digitalshooter
Forum Pro
to the Olympus Pen?
--
Thanks,
Digitalshooter
--
Thanks,
Digitalshooter
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--to the Olympus Pen?
--
Thanks,
Digitalshooter
Yes, I'd say so, though they are still behind in the functionality their intended market is likely to want. Especially flash possibilities. NEX is pretty immature at this point.to the Olympus Pen?
Huge step ? It looks like a step up thanks to better high iso and movie, but that's more-less expected to come with time, it was nearly year ago PEN was introduced.I'd say its a huge step past the PEN.
What you say is something I will think about. Especially the last sentence of your post.Yes, I'd say so, though they are still behind in the functionality their intended market is likely to want. Especially flash possibilities. NEX is pretty immature at this point.to the Olympus Pen?
Walt.
I think it's a great move by Sony but the target market is different than the F-series cameras. They had easy control over aperture priority, shutter priority, and full manual, which the NEX does not have. These are not for the people that want to learn about photography. They are a steroid induced compact point and shoot, which should hit quite a big market and I'll love it for people that don't want to learn about photography actually have an option, instead of whining about their DSLRs.The NEX reminds me greatly of the class of camera that Sony excelled in, the F series bridge camera.
It's back to the future. Back to the bridge camera but forward in technology.
Sony sold the F707, 717 and 828 in huge numbers as they proved very popular. I owned the F717 and moved to DSLR for a longer focal length than x5 and a wider angle but the F717 had full manual control, an excellent macro mode and a tilting screen. I always wished that the F717 had interchangeable lenses like a DSLR.
I learnt photography on the F717 and I can see many moving from P&S to NEX and maybe onto higher end DSLR.
The NEX is a brilliant move for Sony IMO.
Yes, NEX3 & Nex5 are Sony's first shots in response to the micro4/3, both PEN and Panasonic G. But I expect that we'll see a steady tattoo of shots that Sony will be firing this year & next in both the mirroress and the dslr battles. I think Sony is primed and ready to go--"about to do so much," as a high-ranking rep said in December.have seen numerous commercials for it today alone, for the first time.
Wonder who Sony will get to pitch the Nex in commercials?
--
Thanks,
Digitalshooter
While I like my HX5 for it's innovative and usefull features I feel the only thing it is lacking is more manual/fine control. At least allow users adjust the output JPEG's NR and sharpening etc.What you say is something I will think about. Especially the last sentence of your post.Yes, I'd say so, though they are still behind in the functionality their intended market is likely to want. Especially flash possibilities. NEX is pretty immature at this point.to the Olympus Pen?
Walt.
The other perspective is what a Sony manager said in an interview. They tried to avoid redundancies beeween DSLR's and NEX as much as possible. The NEX shall be a product for people who don't want these many DSLR features, switches and knobs. That's the market that Sony addresses with the NEX, the intended market.
If you segment a whole market into different target markets you can do this by user needs, user behaviour etc.
I think that they know their cybershot customers very well. The current high-end cybershot product with the most functions is the HX5. I don't see many HX5 functionality that the NEX doesn't have. Maybe GPS and a compass.
Therefore I think that the NEX is a very plausible defined product for step-up buyers.
But I understand that there is another market segment that isn't as well addressed at least with the current NEX cameras. These are the people who want more knobs and switches on a small camera because they want to continue the shooting style they are used to from DSLR's. Possibly that would have been the intended market of the NEX if you had made this decision holding a position at Sony. Sony just choosed another target market in the first round. I think the bigger one.
Maybe in styling it is, but the IQ has a way to go. Look at the images on I-R and compare the NEX to the E-PL1. I see a lot of fringing and chromatic aberration in some of the NEX images. The resolution chart also favors the PEN. Let's face it...the kit lens on the NEX may be nicely made shiny metal, but the images say another thing. Sony is marketing the NEX as an all-in-one device, but the kit lens is of mediocre quality. Until they get some better glass, the m4/3 still have the advantage. It really is no excuse not to include a decent sharp kit lens.I'd say its a huge step past the PEN.
mmm--not what i've been hearing about the iq, VisualFXMaybe in styling it is, but the IQ has a way to go. Look at the images on I-R and compare the NEX to the E-PL1. I see a lot of fringing and chromatic aberration in some of the NEX images. The resolution chart also favors the PEN. Let's face it...the kit lens on the NEX may be nicely made shiny metal, but the images say another thing. Sony is marketing the NEX as an all-in-one device, but the kit lens is of mediocre quality. Until they get some better glass, the m4/3 still have the advantage. It really is no excuse not to include a decent sharp kit lens.I'd say its a huge step past the PEN.
The one thing you can't deny is that Oly, in their DSLRs, have the highest quality glass in a kit lens and it probably transitioned over to the Pens. I can't see Sony, or any other APS-C manufacturer, using the quality of lens in a kit that matches the Oly kits.mmm--not what i've been hearing about the iq, VisualFXMaybe in styling it is, but the IQ has a way to go. Look at the images on I-R and compare the NEX to the E-PL1. I see a lot of fringing and chromatic aberration in some of the NEX images. The resolution chart also favors the PEN. Let's face it...the kit lens on the NEX may be nicely made shiny metal, but the images say another thing. Sony is marketing the NEX as an all-in-one device, but the kit lens is of mediocre quality. Until they get some better glass, the m4/3 still have the advantage. It really is no excuse not to include a decent sharp kit lens.I'd say its a huge step past the PEN.
--
I think this is one of the things that has happened in the last several years. There was this flood of popularity of relatively cheap beginner DSLRs and a lot of P&S users jumped into it without thinking it through and looking at the differences in the details of using the different camera types. And they found themselves with a camera that was not what they were used to and they were not into learning this new system. So they did a whole bunch of whining wanting DSLRs to be converted into their P&S for their comfort. A rather dangerous thing for DSLRs.They are a steroid induced compact point and shoot, which should hit quite a big market and I'll love it for people that don't want to learn about photography actually have an option, instead of whining about their DSLRs.
Note how Olympus is shooting those commercials with the Pen. And making a point of it on the commercial.have seen numerous commercials for it today alone, for the first time.
I've seen one commercial so far, not on TV but in Utube. It was a bunch of teen folks doing the old commercial that Canon used to promote their bayonet mount over pentax thread mount. Can't remember which tennis player right off. The Sony ad looked like the same script pretty much. Lots of interchanging lenses and running around snapping shots without composing or even stopping. I noticed they were carrying the lenses loose in their pockets with neither front or rear lens caps. If that catches on Sony will have a big market in replacement lenses tooWonder who Sony will get to pitch the Nex in commercials?
It is a step that the Oly Pen cannot answer. The Oly Pen has maxed out on sensor size. The NEX mount is big enough for a full frame. It is a stupid mistake on Oly's part. They had a chance to break free of the 4/3 prison, but chose not to.Huge step ? It looks like a step up thanks to better high iso and movie, but that's more-less expected to come with time, it was nearly year ago PEN was introduced.I'd say its a huge step past the PEN.
I wonder what these other guys will do. Will they restrict the size of the sensor in the mirrorless cameras, or would they follow Sony's footsteps. Further, the mirrorless concept is also a good idea for any company to get into medium format. Canon and Nikon can conceivably release medium format mirrorless cameras to compete with the Leica S2.It is for sure answer to m43 formats and sony saw the opportunity for more sales.
Other companies will do as well, Canon, nikon, they all seems not concerned while hard working on their own mirorless slr formats.
The NEX reminds me greatly of the class of camera that Sony excelled in, the F series bridge camera.
It's back to the future. Back to the bridge camera but forward in technology.
Sony sold the F707, 717 and 828 in huge numbers as they proved very popular. I owned the F717 and moved to DSLR for a longer focal length than x5 and a wider angle but the F717 had full manual control, an excellent macro mode and a tilting screen. I always wished that the F717 had interchangeable lenses like a DSLR.
I learnt photography on the F717 and I can see many moving from P&S to NEX and maybe onto higher end DSLR.
The NEX is a brilliant move for Sony IMO.
George
http://www.wirralpix.smugmug.com
I have heard the same claim made by Pentax users. You get what you pay for. The kit lens is usually made as cheaply as possible so that it can be packaged in an attractive deal for new users. Most experienced users will look for something better to got with their new body eventually. The kit lens is not going to make or break a camera. You can change the lens easily, but you cannot change the sensor. The Sony sensor is a huge improvement over the Oly and Pana cameras, and there is room for a full frame sensor. When Sony comes out with a full frame autofocus E mount camera (backed up by Carl Zeiss optics) to compete with the Leica M9, then nobody will be comparing it to the Olympus or Panasonic cameras.The one thing you can't deny is that Oly, in their DSLRs, have the highest quality glass in a kit lens and it probably transitioned over to the Pens. I can't see Sony, or any other APS-C manufacturer, using the quality of lens in a kit that matches the Oly kits.
That would be a mistake, as it would turn off those people who do want the DSLR features in a smaller package.The NEX shall be a product for people who don't want these many DSLR features, switches and knobs. That's the market that Sony addresses with the NEX, the intended market.
That is a marketing mistake. It is often not possible to predict what users need or want, especially for a relatively new product with no marketing history.If you segment a whole market into different target markets you can do this by user needs, user behaviour etc.
But it would be a disappointment for the DSLR user wanting an additional camera for when they cannot carry a DSLR.I think that they know their cybershot customers very well. The current high-end cybershot product with the most functions is the HX5. I don't see many HX5 functionality that the NEX doesn't have. Maybe GPS and a compass.
Therefore I think that the NEX is a very plausible defined product for step-up buyers.
Precisely!But I understand that there is another market segment that isn't as well addressed at least with the current NEX cameras. These are the people who want more knobs and switches on a small camera because they want to continue the shooting style they are used to from DSLR's.