The 5D Mark II is a great camera, but I really feel that the 7D (with the exception of sensor size) is what the 5D Mark II should have been.
yes, but would you have been willing to wait until this year to get it?
in my case, yes, since it came out past the fall sports/foliage/wildlife/travel season anyway, maybe been worth waiting an extra year instead of now 2 more for a 3D. I guess wedding people did get an extra spring and summer season out of it, if not an extra fall. In some ways it does almost seem like since they waited that long they may as well have waited a bit longer. Then again the 1Ds4 is still not ready so they would've held until then which means like april '010 in stores and summer '10 available widely, so I guess that would be pretty long though....
it is a damn shame they had the 1ds3 holding them back, especially with all the gried the mkiii's got anyway.
i think their fear of protecting the absurd 1ds3 kinda put them into an impossible spot.
i guess the way to try to look at it is that at least with the dual-cam system you get more reach for wildlife in good lighting........
but it does hurt a bit to not have had some of the this stuff in the 5D2, which clearly, CLEARLY could have been, for $3000 or $3400 if they bumped the shutter/mirror to handle more than 4fps.
If they dumped this into it, their would've been the wildest raves and all the moon reveal would've been fully delivered.
The 5D2 seems to have just missed the cut-off where canon full out. I wasn't completely old canon in that they did give it the full 21MP sensor and not the old 16.7MP one as if they followed 5D footsteps directly, but they only brought it half-way. The 7D you can see they were going reasonably all out for a prosumer cam, ok they disabled or left out f/8 and f/4 precision, perhaps more tightly packed assist points and some raw buffer which even there give them right to boost the 1d4 price up, but they went way farther than they did with teh 5D2/50D/40D/30D.