolutionary. I am not grieve about anything. Just a little bit get tired of the pixel increasing game. If you feel 11MP is such a great upgrade from 6MP D60, congratulations then!Good grief! If you can't look at these samples and see the
tremendous potential in the camera that made them instead of
spouting all this nonsense about lack of sharpness, poor color,
bayer, etc. etc... well hell. I shall hold my words.
Sorry to tell you my similar joy came two year ahead of you. I am already getting boring.I will not argue further with you. I will just get the EOS 1Ds
asap, put it to work and leave you all to enjoy your horses and
buggies, horses and buggies being fine things in their own realm.
And who can deny the contribution of the horse and buggy to society?
This is not the best, but one of good (read as Adobe RGB 1998).Post us your best shot or two!
Remember, it is still a preproduction model.Of course, then it wasn't the CAMERA that was bad. It was the
photographer. It was the conditions. It was the exposure. It
obviously couldn't be the CAMERA....
Sounds to me you are in pre-production mode.Remember, it is still a preproduction model.Of course, then it wasn't the CAMERA that was bad. It was the
photographer. It was the conditions. It was the exposure. It
obviously couldn't be the CAMERA....
Doesn't stop you from trashing it...Remember, it is still a preproduction model.
I'm not trashing it, just saying that it is not as perfect, as many peepl thinkin'.Doesn't stop you from trashing it...
I'm not trashing it, just saying that it is not as perfect, as manyDoesn't stop you from trashing it...
peepl thinkin'.
I'm not defending FILM, I'm defending the TRUTH!
Damn, I admire a good humorist!
I'm not trashing it, just saying that it is not as perfect, as manyDoesn't stop you from trashing it...
peepl thinkin'.
I'm not defending FILM, I'm defending the TRUTH!
Actually I am a photographer, not professional, but still.I've got you figured out, Igor. You are not a photographer nor are
you a troll - you are a humorist!
Damn, I admire a good humorist!
I'm pretty sure not one thread defined the 1Ds as perfect. Many people [sic], however, have said that it's suitable for their needs.I'm not trashing it, just saying that it is not as perfect, as manyDoesn't stop you from trashing it...
peepl thinkin'.
I'm not defending FILM, I'm defending the TRUTH!
