D-FA 100mm Macro WR first impressions

cre8unique

Member
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Location
Edinburgh, UK
Friday last week (Jan 15th) I received my new K-7 together with the 'smc Pentax D-FA 100mm Macro F2.8 WR' lens. And on Sunday (18th) I took this combo out for a first outing.

To be honest I didn't buy this lens primarily for its macro focussing. I've been thinking for a while that what I would really like is a short telephoto lens, roughly equivalent to a classic 135mm film lens, in Pentax's DA Limited range. When pentax announced the D-FA 100mm Macro WR it seemed like Pentax has answered my prayer (albeit in a slightly round about way!)

The lens is light-weight enough (340 grams) to be carried without problems even when macro focussing isn't required, and so its the ideal complement to my existing DA Limited lenses. I do have plans to make use of the 1:1 macro focussing of this lens, but for the most part it will just be a relatively light-weight 150mm (35mm equiv.) short telephoto lens.

So I now have two basic travel outfits: When I want to travel as light as possible I can take my 15, 21 and 70mm DA Ltds. And when I don't mind carrying a little extra I will replace the 70mm DA Ltd with the 50mm FA and the 100mm D-FA WR.

So what are my first impressions...?

Well, the first thing to say is that this is a truly beautiful piece of engineering from Pentax. Somehow Pentax have managed to combine extreme light weight (at 340 grams this lens is barely more than half the weight of competing products from Canon and Nikon) with all metal construction and confidence inspiring solidity. This is an impressive feat indeed!

Overall focusing was smooth and pleasant in both AF and MF modes. But I did find that if you set the lens to infinity and then try to focus on something a few centimetres away, the K-7 will often fail to find correct focus completely. You have to help things along my focusing roughly manually first. The fact that the lens features full-time manual focus over-ride even in AF mode makes this quick and easy however, and of course macro photography is rarely about capturing fast action!

More relevant to my anticipated use of this lens, I also found that the lens occasionally tries to move all the way from a distant to a near focus setting before moving back to the correct distant setting even when using the lens for normal photography. I suppose this is where a focus limiter to reduce the amount of potential focus travel would be really welcome. But this problem was only an occasional and minor annoyance.

Of course the previous D-FA 100mm macro lens shares this problem and you have to go back to the earlier FA 100mm macro to find a Pentax macro lens with a focus limiter.

Here are a couple of photographs from my first outing with the K-7 and D-FA WR combination:



http://www.flickr.com/photos/aspectsoflight/4281900378/



http://www.flickr.com/photos/aspectsoflight/4281868742/

------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Osborne
Edinburgh
http://www.cjo.info
 
Thank you for your report. It is getting difficult for me to watch these lenses without the funds to get one.
 
Sounds great, but why didn't they put a focus limiter on it a real pity IMO? It would have been a great macro & tele/portrait and weather sealed to boot.
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation
 
Maybe for many people a focus limiter switch would be nice,but for shooting Macro...mostly done in MF by many Macro shooter it's not a necessity.For my part i never use AF,so not a big deal for me.
--
Leopold
Pentax forever
http://smarcoux.zenfolio.com/
 
From my brief experience with a macro lens (!) it seems to me that a focus limiter on a macro lens is most useful when you using the macro lens for non-macro photography.

Because the D-FA WR lens is so light and convenient to carry, it works just as well as a normal short tele lens as it does as a macro lens. So it would be nice to have the focus limiter for normal photography rather than macro photography.

But I only had very occasional problems when using the D-FA WR for normal photography. I still found this lens very pleasant to use at all distances.

------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Osborne
Edinburgh
http://www.cjo.info
 
Does anybody know how the D-FA 100mm Macro WR compares to the Tamron 90mm 2,8 Di Macro?

I know that the Pentax has the quick shift (plus WR) and the Tamron the focus limiter; but is the image quality of the Pentax better?

Yannick
 
Hi,

sure for those who like to use AF for Macro subject (often not the best option) even a focus limiter can be useful as well as more distant subject.
--
Leopold
Pentax forever
http://smarcoux.zenfolio.com/
 
any Macro lens is very good at least,Macro lenses are the best lenses available from any brand in general.It's more a choice of focal lenght and like in this case do you need the focus limiter are the WR and metal design?

I've owned 5 Macro lenses over the years (now have 4 of them) and all are great Macro lens , just different in use because of their focal length.

Up to you,both are great choice.
--
Leopold
Pentax forever
http://smarcoux.zenfolio.com/
 
Does anybody know how the D-FA 100mm Macro WR compares to the Tamron 90mm 2,8 Di Macro?
Pentax SMC-D FA 100mm f/2.8 macro

http://www.photozone.de/pentax/129-pentax-smc-d-fa-100mm-f28-macro-review--test-report
Optical Quality:.......4/5
Mechanical Quality:..2.5/5
Price/Performance:..3/5
Warranty:...............1 year
Street Price:.......... US$806
.
.
.
Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 Di SP macro (Pentax)
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/362-tamron-af-90mm-f28-di-sp-macro-pentax-
Optical Quality:........4/5
Mechanical Quality:..3.5/5
Price/Performance:..5/5
Warranty:...............6 years
Street Price:.......... US$370

--

General 'Buck' Turgidson: 'Well, I'd like to hold off judgment on a thing like that, sir, until all the facts are in.' ( Dr. Strangelove , 1964)
 
Does anybody know how the D-FA 100mm Macro WR compares to the Tamron 90mm 2,8 Di Macro?
Pentax SMC-D FA 100mm f/2.8 macro

http://www.photozone.de/pentax/129-pentax-smc-d-fa-100mm-f28-macro-review--test-report
Optical Quality:.......4/5
Mechanical Quality:..2.5/5
except that the D FA WR version is much better in terms of build quality and focus mechanism!
Price/Performance:..3/5
Warranty:...............1 year
Street Price:.......... US$806
European street price (since Yannick is French) = 549 Euro or less (German price)
.
.
.
Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 Di SP macro (Pentax)
http://www.photozone.de/pentax/362-tamron-af-90mm-f28-di-sp-macro-pentax-
Optical Quality:........4/5
Mechanical Quality:..3.5/5
Price/Performance:..5/5
Warranty:...............6 years
Street Price:.......... US$370
370 Euro
--

General 'Buck' Turgidson: 'Well, I'd like to hold off judgment on a thing like that, sir, until all the facts are in.' ( Dr. Strangelove , 1964)
 
Leo I agree with you for shooting macro but even there since the Km I have often been using AF because it is so good, however this lense now with WR has so much more potential than just macro I'm thinking sports, landscape tele and portrait but all these are in the top half of the AF range and with a limiter focus would be fast ie no hunting.

My FA 100 2.8 has a limiter which is great but it is heavy, not DA and not WR nor round aperture blades for great dof, if this had a limiter I would buy one instantly - its a great looking lense.
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation
 
Does anybody know how the D-FA 100mm Macro WR compares to the Tamron 90mm 2,8 Di Macro?

I know that the Pentax has the quick shift (plus WR) and the Tamron the focus limiter; but is the image quality of the Pentax better?
Search here for posts by tcom (Dominique). She has recently posted some comparisons between this lens and the DFA 100/2.8. The other posts have referred you to Photozone to compare that lens to the Tamron: one thing PZ doesn't measure is contrast, at which the Pentax lenses excel. I have the Sigma 105 and not the Tamron 90 but they are usually regarded as comparable; my DA lenses all outshine the Sigma in contrast even though resolution is about equal.
--
Gerry


First camera 1953, first Pentax 1983, first DSLR 2006
http://www.pbase.com/gerrywinterbourne
 
Thanks all for the replies.

I didn't find the posts from Dominique but I found the post showing the bokeh difference between the old (the non WR) and new version of the 100 mm (the new is better). It also seem that the best bokeh is achieved with some Voigtlander lenses.

I have another (noobish) question. Both Pentax 100 mm and Tamron 90 mm are macro 1:1 lenses. Does this mean that both take the same photo at 1:1 ratio but that the 100 mm has a larger focus distance?

Yannick
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top