You are missing my point.
And you are missing my point.
I explained to you why several posters react like they do to your posts.
I know and I answered that it is misinterpretations and I answered with why misinterpretations happens.
That is your interpretation, but if I'm really ignoring it - why would I bother writing so many messages trying to answering it and explaining it?
So you see, your interpretation of me ignoring is not correct from my point of view.
In your story , the fault is with those misunderstanding you.
It is your story that I believe there is a fault with them.
Again, I have never written that there is any fault here.
So why are you saying it is my story that there is a fault?
Again, I don't see any fault. I simply explained what is happening.
But you have a responsibility for your action and words.
Yes, I have.
But you are trying to make me responsible for your misinterpretations and your misbeliefs.
I have explained several times what I mean, I have gone deep into what I mean and I'm telling you that what I write is written and there is nothing more in there than the exact words that are in there. And you are clearly ignoring this since you keep on telling me your interpretations and they are still very far from what I actually writes and what I actually think and what I am actually trying to say, and you don't even get it that you are very far from what I'm saying.
So how can you believe that you can connect with me when you are simply writing to me misinterpretations and misunderstandings about what I am doing, what I think, what I believe and what I mean?
So what happens is that I answer with "No, what I meant was" and "No, what I am doing is" and "No, what I was trying to say was" and you still keep on telling me your interpretations without accepting the fact that you have gotten it all wrong.
You completely ignore my corrections of your misinterpretations.
Since it is my writing, I am the one that can tell if it is interpreted right or wrong. And I tell you that you have gotten it all wrong, and you are still getting it all wrong. You don't even see what you are doing here.
And because of this, you can't connect with me because what you write about what I write has nothing to do with what I actually wrote.
No, it is like different books, when it should be different chapters.
No, it is not different books. It is different chapters.
Again, you are claiming your interpretation is worth more than my interpretation, that your interpretation is the fact here. And it is not.
Your interpretation is not fact about my writing. Only I have the facts of what I mean, because I was the one that wrote it in the first place. So it is chapters. Because it came from me. You are trying to make something else out of it than what is there, as usual and you don't even see it happening inside of you.
Again, if you mention these credentials, it comes across as if you try to elevate > yourself above those who are not writers or teachers.
Again you are reading in-between the lines. I have never written that I elevate myself above others. You are, again, reading things that are not there. Why can't you stop doing it? (I know why you can't stop, it is an automatic pattern as I have explained, but you could - if you wanted to - become aware of it and in this you could notice it and when you do, an interesting thing may happen inside of you if you are open to it).
I have written many times - what I have written is written, it is nothing more there than what is written in actual words. And you keep ignoring this and therefore you get things all wrong.
I was simply trying to explain why I divided my point in several messages.
You have a belief that I value people in the sense that I see some as better than others. In my world, no one is better and no one is worse. In my world, no one is "good" and no one is "bad". We are all equal. It may not be so in your world, but it is so in my world.
But, my background means that I am used to certain things and I simply explained that I am used doing certain things and my experience is that this works very well.
It may be a question of "Who's more right now" for you, but in my world it is not a matter of being right or wrong or doing right or wrong. I am writing from a neutral perspective where I simply explain what is happening and how things works and what I mean.
You cannot overrule the definition of irony.
We all have personal definitions of everything and to me irony is a form of a joke.
I think there might be a misinterpretation.
I was referring to your sunlight test, > which was flawed.
It is interresting that you call it flawed. I wrote very little about it. I gave very little information. And you automatically interprets it as being "flawed".
Now, that is interesting, especially when you haven't got enough information to make a judgement about it being "flawed" or not.
--
Take care
R
http://www.flickr.com/photos/raphaelmabo 
