M
mschf
Guest
I don't think I got carried away at all, your explanation that the comparison is valid because both cameras have (almost) the same sized sensor is imo a lot like saying an M8 vs a Canon Rebel is a fair comparison. The R1 is a totally different type of camera to the NEX, I honestly don't see how the NEX could substitute for an R1. There are other LV-based models out there that come much closer to it.Well no need to get carried away,
The NEX is interesting in that it's very compact but it's only so compact due to not having a VF nor much in the way of knobs and buttons... it's all mostly in the menus. I don't see this as very clever engineering. I'd rather have a bit of extra bulk if it means that the camera will stay out of my way and give me quick access to whatever adjustments I want to make. The NEX is also a write-off for me just for the shutter alone: apparently it's not any quieter than a typical SLR.
This always baffled me a bit every time you wrote it. You mostly shoot land and coastlines, which I think doesn't require much in the way of speed or for gear to be super-lightweight, while I've done plenty of R1 street shooting with lots of movement and need for good timing, without hardly any trouble. Persistence pays off, perhaps?I owned an R1 and it was OK, but it was huge, slow and heavy, and I never much cared for the JPEGs.
I see it as a practical alternative/addition for Alpha users because A-mount lenses are to an extent compatible. R1 users are not tied to any lens mount and are free to research the alternatives, which, as stated above, better options exist which come much closer to the R1.I think it was good, but I didnt keep it for long and I certainly would not buy another. So as far as I can see, for many, the NEX could easily be a more practical alternative, particularly if the lenses are good enough
Voila. I don't have an 18-55 or any other A-mount lens, so it's all meaningless to me. I'm very curious to build a system that allows me to experiment with a bunch of old lenses (such as m43) but if I'm going to jump into any one LV-based system, I think I'd invest in and use mostly lenses that are specifically made for it, not something I'd need an adapter for and be forced to putz around with the limitations that poses.I use a kit 18-55 lens all the time and the kit lens is really good.....certainly good enough for me, and that could be used on the NEX
As I mentioned, I think the NEX is interesting, but not because it's revolutionary, mostly because it looks like Sony's thinking of innovating a little again. Maybe in a few model generations, I'd bite (but I doubt it).
--
~ Martin