New 50-200 WR

ozdean · Jun 1, 2009

I know we have noted that the new wr has gone from a 52mm filter thread to a 49 but did you note that the weight has gone from 9.2oz to 11.5oz. I can't imagine that's just seals so I do hope that it is glass.
Maybe they have lifted th performance to that of the Series II and 55-300?
Makes sense to suit the K7.
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation

ozdean · Jun 1, 2009

My mistake its 10.1 ( 11.5 is with hood) still it's an extra ounce, hopefully glass?
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation

MightyMike · Jun 1, 2009

from what i understand the optics haven't changed
--
Mike from Canada

'I like to think so far outside the box that it would require a telephoto lens just to see the box!' ~ 'My Quote

'

http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?sort_order=views%20DESC&first_this_page=0&page_limit=180&&emailsearch=mighty_mike88%40hotmail.com&thumbnails=

JoeDaBassPlayer · Jun 1, 2009

MightyMike said:
from what i understand the optics haven't changed
--
Mike from Canada

'I like to think so far outside the box that it would require a
telephoto lens just to see the box!' ~ 'My Quote '

http://www.airliners.net/search/photo.search?sort_order=views%20DESC&first_this_page=0&page_limit=180&&emailsearch=mighty_mike88%40hotmail.com&thumbnails=

--
Variance is Evil!

That is not too bad. My Zenitar 16 is about 10 oz. On the other hand, they managed to get the weight of the DAL50-200 down to 6 oz using the same optics! They lost the focus clutch and went to a polycarbonate mount. I take this lens with me all the time, unless I want my faster K135/2.5 instead.

alexmakowski · Jun 1, 2009

I've been following this forum carefully for over 2 1/2 years now, but the "WR" abbreviation has caught me by surprise. What does it mean?
--
Alex

maward · Jun 1, 2009

Weather Resistant, I believe.

Don't feel bad, I don't know what "LBA" is.

alexmakowski said:
I've been following this forum carefully for over 2 1/2 years now,
but the "WR" abbreviation has caught me by surprise. What does it
mean?
--
Alex

--
Marc Ward
Milwaukee, WI
http://www.pbase.com/mward
Canon 40D w/ Canon EFS 10-22

brandrx · Jun 1, 2009

--
Ron - 'We don't have time to go take pics this afternoon Carl.'
Carl - 'What do you mean? It will only take 1/1000s.'

'Keep your eyes looking forward. However, glance back now and then to see where you've come from. It will put a smile on your face.' ~ brandrx

Ron ~ Retired.

Britney Elvis · Jun 1, 2009

maward said:
Weather Resistant, I believe.

Don't feel bad, I don't know what "LBA" is.

maward said:
Marc Ward

And I hope for your sake... you never do!

It is like PF or CA... I never saw it in a photo until I asked what it was, Now it is everywhere...
--

Gus --- There are none so blind as those who had no chance to see... stop censoring photos!

BOONER · Jun 1, 2009

LBA = Lens Buying Addiction (NT)

--
http://pentaxphotogallery.com/peterlabun
http://booner.smugmug.com/

Britney Elvis · Jun 1, 2009

BOONER said:
LBA = Lens Buying Addiction (NT)

You just had to do it! 8^)

It's all over for poor Marc now.

--

Gus --- There are none so blind as those who had no chance to see... stop censoring photos!

maward · Jun 1, 2009

Good Lord! I must have it, as I am looking to buy a lens or three for a camera I don't even have (yet).

--
Marc Ward
Milwaukee, WI
http://www.pbase.com/mward
Canon 40D w/ Canon EFS 10-22

Britney Elvis · Jun 1, 2009

You got it then!
--

Gus --- There are none so blind as those who had no chance to see... stop censoring photos!

Marc Sabatella · Jun 1, 2009

alexmakowski said:
I've been following this forum carefully for over 2 1/2 years now,
but the "WR" abbreviation has caught me by surprise. What does it
mean?

As others noted, Weather Resistant. New versions of both the 18-55 and 50-200, announced along with the K-7 - I assume you didn't miss that announcement!

--
Marc Sabatella
http://www.marcsabatella.com/
Blog: http://marcsabatella.blogspot.com/
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcsabatella/

ozdean · Jun 1, 2009

Nothing worse than having a disease, not knowing you have it, then finding out the name for it and you realize everybody has it anyway - so who cares!
You got it!
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation

ozdean · Jun 1, 2009

I'm hoping they have Mike.
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation

gustabod · Jun 1, 2009

same speed etc as the old one, although the WR looks a bit chunkier, could be body mass rather than optics.

--
gustavo

http://www.pbase.com/gustabod

Marc Sabatella · Jun 2, 2009

ozdean wrote:
[ re: changed optics]

ozdean said:
I'm hoping they have Mike.

John Carlson specifically said in another thread they didn't change the optics.

--
Marc Sabatella
http://www.marcsabatella.com/
Blog: http://marcsabatella.blogspot.com/
Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/marcsabatella/

ozdean · Jun 3, 2009

Thanks Mark, I hope he's not right but guess he is reliable. It's definitely a different filter thread size 52 to 49.
--
Regards Dean - Capturing Creation

Pete Dee · Jun 3, 2009

Britney Elvis said:
BOONER said:

LBA = Lens Buying Addiction (NT)

Click to expand...

You just had to do it! 8^)

It's all over for poor Marc now.

--
Gus --- There are none so blind as those who had no chance to see...
stop censoring photos!

--
So what is worse, LBA or CBA? ;-)

alexmakowski · Jun 3, 2009

My LBA is incurable, my doctors (and wife) tell me. I already have the 18-55 and 50-200 ranges covered with good glass and didn't notice the new lenses when I read the K-7 announcement.

--
Alex

New 50-200 WR

Forum Pro

Forum Pro

Forum Pro

Senior Member

Well-known member

Active member

Forum Pro

Veteran Member

Well-known member

Veteran Member

Active member

Veteran Member

Veteran Member

Forum Pro

Forum Pro

Senior Member

Veteran Member

Forum Pro

Senior Member

Well-known member

Keyboard shortcuts