I believe the 5DMKII was cleverly positioned in the market as there were a variety of customers to target.
I would say a lot of the people who bought a 5dMKII were already multiple body, 1D crop sports shooters who wanted a FF body to compliment their line up. They avoided the 5D due to dust as they worked in that environment already and had no need for the expensive 1DS body. I'm certainly in that catergory.
Then there are those 'established' photographers (landscape/wedding) who wanted to update/replace/compliment their 5D's - they may have bought more than one body.
Yet another group may have bought it as their one and only FF body as the 1DS was out of reach due to cost.
Last but not least were those after the high quality video function alone - I know several wedding photogs who did so.
Canon had a fair selection to choose from and I'm also guessing that a lot of the people who purchased the 5DMKII were not interested in a hybrid, mythical 3D.
It seems the group who were pro hybrid, FF, 3D are the most vocal against the 5DMKII.
Zoooming
Zoooming
I would say a lot of the people who bought a 5dMKII were already multiple body, 1D crop sports shooters who wanted a FF body to compliment their line up. They avoided the 5D due to dust as they worked in that environment already and had no need for the expensive 1DS body. I'm certainly in that catergory.
Then there are those 'established' photographers (landscape/wedding) who wanted to update/replace/compliment their 5D's - they may have bought more than one body.
Yet another group may have bought it as their one and only FF body as the 1DS was out of reach due to cost.
Last but not least were those after the high quality video function alone - I know several wedding photogs who did so.
Canon had a fair selection to choose from and I'm also guessing that a lot of the people who purchased the 5DMKII were not interested in a hybrid, mythical 3D.
It seems the group who were pro hybrid, FF, 3D are the most vocal against the 5DMKII.
Zoooming
--You're right, but I meant something less descriptive. ;-) I know the meaning, but wanted some nice English word (mind you, I'm not the native speaker)."enjoyment obtained from the troubles of others" I believe is what it means.
Of course, they buy 5D2 because they have nothing else. How many of them would buy EOS-3 digital if available, or EOS-D700 if available?I hear what you say but the sheer number of happy 5DMKII users and the huge backlog of those wanting to be a user some how tells a story.
That reminds me of the old joke that there was a great choice in the paradise already, when God brought Eve before Adam and said: "Select the woman you like the most." ;-)
--Zoooming
Well I bet the people who can afford contemporary 1D are happy.Them and us - both happy - customer and supplier. Good for business.
Even though I must admit I felt a litte of "schadenfreude" (what's the english translation of this german word anyway?), when Canon let them have some the same AF "quality" with the Mk3 that the non-1D users "enjoy" with every model, unless they shoot easy stuff.
Bad karma somehow seems to work.
--Zoooming
Canon marketing department?And there's a fair crowd out there who are happy with the fact they 'protect' (as you say) the 1D series and will continue to do so.
--Zoooming
I doubt so. They simply decided to protect 1D at all costs. And still they do.Perhaps 1) Canon simply wanted to save manufacturing costs so it can lower the price of the 5D2....maybe they had some forecast about the 2) recession. And, canon also knew that 3) Sony will come with a fairly low priced 24MP camera. Considering these three factors, I think it was maybe not a bad idea.You mean, like put the great sensor to the inferior-AF-crippled* body again? I wouldn't be surprised.
* 10 years after EOS-3, 5D2 AF was nothing but intentional cripple to protect the 1D line. Canon just tried to pretend that there was no advance in the AF technology for the prosumers class. Period.
--
Cheers,
Martin
![]()
Cheers,
Martin
![]()
Cheers,
Martin
![]()
Cheers,
Martin
![]()
Zoooming