Reading mode: Light Dark

Sony HX1 new samples!

Go to last post
pritty useless ...stitching errors... doubles when moving subjects are in the frame....exposure in parts incorrect.

we have seen same things in many panorama shots so it cant be the user.

video seems nice ............but images well once again i'm not impressed with what has been shown on various websites.

--
  • living in harmony with nature and other beings...will create an better world for all * marti58 -2006
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marti58/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/worldwidefriendship/
 


marti in another post you were wondering if sony hx1 can achieve nikon p90 detail and you showed us a heavily resized p90 sample
well here is the real thing
ahh sorry the left is the sony and right is nikon
poor nikon :(
 
remember that p90 is 64 iso
and sony is TWICE 125 iso
and sony is still much better

enjoy :)
 


this is an iso 400 comparison

so I am very happy to say that Sony Hx1 IS MUCH better from nikon p90 which seems good to some people here
 
843 said:
As Marti58 commented on the obvious, akaloith upped the ante.
akaloith starts using personal attacks, while our great veteran can
only sigh...
Click to expand...
he posted the pano ....i commented.

do i care... no i dont give a .... i said the video option looks good but that would not be the reason for me to buy such camera.

if a MGF is advertising with stunning panorama's.... well fill in the answer.

i have my personal opinion on them nothing more nothing less.

i fail to see the stunning part .......in any of the posted pano's.

so i stay with my point... lack of sharpness/stitching errors/ incorrect exposures.

we have seen pano's from various websites/reviews all posted by aka....

--
  • living in harmony with nature and other beings...will create an better world for all * marti58 -2006
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marti58/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/worldwidefriendship/
 
please comment the p90 hx1 comparison
you liked p90

why dont you comment hx1 in comparison to p90?

who cares about the fu_ ing pano when the camera has better detail, better video, better high iso from a camera you already said that you liked its samples and you thought that sony hx1 cant do the same
Well i show that it can do MUCH BETTER

people here stick to the tree and cant see the wood, pity...
 
I can very easily copy paste the same things again and again and again and again
I can very easily pretend to be the ultimate judge of samples
thats not the point!

I just post samples. comparisons, reviews etc and its very boring people copying and pasting the same stuff again and again and again
 
akaloith said:
people here stick to the tree and cant see the wood, pity...
Click to expand...
That would be because you are posting separate posts every 5 minutes. Keep the thread readable and put similar things in one (1) post. That way we could be able to see some wood in this thread.

If you haven't noticed: there is an edit button that allows you to re-edit a post you made. The edit button is visible for 15 minutes after you have saved your post.

--
http://geetwee.redbubble.com
 


ANOTHER PANORAMA
VERTICAL THIS TIME.

MANY CAMERAS WOULD WISH TO HAVE SUCH A "USELESS BY SOME" FEATURE
keep on judging without seeing.
enjoy ;)
 
It'd be better if you just post the samples, without comments. Let us decide whether it's awesome or horrible, will you?

Don't compare it with the junk that is P90. Compare it with Canon G10 or Lumix LX3.

--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/843/
 
It'd be better if you just post the samples, without comments. Let us decide whether it's awesome or horrible, will you?

Is panasonic lx3 and canon g10 superzooms?
you can actually compare it to a slr if that suits you

And about the commenting the photos has anyone told you that i post photos here so as to be commented by clueless people like you?
who cant even compare the correct cameras and not totaly irrelevant?

The most clueless people in here are always judging the photos and comparing to totaly irelevant cameras. Way to go!
 
akaloith said:
Is panasonic lx3 and canon g10 superzooms?
you can actually compare it to a slr if that suits you
Click to expand...
No, but they are compacts. SLR is a different class, you should know that. There is little point comparing ugly images with other ugly images. People who buy superzooms should accept the fact that IQ is going to be compromised. You want to compare superzooms? Try Canon SX10 IS and Panasonic FZ28.
akaloith said:
And about the commenting the photos has anyone told you that i post
photos here so as to be commented by clueless people like you?
Click to expand...
I don't get what you're saying. I take it English isn't your strong point.
akaloith said:
who cant even compare the correct cameras and not totaly irrelevant?
The most clueless people in here are always judging the photos and
comparing to totaly irelevant cameras. Way to go!
Click to expand...
The most cluelest people are those who completely ignore criticism to products they love. You don't work for Sony. You don't own the HX1. Why do you try so hard?

--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/843/
 


ANOTHER PANORAMA
VERTICAL THIS TIME.

MANY CAMERAS WOULD WISH TO HAVE SUCH A "USELESS BY SOME" FEATURE
keep on judging without seeing.
keep on copying pasting the same again and again and not seeing the reality
enjoy ;)
 
the comparison of a superzoom 20x with 1/2,3 sensor to a 2x or 6x with 1/1,6 sensor was exactly what i needed to make me not read again another silly comment
keep on beeing miserable, i am not
and keep on comparing totaly irelevant cameras

maybe you should tell dpreview to also compare hx1 to lx3 and g10
but in fact they will compare it to sx1, p90, z980 and all these superzooms
and guess who is the winner
 
as u seem to know everything better then others.... ur just pathetic and nothing else .......u keep stirring trouble.

u should wait till the review is out from some real realistic sites......my bet u will be dissapointed big time.

u keep posting links to sites that show so so pictures and keep claiming the Sony is best ........hmmm.

calling people clueless .........who have been shooting H camera's for a very longtime ...........well i guess u will get loads of friends in here.

one last thing i wanna say to u ........we have seen such behavior before.

--
  • living in harmony with nature and other beings...will create an better world for all * marti58 -2006
http://www.flickr.com/photos/marti58/
http://www.flickr.com/groups/worldwidefriendship/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ProfHankD
I would go 500mm and I would go 500 more
Replies
1
Views
32K
Tom Caldwell
T
M
From the past, to the future.
Replies
12
Views
3K
Tom Caldwell
T
Alex Ethridge
Acronyms used in photography
2
Replies
27
Views
13K
Guy Parsons
Guy Parsons
E
Testing the Sony 70-350mm with comparisons to Sony 70-300mm
Replies
10
Views
9K
Ed Church
E
ProfHankD
Are cheap old lenses still IQ-competitive with midrange new?
3 4 5
Replies
93
Views
1K
M_digicapt
M

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top