requesting critical reviews please...

Nelson Plude

Member
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Location
US
Hi all, new to DSLR photography here, converting over from digital video to stills. Just got the D90 with the 18-200 lens. First pictures posted – I hope, (this is my first post).

These pictures, (if displayed...) were shot with different modes, (mostly aperture and all handheld). Requesting critical reviews and if you have a quick second, a quick suggestion(s) as to what I should do to correct the noticeable deficiencies

Not that it matters but don’t worry about hurting my feelings too much as I understand I have a ways to go with this. Thanks in advance.

























--
Nelson...
 
Well - sorry. Right off I can see that these pictures are waaaay to large. I will correct that next time. Sorry about that, first-timer...
--
Nelson
 
  1. 2 and #3 stand out the most. The other ones didn't do anything for me at all.
The main problem I had with all these shots was subject selection. Not very interesting to me.

just my 2cents

--
David



http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoeng/
 
  1. 2 and #3 stand out the most. The other ones didn't do anything for
me at all.
The main problem I had with all these shots was subject selection.
Not very interesting to me.

just my 2cents

--
David
Thanks, I understand what you are saying there. Mostly, I am wishing to know if the photos need, are or are lacking in other ways. You know, am I doing anything wrong that I need to correct in order to improve the picture quality. Thanks.

--
Nelson
 
The obvious has already been said, pictures too large and too many, but you now know that. The images are beautifully taken, well composed and exposed. But, they could stand considerable cropping. The second picture of the flower is delightful but the background has far too many distracting elements. Same goes for most of the others. You've demonstrated your cropping prowess with a couple of the insect shots, so go for it. Sometimes less is more.
Regards.
--
Charles.
Nikon D40x, 18-105VR, 50mm f1.8, Capture NX2.



'Don't let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do.' --John Wooden
 
For the macros I would try to crop down to one subject like the one with the bee on the flower and not much else. I like the cat pic. Remember the rule of thirds, it helps in most instances.
--
(X)Mr. Kelly M
( )Ms.
( )Mrs.

 
Looks like you added some gaussian blur to the background (or oversharpened the foreground)... the halos are really apparent.

Switching from video to photo...I don't do any video, but image the compostiional thing that would be the most annoying is learning to see what will end up being a visial distraction... with moving subjects it's easier for the brain to edit out something from how it visualizes a scene, whereas with photos everything stands still and what you didn't notice in the viewfinder stands out in print.
 
While the 18-200vr is a very versatile lens with many advantages, several of the shots you used it for here reveal its weaknesses. It tends to be rather soft at full tele, and it's definitely not meant for macro work. You did a pretty good job catching those critters, but a proper macro lens, one in the 105mm neighborhood, would have been much better. In addition, though I didn't have time to download your photos and examine the EXIF, your exposure settings do not seem optimum for catching bees on the fly. All that said, not bad for a first attempt. Keep at it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Rule of Thirds is meant to be broken, but only 1/3 of the time.



D80/D90 photos: http://esfotoclix.com
 
Too much PP on the flower/bee pics. Keep it a bit more natural, get in closer, and use DOF in the lens rather than blurring in software.
 
I know this has already been covered but, twelve pictures are far too many, the forum rules state, “Posting many pictures - Do not post many pictures in one message, instead post a link to a gallery. Posting several messages with just one image in each in a short period will be treated as SPAM - it will be deleted” so restrict the number to just a few. Continued posting of this many pictures will get the thread moved to the Challenges and Galleries forum, and possibly get you banned.

Your galleries are apparently private so there is no way to check the exif data for your pictures. You should include the exif data so people can see what setting you used and make informed suggestions on settings changes.

The first picture is cluttered, far too many things to look at. It appears that the camera focused on the seedpod on the right side of the image rather than on the bee. The picture also looks very noisy which could be caused from underexposure or high ISO or both. If the light isn’t good, and I don’t see any shadows to speak of, pop up the flash.

As eNo has already stated, the 18-200 isn’t your best choice for close-up photography, which is one reason I went with the 18-105 (which is actually pretty good for close-ups), the other being I already had the 70-300 which is much better at 200mm than is the 18-200.

I’d strive for a narrower DOF (Depth Of Field) so the background isn’t in focus and the user doesn’t spend time looking at it. Opening the aperture has the added benefit of allowing you to reduce the ISO when the light isn’t what you want.

I did some very quick edit to demonstrate how this picture might look with a narrower DOF and what I think is better composition with less clutter. It is very difficult to duplicate a narrow DOF using PP – you are much better off using the camera and lens to achieve the effect.



Do a Google search on composition and learn a little about some of the rules. A good place to start is the Rule of Thirds, just don’t regard it as law, it is more a guideline than a rule or law, and sometimes maybe you want a Rule of Fourths – don’t get hang-up sticking exactly to thirds. There are times when you definitely want to ignore it – but most of the time it is good to have the Rule of Thirds in mind when you are composing your shot.
 
In my humble opinion, these shots look, collectively, like a bunch of snapshots you took to try out your camera. Hand held shots with a telephoto lens for close ups is always gonna get you into trouble if you're looking for sharpness. As one poster said, not the best choice of lens for macro work.
--
John
 
Hi Nelson and welcome aboard!...

I've seen countless D90 and 18-200mm pics in this forum and I won't beat about the bush, I'll be straight in my CC if it is to be effective. I honestly think there is either something wrong with your cam and/or lens, or you are doing something very wrong with them.

I have never handled a D90 or a copy of your lens so I don't know their characteristics but I cannot believe that this is the best they can produce even in the very few test shots of a new user with no dSLR experience as you have said. This is NOT a personal criticism, it is just a suspicion that you somehow used your tools incorrectly. I am sure you'll soon be getting similar beautiful pics to the ones other D90 owners display here.

To get to that level, existing experienced owners (with all due respect to them) have to talk straight and politely point out where you might have gone wrong, instead of politely avoiding the issue and making comments on composition and content.

I would say to our D90 experienced friends: "forget the content and talk about the technical aspects". This is after all what the OP asked for. I can see too many blown highlights, too much softness, too much out of focus, a lot of blotches and noise in almost all of the images (except perhaps the one with the flags).

If you can post the Exif data of some of the shots, I am sure there is all the expertise in this forum to pinpoint the possible pitfall. I'll be very interested to hear their considered opinions too, because I'm no expert either. Only this way you'll be any wiser in the end...
Keep at it... :)
--
Regards
Sunshine (Fuji F31, S6500, OLY C4000Z, Canon EOS1000, Nikon D60+2 kit lenses)
 
It is exceedingly hard to look at a photo on the forum, when there is no supporting data, and tell the shooter what was done wrong. I mentioned in my post that the exif data is needed, it would also be nice to know what the lighting conditions were at the time, i.e. somewhat overcast, very overcast, hazy, bright sun, in the shade, etc. But without this data it is really hard to give meaningful constructive advice. But regardless of the technical merits of the pictures, or the lack there of, the composition is clearly visible and a poorly composed picture is still a poorly composed picture even if all of the technical aspects are corrected.
--
Brooks
http://bmiddleton.smugmug.com/
 
With Sunshine_boy......

It's hard to believe those bee pics came from a dD90 even with the 18-200. Those look like you took them from a distance and you heavily cropped 100% of the image you posted. Frankly, they do look awful. I think they are severly over-sharpened, colors are off, and contrast is bad. Composition is not far behind. Try to take the shot at an angle and not straight on to the bee. Isolate the bee in one of the thirds of the frame so that it is the main focus of the shot. Your bee shots are way too busy and distracting. Also, dont be afraid to use the flash outdoors in daylight. I'm not anything near a pro-level photog but I have a decent eye for good photos. Also, I too am learning technique. I do believe this was your first attempt as the photos reflect that. None of them really show me that you were trying to say something to the viewer. Read up on composition and learn how to use the right settings for different situations. Also, ease up on the sharpening. Use an Unsharp mask in PP to minimize that graininess. Hope this helps.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top