Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
I didn't expect the 1Ds to be sharper than the 1D so that is not an issue for me. I am concerned about the noise level. I can not really tell, since I am at work with a crappy LCD screen (I hate companies that give the employees laptops). I was really hoping the 1Ds would be at least as clean as the D60.Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
Gee the photos posted on Luminous Landscape have very low noise and incredible resolution. I don't know what photos you're looking at???Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
What is striking is white balance or color of the 1Ds, my D60 efforts, however nice they might be perceived in family et al., do not have that vividness out of the box ( I assume the wedding files are jpgs from the 1Ds?).I didn't expect the 1Ds to be sharper than the 1D so that is not an
issue for me. I am concerned about the noise level. I can not
really tell, since I am at work with a crappy LCD screen (I hate
companies that give the employees laptops). I was really hoping the
1Ds would be at least as clean as the D60.
Next year maybe ? If there is a 6MP SD18 in 12 month then Canon better earn what there is to earn on the 1Ds as quickly as possible.The X3 in the SD-9 looks good, but I am not sure it is getting the
colors right. It looks to have a yellowish cast on the skin tones.
Too bad it is at 3Mp, I would pay more attention to it if it were
at least 6Mp (and in a Canon mount). It does look promising.
I guess they aren´t meant to. All they should be is bigger. 11MP is printing bigger than 6MP. The lenses are the same, so why should sharpness improve? Probably its even slightly decreasing, as the resolution might approach the resolution limit of 35mm lenses.Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
Indeed I agree. It looks - although a 1st version - like the more intelligent solution. Qualitative improvement instead of bombing with high Mega- numbers...SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Well, a 1D is sharper than a D30 with the exact same lens ... but a weaker AA filter. The lens is only one part of the system, not the be-all and end-all of sharpness.printing bigger than 6MP. The lenses are the same, so why should
sharpness improve? Probably its even slightly decreasing, as the
resolution might approach the resolution limit of 35mm lenses.
--Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
--Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
--Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
--I didn't expect the 1Ds to be sharper than the 1D so that is not anWhats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
issue for me. I am concerned about the noise level. I can not
really tell, since I am at work with a crappy LCD screen (I hate
companies that give the employees laptops). I was really hoping the
1Ds would be at least as clean as the D60.
The X3 in the SD-9 looks good, but I am not sure it is getting the
colors right. It looks to have a yellowish cast on the skin tones.
Too bad it is at 3Mp, I would pay more attention to it if it were
at least 6Mp (and in a Canon mount). It does look promising.
--
Valliesto
'A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is brave five
minutes longer.'
- R.W. Emerson
--Gee the photos posted on Luminous Landscape have very low noise andWhats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
incredible resolution. I don't know what photos you're looking
at???
--
****
http://www.toskhara.com
I thought the sharpness of the finer details would inprove...they say the 11MP will come in handy for large group shots...but I was looking at the leaves in the sample pictures and I can't see a tremendous improvement over my 1D.I guess they aren´t meant to. All they should be is bigger. 11MP isDetails don't seem sharper than my 1D.
printing bigger than 6MP. The lenses are the same, so why should
sharpness improve? Probably its even slightly decreasing, as the
resolution might approach the resolution limit of 35mm lenses.
--Indeed I agree. It looks - although a 1st version - like the moreSD9 Looking pretty good though.
intelligent solution. Qualitative improvement instead of bombing
with high Mega- numbers...
However if you need big big prints the D1s might be the choice - at
this time.
Bernie
--Unless you use instant 1D. OK it is supposed to be grits,
but I thought it was funny.
I have to say that the noise levels are a little higher than
I was thinking they would be, but looks much better than my 1D.
Steven
--Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
---
My really bad summer pictures:
http://www.pbase.com/snoyes/summer_travels
--The sharpness is looking quite OK to me.
The one thing which I find to be "disappointing" is the
magenta/green moire at the 45 ° diagonal grating on the test chart
(which needs to be replaced).
--Whats with the noise in the "new" pictures?
Details don't seem sharper than my 1D.
SD9 Looking pretty good though.
Whats going on??
--
EOS 1D
28-70 2.8L
In the beginning there was nothing, and then even that exploded.
That yellow flower pic has way more noise in the bokeh than my 1D would show at ISO 400.Most ofthe new pics are taken at 400 ISO!!! That's very low nooise
for 400 ISO,
