Nexx 7 and others things

jpviau

Well-known member
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
Location
Sainte-Catherine QC, CA
Some interesting things coming in 2010-11 I guess. I'm pretty sure Olympus is working on another inovative design and concept for this year too.

http://blog.livedoor.jp/e_p1/

JP

--
'On n'existe que si on est photographié' (Jorge Luis Borges, Le livre de Sable)

E-1 (sold 2009); E-520 (since December 2008) E-410 (since June 2007, now used by my daugher) E-500 (2006- lost 2007); zuiki 14-54 (sold 2009); zuiko 14-42 (sold 2009); zuiko 14-45; zuiko 40-150Mk1; zuiko 40-150 Mk2 (sold); zuiko 50 f2 macro; Zuiko 70-300; flash FL-36
 
Okay people. This NEX thing in the m4/3 forum is getting ridiculous. WRONG FORUM +1 !
 
I don't understand all the objections to discussion of the NEX (and Samsung NX, and speculation about Nikon and Canon mirrorless systems, etc.).

Don't users on the Canon DSLR forums discuss Nikon developments, and vice versa?

Seems like other mirrorless cameras should at least be of passing interest on this forum. Granted the NEX has gotten more discussion recently than actual MFT cameras (or so it feels), but it's not trolling (or not all).
--
-Jay

http://flickr.com/photos/48504267@N00/
 
We own M43 and want to hear and lern about M43, why is that so hard to understand? What is the Sony forum for?, if they are not interested why should we?
--
Bluephotons
Ah, but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. Bob Dylan
 
Look at the lens

 
Good catch...SonyStyle guy here in San Diego that let me play with the NEX-5 said for sure there was another prime lens coming soon...maybe that is it.
 
Good catch...SonyStyle guy here in San Diego that let me play with the NEX-5 said for sure there was another prime lens coming soon...maybe that is it.
A 20mm f/1.8 would make a lot more sense than the 16 as a kit lens though it still is mildly wide for portraits. Something like a 55mm would be better for portraits.
 
Although I can't read anything on the site, I was surprised to see the EPL-1 pictures were much more clear than the Nex. In particular the night shot of the building. Either that or the Nex photographer was shaking like the dickens.
 
Let's hope Nex-9 gets a makeover before the release..
Yeah looks like a tiny Alpha 900. Needs to look less bulky.
 
We own M43 and want to hear and lern about M43, why is that so hard to understand? What is the Sony forum for?, if they are not interested why should we?
All new mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are good at this point in that they're additional proof of concept. Also they represent competition, so if the Sony or any other becomes so popular that they dominate the market, that could affect MFT.
--
-Jay

http://flickr.com/photos/48504267@N00/
 
That sounds great! now just move it to the Sony Forum. I don,t remenber the 43 people posting about the upcoming m43 when it was anounce on any forum other than the 43.
--
Bluephotons
Ah, but I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. Bob Dylan
 
If the NEXs and/or NX had been released at the same time as the first M4/3, I think a single forum would have been created for these cameras. Support for the argument that these cameras belong together can be found in Michael Reichman's observation on LL that "We don't really yet have a name for the new generation of cameras represented by the Sony NEX series, Panasonic and Olympus Micro Four Thirds, and the Samsung NX10. I'm suggesting here today the name MARVIL, which stands for Mirrorless Reflex Viewfinder Interchangeable Lens."

On the other hand, there are obviously numerous DSLR forums for cameras that are similar in nature. Thus, at this point in time, a strong case can be made for a M4/3 only forum. (In fact, I wonder if sometime in the future there won't be separate O and P M4/3 forums.)

Nevertheless, I don't think anyone can deny the fact that the NEX, NX and M4/3s cameras share a common difference from both P&S and DSLR cameras. It is also clear that these cameras are competitors--which is good for consumers.

If the NEX/NX posts were monopolizing this forum, then I think your argument that NEX/NX posts don't belong on this forum would have more merit. However, despite the fact that the NEX review is just out, the first page of this forum continues to be dominated by M4/3s topics. Thus, I fail to understand to understand why you have such a problem with NEX posts. You, nor anyone else, has to read them and IMHO they don't pose a problem for people who only want to find andread M4/3s posts here.

I would like to know how many people think that it really serves everyone's best interests to restrict NEX postings to the Sony forums (many more posts on the Sony Alpha forum than on the Sony forum). Personally, I think the NEX has as much, if not more, in common with the M4/3s camera as it does with other Sonys (although the lousy NEX interface might suggest otherwise).

The bottom line is that, while I find posts on this forum that bash M4/3s cameras offensive, I don't have a problem with thoughtful comparisons of MARVIL cameras.
 
On the other hand, there are obviously numerous DSLR forums for cameras that are similar in nature. Thus, at this point in time, a strong case can be made for a M4/3 only forum.
Here's a stronger case for a M4/3 only forum: Micro Four Thirds Talk's official definition is "the place to discuss Micro Four Thirds models such as the Panasonic GF, GH & G series and the Olympus E-P series". Combine that with the fact that dpreview has official policies against "Off Topic messages" and "'flame bait' type messages", and no further case is necessary. This forum has rules; how about following them?
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top