henryk1
Senior Member
B&H doesn't suck. The Bears suck. The Cubs suck. And that is all I have to say on that subject.
--
http://www.hkisorphoto.blogspot.com
--
http://www.hkisorphoto.blogspot.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bottom line: "Sucks" is not vulgar. Anyone who claims otherwise is seriously misinformed, lives an extremely sheltered life, or has a very dirty mind.Maybe if you don't use it right. The proper expression is for instance "that sucks axx" or "that sucks bxxxs". "That sucks" is merely an abbreviated form, everyone knows it ain't lollypops your talking about. BTW I wouldn't say it in front of my mom either.I guess you don't like it anywhere, because "suck" is extremely common for "stink." > It's used on television shows, commercials, just about everywhere you go. And as > someone pointed out earlier with a citation for an academic paper, there is nothing > vulgar or obscene about its use.
--Nope, check their hours of operation and even waited an hour after they opened before calling. They were definately open !
That's perhaps a bit too broad a brush with which to paint...Bottom line: "Sucks" is not vulgar. Anyone who claims otherwise is seriously misinformed, lives an extremely sheltered life, or has a very dirty mind.
Dunno about that.... Even some of George Carlin's "Seven dirty words" have now been used on TV:Heck, during the Boston Red Sox' 2004 World Series parade one of the Duck boats had a T-shirt displayed that said "Yankees Suck." Nobody -- not even the news media -- made any mention of the phrase or censored it. And you can bet the Red Sox would not have put such a thing up if it in any way was considered obscene.
--GregOn October 31, 2008, Philadelphia Phillies second baseman Chase Utley took the stage at Citizens Bank Park during the team's World Series celebration and said "World champions. World f_cking champions!" Utley's epithet was aired live on almost every television station in the Philadelphia television market. The FCC took no action.
My mother used the word regularly whenever the situation justified it (and before anyone runs their emouth about my mother, she currently occupies a box on my sister's bookshelf). The only Priest I was ever introduced to is the one who molested my father as a child. Don't have any kids but I don't think the dog is offended by the word.That's perhaps a bit too broad a brush with which to paint...Bottom line: "Sucks" is not vulgar. Anyone who claims otherwise is seriously misinformed, lives an extremely sheltered life, or has a very dirty mind.
Personally, I don't consider myself "seriously misinformed," I do not live "an extremely sheltered life," and I do not have "a very dirty mind." OK, maybe a LITTLE dirty....
But frankly, I think "sucks" is a little vulgar. I wouldn't use it in front of my mom, or my priest, or my kids.
On your scale, in the context used here, the word doesn't even make the scale. If it were used as a verb to describe an act in reference to some one, then yes, I could see a 6 or 7.Maybe we should have a "vulgarity scale." Say, if the F-bomb was a 10, and "darn!" was a 1, where would you put "sucks"?
I'd give it a 6, maybe a 7. Well, maybe a 5 or a 6.
My email address is in my forum profile here.
--
Henry Posner
B&H Photo-Video
Eggs, probably. Like a weasel. (I'm not making that up.)Maybe if you don't use it right. The proper expression is for instance "that sucks axx" or "that sucks bxxxs". "That sucks" is merely an abbreviated form, everyone knows it ain't lollypops your talking about.
Whoa! Hold your horses, redbird! The term "obscene" had not been brought up until this post of yours, as far as I recall. I apologize if it has and I missed it.…such a thing up if it in any way was considered obscene.
You think "darn" is vulgar?!Personally, I don't consider myself "seriously misinformed," I do not live "an extremely sheltered life," and I do not have "a very dirty mind." OK, maybe a LITTLE dirty....
But frankly, I think "sucks" is a little vulgar. I wouldn't use it in front of my mom, or my priest, or my kids.
Maybe we should have a "vulgarity scale." Say, if the F-bomb was a 10, and "darn!" was a 1, where would you put "sucks"?
First, the FCC needs to receive a complaint. Second, a vulgarity uttered on live television by someone with no ties to the medium would not warrant punishment for the television station anyway.To quote from that article:Heck, during the Boston Red Sox' 2004 World Series parade one of the Duck boats had a T-shirt displayed that said "Yankees Suck." Nobody -- not even the news media -- made any mention of the phrase or censored it. And you can bet the Red Sox would not have put such a thing up if it in any way was considered obscene.
On October 31, 2008, Philadelphia Phillies second baseman Chase Utley took the stage at Citizens Bank Park during the team's World Series celebration and said "World champions. World f_cking champions!" Utley's epithet was aired live on almost every television station in the Philadelphia television market. The FCC took no action.
"Vulgar" and "obscene" are synonyms. And in the context of this discussion, a claim has been made that "sucks" refers to oral sex. So we're not talking about "vulgar" in the context of your example.Whoa! Hold your horses, redbird! The term "obscene" had not been brought up until this post of yours, as far as I recall. I apologize if it has and I missed it.…such a thing up if it in any way was considered obscene.
Vulgar is by no means always obscene. For instance, many composers and other musicians have referred to the sound of the saxophone as vulgar (I happen to concur) but I don't think it's necessarily "obscene".
Sigh…"Vulgar" and "obscene" are synonyms.
It's in the plan section.Hi,
Your forum profile lists the b&h website address and below this states: "This user has chosen not to disclose their email address"
Thought you should know of this little discrepancy.
Since you offer no alternative source, my cousin's "expertise" wins the day.Your authoritative source is a high school senior in the 1970s? Really?
I feel sorry for any children whom you might raise. They will be at a considerable disadvantage in social discourse because they will have been taught by you that only their own opinion and comfort matters, and that etiquette, manners, speech, and the comfort of others is irrelevant.Seriously. It's only vulgar because people really want it to be, when they want to be shocked and offended.
I think your reply is a demonstration of what some respondents have been saying.You're kidding right?![]()
It's in the "plan" section.
No alternative source is necessary; a high school student's say-so counts for zilch.Since you offer no alternative source, my cousin's "expertise" wins the day.Your authoritative source is a high school senior in the 1970s? Really?
While "sucks" won't fly in an essay, college paper, or op-ed column, it is a commonly used expression in everyday language that means, quite simply, "no good." There is no more to it, unless, of course, you want to pretend it's vulgar.I feel sorry for any children whom you might raise. They will be at a considerable disadvantage in social discourse because they will have been taught by you that only their own opinion and comfort matters, and that etiquette, manners, speech, and the comfort of others is irrelevant.Seriously. It's only vulgar because people really want it to be, when they want to be shocked and offended.