OvinceZ
Senior Member
I put that photo through PhotoScape and it shows a lot of detail. Was curious what the 800 lens plus 1.4 reveals. Thanks for showing the original size.
--
http://ovincez.smugmug.com
--
http://ovincez.smugmug.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I read another post explaining the problem. I use Safari which is ICC aware. so I can see the difference. I probably need to get more informed on this.We've examined the images you posted, there's no difference in color (other than the fact that smugmug are embedding an sRGB profile and we aren't). There is a difference in sharpness, we don't do any additional sharpening when downsizing, where as it looks like smugmug do. JPEG compression wise both images have about the same amount of JPEG artifacts and are of very similar compression levels (the smugmug file is slightly larger because of the extra sharpening).
--
Phil Askey
Editor, dpreview.com
Great job of reacting to an opportunity. Definitely deserved to be photo of the day. Regarding your comments about the uninteresting f/g & sky, I think there is some detail in the f/g still to be uncovered maybe and if there had been a more interesting sky, it may have obscured the moon.
The following photo was the "Photo of the Day" on the local King 5 evening news (Seattle). It is last months "blue moon" rising over Mt. Baker. Taken with 7D and EF 300mm f2.8. I wasn't out to get a moon shot but when I looked over and saw the huge orb rising behind the mountain I was glad I had my 300mm lens already mounted and had just enough time to setup the shot. I wish the sky or foreground was more interesting though.
![]()
Winter stream in an Oak wooded valley, South Wales, UK.
Canon 300D, Sigma 28-70 EX F2.8. F6.3, 1/50 at ISO 100.
![]()
Regards
paulfromwales
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29492623@N04/
Fleurieu Peninsula, South Australia.
![]()
cheers
Bill
Gotta believe in something....believe I'll take another photo...
http://www.pbase.com/billrobinson
Thanks Ben. I had assumed it was Venus also but, consulting my astronomy software, I see that it is actually Antares (Mag. 1), the brightest star in the sky.I like your moon shot a lot and I also like teh first one with the limbs of the moon pointing at a planet, (Mercury or Venus?)
I'm not sure why but I cannot open the file with Zoombrowser, DPP or PS3. It must be the newness of the 1D MKIVThe original Raw file (about 20 mb) can be downloaded at http://www.box.net/shared/ozhcrrsdof
The extender is the canon ef 1.4x II