CNET Asia has 1D Mk IV High-ISO crops

efix

Senior Member
Messages
2,028
Reaction score
12
Location
DE
Who did take those utterly bad images ??

Do you think a brand could make avalable such sensitivities is the result would be this cr@p ??

Don't know who shot and what was the light used but to me this comparaison is totally irrelevant

--
Ludo from Paris
Tankers of tools, thimbles of talent
BestOf http://ludo.smugmug.com/gallery/1158249
 
These images are not even images. The worst review I think I will have ever seen. Take nothing from this. I even suspect these are images of images on the back of the screen zoomed into 100 percent.
--
1. The most powerful piece of equipment you own, will
never be placed in your camera bag. It sits solidly
between your ears.

2. While the right equipment is SOMETIMES required to
get the job done, if imagination is not applied, success
will seldom be obtained.
 
Looks like mobile phone camera images taken of the LCD screen. These are not from the camera.
 
http://asia.cnet.com/reviews/digitalcameras/0,39001468,45095238p,00.htm at the end of the page.

I wonder what use there is for 102,400 ISO, or if it, again, is just about high values ... But look for yourself.
I'll reserve my judgment until I've seen more samples (these could be underexposed), but what was posted is absolute garbage.

Right now, the D3s is the benchmark: http://imaging.nikon.com/products/imaging/lineup/digitalcamera/slr/d3s/sample.htm

Until I see something from the mkIV that is useful at higher ISO, the numbers being thrown around can't be taken seriously.
 
Those 12.800 ISO shots look like my 3200 ISO coming from a 5DmkII.

Nikon created nearly perfect NR algorithms and teamed with a FF 12mpix sensor, well, they still have the edge.

Let see what a Canon 1.3 cam can do, hopefully we'll have real samples soon.

--
Ludo from Paris
Tankers of tools, thimbles of talent
BestOf http://ludo.smugmug.com/gallery/1158249
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top