fotografer
Veteran Member
Oh I forgot, the environmental temperature also play a role in affecting print longevity, and it acts like a catalyst (higher temp, more severe fading).
--
Fotografer
--
Fotografer
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--The "JB Profiles" used on my submissions are freely available onCan you post the profiles you used for the Canon S9000 please?
the website http://wandb.com/icc.htm (website owned by Mark Ward).
I think my contributions would have scored even higher ( sniff ) if
I had used my Profile Prism profiles. Alas, the license agreement
for PP does not permit me to share them with non-PP-owners. I
thought it was "fair" to use only those profiles that were
available to all S9000 owners.
(I am thinking of sending my best PP result to Frank and Alfred for
inclusion, however. I really wanna beat that Epson 2200!
Competitive? Me? ;-)
And, by the way, Profile Prism (at only $69) is the best money
you'll ever spend to improve the quality of your printing --
regardless of which make and model of printer you own! Check it
out at http://www.ddisoftware.com/prism
Frank,
Very enlightening and I agree with the 9000 findings.Can I thank
all of you people involved for a neutral review!
Steve
--Alfred Voegels would like to call your attention to an evaluation
of print samples from several of today’s popular photo printers.
The evaluation started here at dpreview in the thread
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=3126587
where Alfred decided that in order to make an informed buying
decision he would ask readers of dpreview to send him some samples
of their printers. This call for samples resulted in several
volunteers sending in samples and some of us reviewed and evaluated
those samples. The result of this evaluation is available online in
a web site we created for this purpose.
WE DO NOT CLAIM THIS EVALUATION IS SCIENTIFIC OR HAS ANY MERIT
WHAT-SO-EVER. IT IS NOT OUR INTENTION TO SAY THAT ONE PRINTER IS
BETTER THAN ANOTHER PRINTER. IT IS OUR INTENTION TO SAY WHICH
PRINTER SAMPLES WE LIKED BEST AND WHY. WHAT CONCLUSION YOU DRAW
FROM THESE DISCUSSIONS AND SAMPLES IS COMPLETELY UP TO YOU. ALL
RATINGS SHOWN ARE SUBJECTIVE AND REPRESENTS EACH INDIVIDUAL”S
OPINION ONLY.
You are cordially invited to visit our website and draw your own
conclusions about the samples presented there…
http://www.theNichols.net/Printer_Eval
--
I plan on living forever - so far so good!
--Has anyone else experienced this? The site is designed to have the
pages be 640 pixels wide (except for pages with rows of
images/crops.) So, if the text is much wider than 640 I have a bug
and would appreciate any feedback which could give me some hints. I
have tried several different systems and browsers and so far the
only issue is with older versions of Netscape causing a server
error (I am still working on that one.)
TIA,
Frank
--Alfred Voegels would like to call your attention to an evaluation
of print samples from several of today’s popular photo printers.
The evaluation started here at dpreview in the thread
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=3126587
where Alfred decided that in order to make an informed buying
decision he would ask readers of dpreview to send him some samples
of their printers. This call for samples resulted in several
volunteers sending in samples and some of us reviewed and evaluated
those samples. The result of this evaluation is available online in
a web site we created for this purpose.
WE DO NOT CLAIM THIS EVALUATION IS SCIENTIFIC OR HAS ANY MERIT
WHAT-SO-EVER. IT IS NOT OUR INTENTION TO SAY THAT ONE PRINTER IS
BETTER THAN ANOTHER PRINTER. IT IS OUR INTENTION TO SAY WHICH
PRINTER SAMPLES WE LIKED BEST AND WHY. WHAT CONCLUSION YOU DRAW
FROM THESE DISCUSSIONS AND SAMPLES IS COMPLETELY UP TO YOU. ALL
RATINGS SHOWN ARE SUBJECTIVE AND REPRESENTS EACH INDIVIDUAL”S
OPINION ONLY.
You are cordially invited to visit our website and draw your own
conclusions about the samples presented there…
http://www.theNichols.net/Printer_Eval
--
I plan on living forever - so far so good!
I plan on living forever - so far so good!
Has anyone else experienced this? The site is designed to have the
pages be 640 pixels wide (except for pages with rows of
images/crops.) So, if the text is much wider than 640 I have a bug
and would appreciate any feedback which could give me some hints. I
have tried several different systems and browsers and so far the
only issue is with older versions of Netscape causing a server
error (I am still working on that one.)
TIA,
Frank
--Alfred Voegels would like to call your attention to an evaluation
of print samples from several of today’s popular photo printers.
The evaluation started here at dpreview in the thread
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1003&message=3126587
where Alfred decided that in order to make an informed buying
decision he would ask readers of dpreview to send him some samples
of their printers. This call for samples resulted in several
volunteers sending in samples and some of us reviewed and evaluated
those samples. The result of this evaluation is available online in
a web site we created for this purpose.
WE DO NOT CLAIM THIS EVALUATION IS SCIENTIFIC OR HAS ANY MERIT
WHAT-SO-EVER. IT IS NOT OUR INTENTION TO SAY THAT ONE PRINTER IS
BETTER THAN ANOTHER PRINTER. IT IS OUR INTENTION TO SAY WHICH
PRINTER SAMPLES WE LIKED BEST AND WHY. WHAT CONCLUSION YOU DRAW
FROM THESE DISCUSSIONS AND SAMPLES IS COMPLETELY UP TO YOU. ALL
RATINGS SHOWN ARE SUBJECTIVE AND REPRESENTS EACH INDIVIDUAL”S
OPINION ONLY.
You are cordially invited to visit our website and draw your own
conclusions about the samples presented there…
http://www.theNichols.net/Printer_Eval
--
I plan on living forever - so far so good!
I plan on living forever - so far so good!