What 2 electron says about the "sad state of film" is that it's even sadder than we thought...
The cine division of Kodak developed the two electron sensitizing film, and it took years for it to migrate from there to the still photography side of Kodak. The still photography business used to drive film development.
And we're just in time to see the bottom drop out of cinema.
There are 140,000 screens worldwide. Putting together data from the DCI and Cinema Buyer's Guide
That's 60% per year growth
100% of theaters should be digital by 2014.
I'd say that's about as long as the color film business (still and cine combined) at Kodak and Fuji has got. It will take a lot more time for color film to totally die, folks like Lucky are going to go on for quite a while...
But I think we've seen the last technological advances in film, and we're just five years from being thrown back a decade or two in technology.
This could very well be true. Glad I like B&W better ;-)
Same here.
Even better, there seems to be a tolerable eastern European replacement for my favorite, Tech Pan. Now that stuff is seriously "old school". Kodak just took note of how many people were using the old "Kodak High Contrast Copy Film" (and Agfa Copex microfilm) in a phenidone developer, whipped up their own pnenidone developer, and rebranded HCCF as "Technical Pan".
Some say "Gigabit" and "Bluefire" actually are AGFA Copex, others say it's a really good imitation, but you can't argue with the results. And that's an emulsion over 1/2 century old.
(I learned about Harold Holden and Arnold Weichert "Control" developer when I was around 12. Aaron Sussman (Susmann?) talked it up glowingly in "The Amateur Photographer's Handbook". You could renew a book every two weeks indefinitely at the Livonia Public Library, unless someone put a hold on it. I kept that book checked out for the entire summer of 1974).
Now, what was this about me ruining every thread?