Ok so you're tired of all these. What do you want to see then?
Dogs, Grand canyon, last pictures with old camera, Concrete slabs,
small pectorals of westereners... You get the drift.
Since dogs are a bit more active beasties (at least more than most cats) and now the 2nd most popular pet in the USA I do not see pics of them being quite as overdone, but it is a close call.
Grand Canyon is definitely on the 'no one gets any point for originality' list when shooting from the rim. Plus, the pollution there ruins most of the long shots now anyway.
Well last pictures with the old camera if it is just before the bus impacts the photographer or the ground rushing up at the photographer would be interesting.
My good concrete slab (and beams) picture has been removed from photo.net so I cannot show you, but, yes, good pics of concrete slabs, at this point, are more interesting than cats. But here is another that at least involves concrete slabs and a sleepy (or bored) Polar Bear.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=414548
Actually, I like small breasted women and enjoy seeing them naked as often as possible no matter where they come from (hey ladies, my eMail address is located just above this posting - hint, hint

). Now if they are self-portraits that is damn interesting. Also, even though that was the most facetious item on the list, I do find the fact that since it is mostly male photographers and that almost all the women are well-endowed (whether naturally or surgically) is a rather telling point (not surprising, though) about my half of the species. Plus, everyone knows that the neck, shoulders, and back are the best damn parts on hot chicks.
What is a worthy subject for photos (digital or not)?
Its not a matter of what is a worthy subject. That is up to each indivdual. What I was getting at was that with our ability to share images on the web it has become obvious how little real creativity any of us have and challenging folks to think outside the box (of kittens) for those going to be shown to the entire world.
Most amateurs will not spend countless hours looking at picture of
others and try to emulate them.
True. Even, though it is probably one of the best methods for learning technique, especially in the studio.
If I see somthing I like, I try to take a picture that shows it the
way I see it. It can be one of the thing in your list or whatever,
I get great staisfation when I snap one that I like.
Good for you. That is exactly what you should be doing.
If someone else likes it that's good too. If I'm especially proud of it then > I'll show it to others. So what if it is a picture of a cute cat, or a spider > (I like spiders
Well, here is the rub. If you are posting your cat picture for specific advice on how to get the shot you wanted or you have captured some unique aspect of cathood, then I see the point of showing it to everyone in the world as opposed to your own little local bevy of folks. However, if it is merely a good picture of a cat you will bore me (and others, I am sure) with your lack of creativity. Not that I don't suffer from a lack of creativity myself, either. In a sense I guess it is a matter of are you showing pictures because they are important to you or because they may be important to others.
Anyway here's the question again what is a worthy subject?
For personal use anything you want is fine with me. I just think people have beat certain subjects to death to the point that even though they are technically perfect and of a beautiful subject the images are ultimately boring within this community.
Antelope Canyon is the perfect example. I can see going there, taking pictures, and showing them to friends. If I had a specific few that I had attempted to capture something in particular and did not know why I failed I would ask for input which would require me to post my examples. But to post them 'for your enjoyment' and to ask for 'all comments welcome' is just so passe'. Especially since, like I said in the original post, there is rarely an uninteresting scene for 500 miles in any direction. Goodness gracious you'd think S UT & N AZ were nothing more than Bryce, Zion, Antelope Canyon, Grand Canyon, Monument Valley, and Arches from looking at most people pictures from the area. What about the hundreds of miles of road between those places and all the beautiful scenery along them? What about the other national parks, national monuments, state parks, etc.? See these (even though several are not all that great photos) for a few roadside attractions.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382439
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382407
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382376
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382424
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382430
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382436
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382443
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=382469
Oh and thanks for the perspective.
Your welcome. I do wish the discussion had been a bit more, um, serious than it has turned out, but, so far, it is a thread that won't die.
Mike Roberts
P.S. I just realized I left one item off my original list. I am sick and tired of Monument Valley, too. The are plenty of other good rocks nearby. Do we all have to take the same picture and show it to everybody in the world from the Visitor Center? You know a scene is overdone if commercials use it on a regular basis. (Or, in the case of Antelope Canyon, they make a fake one as in that drug commercial).