Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Luke most of what you say, the 'name calling' seems to be a figment of your imagination.I'm Bored of this.
On top of constantly contradicting yourself, inventing "facts" and showing an inability to comprehend written English. You now resort to Name calling...
You win. The name calling obviously trumps evidence, facts or logic.
Luke ...
I didYou meant "Brad"...
You areI'm Luke
IMO it seems clear that all aspects except the fact that the connects are on 2 sides is different. You need to know how a package like that is made and what components it is made of. Then you can understand that those are very much different.The other thing is that the Canon 5D mk II's sensor package is remarkably similar to the D3/D3s and therefore I conclude that the Nikon D3/D3s/D700 family of sensors are made in Canon fabs or use Canon IP and thats why Nikon is so secretive.. Kidding Kidding! I do not know that. It just stuck me that they were so similar.
Unfortunately, pixelpepper is no longer with us. I've taken up the conch, as it were.Thank you, PixelPepper and Thom for contributing. Your posts made very interesting reading.
I'm not sure this is right. Looking at the firmware copyright notices, they mention the Fujitsu FR series, which is not SPARC. None of the FR has enough throughput to do this job, but I would guess that the FR-V very long instruction word processor does (it was designed for image processing). The FR is also used in Pentax cameras, and the new Leicas have an FR/FR-V on one chip ( http://www.electropages.com/viewArticle.aspx?intArticle=11618 ). IMO, it's very likely that the chip labelled EXPEED is very similar.There's interesting things in there such as finding out that Canon uses ARM and Nikon uses the SPARC.
DIGIC and DIGICII VxWorks, DIGIC III and IV, DryOS (see http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/For_Developers - a host of interesting information about Canon internals, if only there was a NHDK)I've always wanted a SPARC workstation and now I get one in my D700. Its also interesting to know in the firmware debate that Fujitsu's RTOS is based on micro-itron so its really cool to own something thats based on tron. Does anyone know what's the OS that's running on Canon's ARM chips?
The most striking thing is all the output lands being at the end of the chip. They both also lack the complex circuitry round the edges that the D3x/A900 chip has for its digital output. The choice of a 'CCD style' analog output is also similar. Note pixelpepper's hunch that both had roots in Mitsubishi design practice.The other thing is that the Canon 5D mk II's sensor package is remarkably similar to the D3/D3s and therefore I conclude that the Nikon D3/D3s/D700 family of sensors are made in Canon fabs or use Canon IP and thats why Nikon is so secretive.. Kidding Kidding! I do not know that. It just stuck me that they were so similar.
Not enough yet on the 1DIV. From Marianne Oelund's measurements, the D3s seems to be something of a breakthrough in terms of quantum efficiency, more than 30% above the D3, which was already the best in the business. It's read noise seems to have been about halved, as well, which would put it on a par with the 5DII and 50D.Could you also comment on how the Canon 1D mk IV's sensor compares with the Nikon D3s from a technical point of view such as read noise and architecture and share info on Panasonic's nMos sensors if you have any. It would be really interesting reading.