firefox23508
Leading Member
I thought the plan was to have a top end model with EVF built into the body by now ... has anyone heard anything?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering the success of the competition -- G1, G2, G10, GH1 (so far, with no signs of stopping) -- they have no choice. It's not much of a bet.I'd bet my house that Olympus will introduce a model with a built in EVF.
Would really suck if it is. I don't see a reason not to support it. Sure - make cameras to compete against the g1/gh1, but for the pen series, there's no reason not to keep it.However, I strongly suspect that the accessory electronic viewfinder may become an "orphaned" accessory in the near future.
Ideed. Fitting the VF-2 inside a body will make a camera bigger and decrease its appeal, at least for those who have a dSLR.Would really suck if it is. I don't see a reason not to support it. Sure - make cameras to compete against the g1/gh1, but for the pen series, there's no reason not to keep it.However, I strongly suspect that the accessory electronic viewfinder may become an "orphaned" accessory in the near future.
Contrary to expectations, the EVF seems to use more power than the LCD. Perhaps because there are more pixels in the EVF?With the VF-2 turned on the main LCD is off. The size of the LCD in the VF-2 is physically much smaller than the main LCD.
Seems to me that using the VF-2 instead of the LCD might extend battery life. Has anyone done any testing of this?
I don't think so. Did you read the interviews of Olympus' workers and managers published by Dpreview ? Did you read their press releases ? it doesn't sound like you did. They want the pen series to remain small and they don't want to stop the production of 4/3. MFT has to be pocketable and small and that doesn't speak for an integrated VF. Personnally, I find it right so. It is much easier to keep the VF in a separate pocket and to keep the body small.You can bet on it.
An orphaned accessory ???!!! while it is one of the most usefull !! this sounds like a rather stupid bet IMO.You can bet on it.
(....) I'm sure the VF-2 is great and I'd love to have one for use in bright light. However, I strongly suspect that the accessory electronic viewfinder may become an "orphaned" accessory in the near future.
I fully agree but for the last line. It is nice to keep the VF in your pocket, without eating battery and take it out when you need it, aka in the bright sun.Ideed. Fitting the VF-2 inside a body will make a camera bigger and decrease its appeal, at least for those who have a dSLR.
To me small size is more important than and EVF. Perhaps an OLED screen, or a tilt one, could do as well if it keeps size down.
The VF-2 also eats a lot of battery power, so there is no free lunch.
Well, what about resolution ? if the image is much smaller, you need a better resolution.. Do you think that an lcd with two different resolution could be implemented ? Methink it's easier to keep both separated.I wonder if it would be possible for some ingenious manufacturer to turn the LCD into a viewfinder when you place your face up to it. Surely they could just shrink the lcd view into a viewfinder size view (with an adjustable size and di-opter) with some electronic wzardry and maybe add a curtain around the lcd that can spring out against your face to block out light. Then you would not need to worry about increasing the physical size of the camera to accommodate what is essentially another lcd panel. There would be no need for external add-on devices either.
If you add a VF to the pen format, then it won't look like a pen anymore. To big a part to insert in the body to keep the same look.I do hope so, and preferably within the PEN format. Otherwise my purchase of the E-P1 is going to look silly in the long run.
Let's not be silly. "Pen" is just a marketing name. There's no law that Olympus can't make a micro 4/3 camera with an integral viewfinder, whether or not they call it a "Pen." Given the success of the G1, G2, GH1 and the upcoming GH2 -- as well as the recent Panasonic patent showing a GF-style camera with integral viewfinder -- Olympus management would be stupid indeed to ignore the consumer demand for such a camera.If you add a VF to the pen format, then it won't look like a pen anymore.I do hope so, and preferably within the PEN format. Otherwise my purchase of the E-P1 is going to look silly in the long run.
It may be a marketing game for you. For me it is a camera having a nice shape. One which sits well in your hands and remembers a rangefinder. I have no idea whether Olympus will make a camera like you want or not and don't bet on that neither on the contrary. I was just pointing to the inconsequence of the previous post stating that he would like a VF "preferably withing the PEN format". Personnally I think that it is not possible to keep the nice compact PEN size while adding a VF. It is not a case if Olympus designed the two to be separate.Let's not be silly. "Pen" is just a marketing name. There's no law that Olympus can't make a micro 4/3 camera with an integral viewfinder, whether or not they call it a "Pen." Given the success of the G1, G2, GH1 and the upcoming GH2 -- as well as the recent Panasonic patent showing a GF-style camera with integral viewfinder -- Olympus management would be stupid indeed to ignore the consumer demand for such a camera.If you add a VF to the pen format, then it won't look like a pen anymore.I do hope so, and preferably within the PEN format. Otherwise my purchase of the E-P1 is going to look silly in the long run.
You're not paying attention. I don't care what you like or dislike or will or won't buy. I was discussing and replying to the discussion of the likelihood of Olympus making m43 cameras with integral finders.It may be a marketing game for you. For me it is a camera having a nice shape.Let's not be silly. "Pen" is just a marketing name. There's no law that Olympus can't make a micro 4/3 camera with an integral viewfinder, whether or not they call it a "Pen." Given the success of the G1, G2, GH1 and the upcoming GH2 -- as well as the recent Panasonic patent showing a GF-style camera with integral viewfinder -- Olympus management would be stupid indeed to ignore the consumer demand for such a camera.If you add a VF to the pen format, then it won't look like a pen anymore.I do hope so, and preferably within the PEN format. Otherwise my purchase of the E-P1 is going to look silly in the long run.