::Weekly Street Photography - march 8th part II::

5D/28mm f1.8 @ f/2.8

She does look like a dominant person.
It's interesting that her leg warmers give the appearance of black knee high boots and that she is wearing shoes instead of heels furthers that appearance. Her hair is also tied back instead of down which again, adds to that dominant perception. Even the fact that her cigarette is lit and his is not... Lastly, her look is that of a disinterested dom.

I now give you the same subject on another day:



--
bughunter
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography
 
You are really pushing the limits of your equipment! Interesting pic. Could you give a little more info about it?


Canon 5D Mk II, EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS + Kenko 3X PRO 300 DG
teleconverter, ISO 25600 -2 stops (EI 102400), 189 mm (x3 = 567 mm),
1/49 sec @ f/4 (+3 stops = f/11) (handheld, moderate noise reduction
on background only, no sharpening)

--



http://gcphotoblog.com

'if we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called 'research'.'
(attributed to Einstein)
--
bughunter
http://www.pbase.com/iangreyphotography
 
5D/28mm f1.8 @ f/2.8

She does look like a dominant person.
It's interesting that her leg warmers give the appearance of black
knee high boots and that she is wearing shoes instead of heels
furthers that appearance. Her hair is also tied back instead of down
which again, adds to that dominant perception. Even the fact that
her cigarette is lit and his is not... Lastly, her look is that of a
disinterested dom.

I now give you the same subject on another day:

Apparently the weather was too hot that day for her usual black leather playsuit.
(Nice atmospherein this B&W)

Ian I was wondering, would you make your watermark a bit less obtrusive -
a bit more watered down ?
It kinda spoils the image and a hazier watermark is just as effective I think.

Bye,



http://www.pbase.com/peter_dumont
 
------------------------------------------------------WSP 2009 archive------------------------------------------------
Jan 4th :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30556603
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30624046

Jan 11th :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30633911

Jan 18th :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30709789
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30771242

Jan 25th :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30780479
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30831247

Feb 1st :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30852890
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30892238

Feb 8th :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30932065

Feb 15th :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31004230
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31069425

Feb 22nd :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31084206
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31130049

March 1st :
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31160783
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31176773
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31221269

March 8th
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31233424
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=31246921
------------------------------------------------------WSP 2008 archive------------------------------------------------
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1029&message=30556517

 
of a rather well known portrait:



and I believe (which means I do not know) that the corresponding noun might

be magnimosity :), so you shouldn't worry at all - ever so often I do not understand what the real master of EL (you have mentioned him in one sentence with myself, but I'm NOT) might by saying in his photologues,

jpr2
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
wildlife, macro, B&W, and 'interactive' street:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341377106/
street candids (non-interactive):
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157609618638319/
Comments and critique are always welcome!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
...luckily for me... I can tear this pic. to a pulp with my critique, and no one
will be offended - sweet privilege of an author :), because, despite warm
prise, I still consider it rather poor, obvious, and of slight interest :),
and yes... it is a bit humorous too, although in a rather sad way,

jpr2
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
wildlife, macro, B&W, and 'interactive' street:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341377106/
street candids (non-interactive):
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157609618638319/
Comments and critique are always welcome!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top