Fly to the moon

The link is not working here.

Anyway, I guess this tutorial is related to this thread http://www.dpreview.com/learn/Image_Techniques/Double_Exposures_01.htm
http://www.pbase.com/image/4911594

Yes. I know it's not big and not full moon. :-)
Great picture, but... what´s that "square" on the right side of the
moon?
How did you do it?

Alexandre
New 602
--
Claudio Ferreira
mail: [email protected]
pics: http://www.pbase.com/claudio_fln/root
ICQ: 14145545
 
thanks.

sorry abt the link. I del the pic and reupload. go here and take a look :-)
http://www.pbase.com/image/4922931
http://www.pbase.com/image/4911594

Yes. I know it's not big and not full moon. :-)
Great picture, but... what´s that "square" on the right side of the
moon?
How did you do it?

Alexandre
New 602
--
Claudio Ferreira
mail: [email protected]
pics: http://www.pbase.com/claudio_fln/root
ICQ: 14145545
 
Question, did you use the auto mode or manual? Good pic
Nancy-tgl
sorry abt the link. I del the pic and reupload. go here and take a
look :-)
http://www.pbase.com/image/4922931
http://www.pbase.com/image/4911594

Yes. I know it's not big and not full moon. :-)
Great picture, but... what´s that "square" on the right side of the
moon?
How did you do it?

Alexandre
New 602
--
Claudio Ferreira
mail: [email protected]
pics: http://www.pbase.com/claudio_fln/root
ICQ: 14145545
 
I use as mode. that's why use -ev
sorry abt the link. I del the pic and reupload. go here and take a
look :-)
http://www.pbase.com/image/4922931
http://www.pbase.com/image/4911594

Yes. I know it's not big and not full moon. :-)
Great picture, but... what´s that "square" on the right side of the
moon?
How did you do it?

Alexandre
New 602
--
Claudio Ferreira
mail: [email protected]
pics: http://www.pbase.com/claudio_fln/root
ICQ: 14145545
 
Marbo,

Yes it does. Problem is getting the eyepiece square to the lens. I took this with eyepiece projection using a Celestron C-90 up to the lens. You can see I was not square (parallel) to the eyepiece, as the terminator is pretty well in focus, but it isn't in focus as you look out to the lit side of the lunar surface. There are some adapters, but nothing for the 6900 or S602. Not sure about the 601. Nice shot of the Radio Observatory by the way!!



Original on Pbase at: http://www.pbase.com/image/2796070

Jay S.
Works even better with a telescope.
http://www.pbase.com/marbouk/astronomy

Marbo uk...
 
Ive found that seeting the camera sharpening to soft gives the best results when photgraphing the moon.....you can sharpen the amount you think looks best at a later date.

Also..........combining 2 or more images together using "layers" in paint shop pro reduces any noise present in the images...... I use the 5 frame continuous shooting mode...its VERY important that the camera orientation doesnt change between each exposure or the images wont align properly. Ive tried this with regular pictures and it works too, as long as the subject is perfectly still though

http://www.scopetronix.com make an adaptor for the fuji 602/6900, you can also get adaptors that screw into the tripod socket......and then attach to the telescope....would be a solution for cameras without a threaded lens barrel etc.

Steven
 
Steve,

Thanks. Didn't know about the adapter. I'll check it out. I also posted a reply (seconding some of your thoughts), in another thread..

Jay S.
Ive found that seeting the camera sharpening to soft gives the best
results when photgraphing the moon.....you can sharpen the amount
you think looks best at a later date.

Also..........combining 2 or more images together using "layers" in
paint shop pro reduces any noise present in the images...... I use
the 5 frame continuous shooting mode...its VERY important that the
camera orientation doesnt change between each exposure or the
images wont align properly. Ive tried this with regular pictures
and it works too, as long as the subject is perfectly still though

http://www.scopetronix.com make an adaptor for the fuji 602/6900, you can
also get adaptors that screw into the tripod socket......and then
attach to the telescope....would be a solution for cameras without
a threaded lens barrel etc.

Steven
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top