Pieter Missiaen
Well-known member
Over the past year I have grown aware of the advantages of monitor calibration, and so last week I bought the Spyder 3 Pro tool, and am trying to set it up properly. On the other hand I am not a professional, so I can't set up a complete office for photo editing and just try to do what I have. I am reasoning that any step in the right direction is at least that.
However, the spyder measures the normal ambient lighting in my office as "very high". Apparently that is totally unsuitable for photo editing, but I need at least that much light for my regular work. If I switch off the overhead lights, the ambient light drops to "Medium", which is acceptable for photo editing on an LCD. So I decided to calibrate my screen with the overheads switched off, and to also switch them off whenever I am editing images and the calibration really matters. Does this sound reasonable, or are there better solutions?
However, the spyder measures the normal ambient lighting in my office as "very high". Apparently that is totally unsuitable for photo editing, but I need at least that much light for my regular work. If I switch off the overhead lights, the ambient light drops to "Medium", which is acceptable for photo editing on an LCD. So I decided to calibrate my screen with the overheads switched off, and to also switch them off whenever I am editing images and the calibration really matters. Does this sound reasonable, or are there better solutions?