What you provided in the link works. Or you can stack round filters and use a set of stack caps. Like this for example:
http://www.2filter.com/prices/products/stackcaps.html
How many filters do you intend to carry and in how many sizes?
Ah, well, you see, your question is difficult to answer, mainly because I don't currently carry any. I'm still buying my first whole set of gear, stepping up from the P&S world, and just wondering how certain "little" details like this are done in world up multiple accessories and things bouncing (hopefully not) around inside gear bags.
What I can say is that with my first big purchase, which will be including a D700 body and 24-70 f/2.8 lens, I will also be getting a B+W circular polarizer filter and B+W UV/haze filter. I'm sure I will be adding to that as I begin to recognize the need for other filters, but for starters, I figured I'd start with the basics.
The UV/Haze isn't "basic", it's a very advanced filter, only used in a few specialized situations. I typically drag mine out when I'm shooting in a factory with spraying abrasive compounds, or at a beach with blowing sand.
I store a set of polarizers (52, 62, and a pair of 77mm) in a Lowepro filter wallet that looks a lot like the Adorama one you pointed to. Often some 80A filters in the same case.
The link you gave is certainly an interesting concept. Unfortunately there are two things against it: 1. The note about suitability for B+W filters, which is the brand I've already chosen; 2. When possible, I would prefer to get the slim filters, which usually don't have threads on both sides.
There are more than two things against it. Here's a few more:
It offers zero protection from side impacts, while the filter wallet offers substantial protection.
It takes forever to screw and unscrew the stack to get filters in and out of the middle. Not the "flip and grab" ease of the wallet.
Yes, it saves some space and some cost. But I find the convenience of a wallet to be worth the space and cost.
Not that I necessarily need slim filters for this lens,
You don't. And the regular polarizer is a lot easier to turn reaching around the edge of the hood.
at least alone, but if I stack them, then at 24mm, maybe?
What are you going to stack? For those rare occasions where you'd actually use a UV filter, you remove it when using the polarizer, because you get multiple reflections between the filters.
I sometimes stack mine with an enhancing filter, but my good enhancing filter is in Cokin P mount, and P-rings don't vignette when stacked in front of normal thickness polarizers.
Or if I get a wide-angle lens in the future that truly does need a slim filter, it'd be great to already have it, and not have to buy another filter that's the same as one I already have except for being too thick and causing vignetting.
Which wide are you considering? I doubt the new 16-35, being an f4, would vignette with a normal filter.
Still, the product in that link is a really neat idea.
Only if you redefine "neat" to mean "lot of trouble to save a few $".
--
Rahon Klavanian 1912-2008.
Armenian genocide survivor, amazing cook, scrabble master, and loving grandmother. You will be missed.
Ciao! Joseph
http://www.swissarmyfork.com 
