Bryan Carnathan
Senior Member
Unless I don't care about the quality of the finished image, then fine .jpg.
Bryan
--
http://www.save-u.com
http://www.nationalticket.com
Bryan
--
http://www.save-u.com
http://www.nationalticket.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
--On the other hand, it seems like all the serious canon
photographers (Fred Miranda, Michael Reichman, etc) use RAW and
convert to Linear tiffs. And their images are absolutely amazing.
One thing that really bugs me is that I thought I had one of the
best computers for multimedia and photography (an apple G4 800mhz)
but when it comes to decoding raw files it is really slow. And
canon software is like the most inefficient piece of cr*p. There
arent any nifty programs like Breezebrowser for the mac, at least
not any that I know of.
do i have a point, or am i just an impatient whiny child?
james
--This is a new one I never heard of, maybe there are many like you
with this problem and I am ignorant of it, which is probably correct.
You shoot in JPG because you PC, sorry Apple is slow? So is
the question if I have a slow computer do I shoot in JPG? If you
have a slow PC, I mean Apple, do you shoot with smaller JPG files?
The quality of those once in a life time photos are not dependent
on the camera or/and lens used by the photographer but the computer
that process them. I would say time for you to save for a
new computer.
RAW always for me.
Bill
--For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
--For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
--For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
----For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
John Mason - Lafayette, IN
For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
--For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james
On the other hand, it seems like all the serious canon
photographers (Fred Miranda, Michael Reichman, etc) use RAW and
convert to Linear tiffs. And their images are absolutely amazing.
One thing that really bugs me is that I thought I had one of the
best computers for multimedia and photography (an apple G4 800mhz)
but when it comes to decoding raw files it is really slow. And
canon software is like the most inefficient piece of cr*p. There
arent any nifty programs like Breezebrowser for the mac, at least
not any that I know of.
do i have a point, or am i just an impatient whiny child?
james
--This is a new one I never heard of, maybe there are many like you
with this problem and I am ignorant of it, which is probably correct.
You shoot in JPG because you PC, sorry Apple is slow? So is
the question if I have a slow computer do I shoot in JPG? If you
have a slow PC, I mean Apple, do you shoot with smaller JPG files?
The quality of those once in a life time photos are not dependent
on the camera or/and lens used by the photographer but the computer
that process them. I would say time for you to save for a
new computer.
RAW always for me.
Bill
Always shoot RAW and save the quality you like. Convert those you
want to print or display to TIF or JPG and store the rest the same
as you'd store a negative. RAW files are a little larger but get a
CD or even better a DVD burner and archive the files and keep in a
safe place.
Steve
For people shooting with the D30 or D60, I'm curious as to whether
you shoot in RAW or JPG. I know the advantages of RAW, but for me
on my "slow" G4 it just doesnt seem practical.
Just want to get a sense of what other people prefer.
thanx
james