Need some tips for a good scan. I am getting 12 to 24 red x's on
the color target scan. I have a Epson 1660 (very fast) scanner.
Try out to setup your scanner to the most neutral settings, e.g. don't use it's drivers collor correction settings or it's accompanied vendor profile.
Clean the glas plate of your scanner and maybe you want also to try to cover the target on the glas plate by an full black cheet of paper, so that the rest of the A4 glas plate is covered with that black sheet when scanning.
I'am getting really good scan results and only a max. of 2 red x's even with some unusual cheap CIS based Artec scanners here.
Try out your scanner profiles with some before/after capable image view tools. E.g. those which allow you to apply input/output profiles and which will then show you a side by side comparision of a loaded and via the profiles processed image. - This gives you often a good chance to compare shown images on your monitor with the original film based image/photos. Of course it's wise to have your monitor first calibrated therefor and also later from time to time.
Also what are you supposed to do with the scanner profile...
I use that final scanner profile for scanning in my analog film based pictures, which I'am going to archive and preview. I also preview, as described before, scanned in images this way to the originals in order to see if their coloring and lightnings are near by each other.
... and do
you use the scanner profile when making printer and paper profiles.
Well, that's a good question. I think Mike can tell you best if a PP generated scanner profile should also be used afterwards for printer profiling scans or not. I can imaging that PP's printer profiling generation steps are already taking this themselves, but I'am not sure for this here. So Mike Chaney should know this much better and thus can tell you for sure.
I for my part would have to find out this via the try'n'error pricipe, in order to find that out. E.g. generating a printer profile once with the use of a pregenerated scanner profile and also once without the usage of any scanner profile. Then I would compare the printed out results in order to see if they make any difference at all, or if one is more pleasing as the other one.
However, as I said before, Mike Chaney should know all this much better than I and possibly is willing to tell us here, what's the right and desired way to do it.
--
vkyr