NEX-5 Tests from Taiwan

1. The Zeiss images posted there are 100% crop (at 24mm), unlike most other images and the link to the full image shows good corner characteristics in my opinion.

2. For a kit lens, both the 18-55mm and 16mm shows better extreme corner characteristics than my 28-75 KM kit lens when wide open on A900.

3. The reviewer had limited time with the camera and fired only 1 comparison shot between the CZ and the kit zoom in the day and at night at 24mm, under less than ideal conditions (e.g. backlit, no tripod) and despite that, the images looked fine for it's intended purpose/audience.

4. He had the fisheye adaptor on some of the 16mm images and this won't show up on exif info.

5. Final remarks on the kit lens by the reviewer is that he finds it comparable to entry level kit lens quality and added that the image quality at low-light is where the NEX shines.

6. The twin kit lens (16mm and 18-55mm) are listed in it's PRO list in the conclusion and the only CONS are 2 seconds start-up and inconvenient flash option!

7. Lastly, the reviewer was impressed with the shutter responsiveness and auto-focus speed and he strongly recommends this camera when it launches in July.

I was expecting a less than positve review based on the comments here and totally didn't expect such a glowing review for the NEX 5. Just to put things into perspective for those who rely on google translate or simply just jump into conclusions without taking into account the words that are suppose to go along with the images.
 
Sorry, I was mistaken (as I say above) - as there aren't any optical elements in the Alpha mount adapter (or so I'm told), then what I was suggesting must be incorrect.
 
Those samples look good to me. Maybe this camera can finally take place of everything I need in a single device; had a GH1 and GF1 for a little while but they didn't work out for me as I intended.

This is the second Sony camera ever to have my attention (had the R1 years ago). I was about to preorder and then I find that Sony wants $89.99 for an extra battery. Are they kidding??? I thought Panasonic was bad..

--
NIK0N D9O/18TO1O5VR/35MM1.8/SB4OO/SB6OO
PANAS0NIC ZS-3 & TS-1
CAN0N S9O
 
@mastermind THANKS for taking the time to translate.

It's good that Sony have pulled off a reasonably average kit lens, given it's not really larger than the M4/3 equivalents.

--
A rose by any other name is still a chicken.
 
I wouldn't worry about the spare batteries...their infoLithium batteries last longer than they state (unlike my Canon and Fujifilm cameras). $10 cheapies will be available pretty fast for the NEX cameras just like the rest of them. They just won't be infoLithium and relay information on screen about how much time you have left exactly.

This thing is going to be huge regardless of the approval or lack of approval from true enthusiasts.
 
At least you tried buddy....now go pre-order a NEX and be happy ;)

It's a little eery how quite a few people seem to want this camera to be a failure.

I give Sony the benefit of the doubt since their HX1 Super-zoom I had was pretty amazing for a 9mp camera with a tiny sensor...the lens was shaaaarp as can be, same with another smaller Sony I tried. They know sensors and lenses well. Twilight and Anti Blur modes were wonderful on that camera, I can imagine they are amazing on the NEX.

So many sample photos online for the camera are in hazy environments and people just trying to get some stuff online quickly...many exaggerations on how complicated the menu system is....

Did you see how sharp the 24-70mm is in the corners at 24mm after all? Beautiful...almost seems sharper than the center. I never had anything that sharp at 100%
 
I find that Sony wants $89.99 for an extra battery. Are they kidding??? I thought Panasonic was bad..
I am not sure if it's brand new battery, DSLR batteries were $60 in stored but $20 on ebay (even brand new ones).
 
What never cease to amaze me is the way people choose to ignore its shortcomings and magnify those on the M43s. The pictures aren't remarkable frankly speaking (at this point of time) while they do perform well at high ISOs. Just because it's got a bigger sensor (then why no love for NX10) or an ever-tempting price or ultimately it's the brand it carries?
 
about the GF1? Just curious as I have one. I also have a DP2, so I like the larger sensor compacts.
 
The thing is, the kit lenses are kit lenses...many samples online are quite good...no worse than the kit lens samples from Panasonic G series m4/3 cameras. These are better than the kit lenses that come with Canon and Nikon dSLR cameras and many others.

The main thing is the body that about as small as a compact camera with 1/2.3" sensor. That little body that can go in a cargo pocket easily is packing a tilting, very high resolution, very high contrast 3" screen. Packing the Dynamic Range and High ISO ability of the best consumer dSLR cameras. Packing 7fps continuous drive mode. Packing an HDR, Hand Held Twilight, Anti-Blur, and Panorama mode that others do not have.

My Canon T1i kit that was $800 is bested in almost every way by one I can have on me all day, every day for $650 in the NEX-5. No more blown highlights or missed expressions while my kids go down a slide or play on the swings. I can hold the camera over my sleeping twin babies in a crib and get a perfectly sharp photo in extremely dim lighting at 6400 ISO and print it out as an 8x10.
 
Not to mention it will possibly be the best street photography camera going....holding the camera waist level with the screen tilted up towards the sky. The small size already causes less interest from bystanders and at waist level they would think you are just checking out the camera.

Did you guys see how small it really is? Hardly bigger than the well loved Panasonic ZS7.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zARQij5ZSLE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcjwrXDwXuo
 
The thing is, the kit lenses are kit lenses...many samples online are quite good...no worse than the kit lens samples from Panasonic G series m4/3 cameras. These are better than the kit lenses that come with Canon and Nikon dSLR cameras and many others.
It's definitely not better than the 14-42mm zuiko m4/3's. The copy I have is considerably better than the image samples I have seen from the NEX kit zoom.
The main thing is the body that about as small as a compact camera with 1/2.3" sensor. That little body that can go in a cargo pocket easily is packing a tilting, very high resolution, very high contrast 3" screen. Packing the Dynamic Range and High ISO ability of the best consumer dSLR cameras. Packing 7fps continuous drive mode. Packing an HDR, Hand Held Twilight, Anti-Blur, and Panorama mode that others do not have.

My Canon T1i kit that was $800 is bested in almost every way by one I can have on me all day, every day for $650 in the NEX-5. No more blown highlights or missed expressions while my kids go down a slide or play on the swings. I can hold the camera over my sleeping twin babies in a crib and get a perfectly sharp photo in extremely dim lighting at 6400 ISO and print it out as an 8x10.
Most of the images I have seen appear over-exposed for some reason and I'd still have a concern about all the button pressing required to change settings. It probably won't matter to those who only use the auto mode but I couldn't live with it personally.
--
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

warning my posts often contain humour,if you do not understand this concept look it up in the dictionary.
 
Even my T1i takes plenty of button presses and wheel scrolling when I'm setting things up manually...most do besides Leicas, Canon G11, etc.

I think the dcresource set for the NEX looks just as good as the G2 set on there. A few others, mostly in Asia, show some very good photos. Maybe they are getting the right batch of lenses?
 
Even my T1i takes plenty of button presses and wheel scrolling when I'm setting things up manually...most do besides Leicas, Canon G11, etc.
It's the sheer number of key presses that I'd be concerned with, that can be very tiresome after a while. but I guess we'll have to wait for people to give it a good test before we judge it on that.
I think the dcresource set for the NEX looks just as good as the G2 set on there. A few others, mostly in Asia, show some very good photos. Maybe they are getting the right batch of lenses?
Maybe, it will be interesting to see. The competition will be good if it is all it is cracked up to be. IMHO it usually takes a few iterations for new concept to succeed on most levels.

--
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

warning my posts often contain humour,if you do not understand this concept look it up in the dictionary.
 
that Sony will be handpicking lenses that they submit for testing now...after the pre-production units...

Of course we all have no idea if ALL the manufacturers now do that all the time....
 
The mini compact size of the NEX5 is within a couple mm the same dimensions of width, height, and depth as my TZ1. With the 16mm lens its protrudes a little more depth but definitely pocketableas as is my TZ1. My newer versions of TZ are quite a bit smaller primarily in depth. Your observation is correct as for travel or cameras to have always with you, a TZ and NEX5 would make a perfect combo.
 
Most of the images I have seen appear over-exposed for some reason and I'd still have a concern about all the button pressing required to change settings. It probably won't matter to those who only use the auto mode but I couldn't live with it personally.
--
Tony
http://the-random-photographer.blogspot.com/

warning my posts often contain humour,if you do not understand this concept look it up in the dictionary.
That's ok because you can do a customized HDR photo in the same amount of time it takes an Olympus E-P1/2/L1 to take one photo. No over-exposure.
 
That's ok because you can do a customized HDR photo in the same amount of time it takes an Olympus E-P1/2/L1 to take one photo. No over-exposure.
the solution to over-exposure isn't HDR but just dialing in negative exposure compensation
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top