CP Kaesemann or Regular ?

Hello

I looking to buy a new CPL filter for my 35L and I noticed that there
is also one named Kaesemann from B+W

What's the real difference ?

worth getting that one .? after all it's only $15 more

Thanks

Vadim

All of my CP filters are B+W Kaeseman - They are "sealed' and operate more smoothly - I won't use anything else
--
ChrisC

How about optically? Any difference between the regular CPOL MRC and KSM CPOL MRC?

Take a look here:
http://www.lenstip.com/115.1-article-Polarizing_filters_test.html

--

“Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he will sit in the boat and drink beer all day.”—OldFox

Canon 350D XT, Canon 40D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS, 50mm f/1.8, EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro, EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS, EF100-400L f/4-5.6 IS, 580 EX II, MR-14EX

Marius

-No text-
Bogdan

vk2109 said:

Hello

I looking to buy a new CPL filter for my 35L and I noticed that there
is also one named Kaesemann from B+W

What's the real difference ?

worth getting that one .? after all it's only $15 more

Click to expand...

...and, I have to admit, I don't really notice any difference. That doesn't mean that there aren't differences, and maybe even some that I really should have seen, but just that I haven't noticed. Never did a side-by-side test, though -- just going by my impression of the pics I've taken with various lenses and various CPLs.

Of course, I said the exact same thing about the 100 / 2 vs the 135 / 2L, so perhaps that fact alone will allow you to dismiss me as a quack.