What's your favorite lens?

Thanks for asking, parisphotog. I was more interested in your lenses
and what you used them for, but I take from your question that you
have a different favorite for each category of shot. Fair enough.

The common denominator of my photos is the stationary subject.
Statues, vistas, architecture, flowers.
For statues and flowers think about a macro lens. I use a 70-180mm macro but they don't make them anymore.
I'm intrigued by bokeh because I live in the north eastern part of
the U.S., which is old and heavily overbuilt. It's difficult to take
a shot without a telegraph pole, street sign, of pedestrian facade
intruding into it, so the bokeh would make much of that disappear.
There are in the curbs here, metal poles to keep people from parking on the sidewalk. So I have several thousand shots of great looking buildings with several thousand poles. The way I got around that "problem" was to use a 14mm which will let me stand between 2 parked cars and still get a doorway and 1-2 windows in the same shot. If you're not dedicated to color, doing a B/W conversion can sometimes make things "disappear" as when you do a general wide angle scene but people are wearing brightly colored coats.
Because I like HDR, I plan to take more ambitious shots of vistas,
I enjoy buildings too and my main lens would be a 17-35mm or a 14mm. With CS3 or CS4 you might enjoy doing panoramas with a wide angle lens. It's worked our really well for me.
 
Same here - the 17-35 is on my camera over 50% of the time and I am very happy with its performance.
 
I shoot portraits and I have the 85 1.4 the 70-200 and the 24-70 and
by far I like the 85.
Cheers
Randall
Concerning bokeh, nothing comes close...although there are coming more and more digital tricks to make better bokeh!
 
Depends on the use.

Portraits, people, candids-- 105 f2 DC
tooling around town- 28 f 2.8 AIS
Wedding/parties events- 17-55 f2.8 dx
and I have no idea what I'm going to shoot but I feel like having fun- 50 1.4D

Of these, I am repeatedly wowed by the 105 and the 28.

used on a mix of d700/d300.

next lens 70-300 VR

--
http://www.ricklarocca.com
 
Some of these lenses are as expensive as this
little D700 baby.
Right now, I'm crazy for bokeh and think the Nikon 85mm 1.4 D looks
just right.
... saving a lot of money in the bargain. I suggest a 50mm f/1.4 Ai - for about $100 on Fleabay (no need to spend any more on the Ais versions). The good news about Nikon is that the old manual focus lenses will work fine on the D700 although only in Aperture priority or full manual of course but as you say (and I fully agree), firing the shutter is only the first part ...

--
m.
http://www.pbase.com/m3photo
 
I know. I know. This is like when movie magazines used to ask
Tuesday Weld what her favorite color was. Here's the deal. I'm in
love with the D700, but so far, it's a fantasy love. I plan to buy
it, my first DSLR, between now and June.

I've had a lot of experience and fun squeezing what I once thought
were great pictures from the bridge cams (if that's the right word)
like the Coolpix 990, and recently the Sony H50. But now I want to
move up and am faced with the issue of lenses, something I never had
to think about before. Some of these lenses are as expensive as this
little D700 baby. Plus, there seem to be all different flavors,
denoted by letters like G and D and I'd have to go google the rest.

Right now, I'm crazy for bokeh and think the Nikon 85mm 1.4 D looks
just right. I'm tempted to just buy that lens and see where it goes
from there.

Also, and I know a lot of you gunslingers will judged me for this,
I'm a fan of HDR. My attitude is a photo only begins with its
capture by the camera. Post-processing is essential (and again fun,
as I know Photoshop for years now) to help achieve one's -- dare I
say it -- "vision." Anyway, I reject the purism of mere documentary
photo taking. So, anyway, that's who I am, and that's how I approach
photography.

For HDR, I like the braketing lattitude of the D700, yet I'm no fan
of the wide angle lens, with its claustrophobic distortion and
leaning buildings. I understand that the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8G is the
killer wide angle at the moment, but the samples I've found online
haven't wowed me. Those leaning buildings, still a nightmare by
Kafka to me.

I'm asking the forum members to tell me about your favorite lens.
Understand, I'm not asking you to pretend you're me, trying to
imagine what I need. I'm only asking for your personal enthusiasms.
Lenses you really enjoy and depend on.

Thanks...J.

--
TELL IT LIKE IT TIS!
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
'Like so many Americans,
she was trying to construct a life
that made sense
from the things she found in gift shops.'
--Kurt Vonnegut
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
 
And I was truly hoping for better. I prefer my Sigma 50/1.4.

Straight out of camera:

Camera: Nikon D700
Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/800)
Aperture: f/1.6
Focal Length: 85 mm
Focal Length: 84.8 mm
ISO Speed: 320
Exposure Bias: -1/3 EV
Flash: No Flash



--

 
Favorite Nikon = Nikon 135 f2 or the 200 f2

Favorite Lens PERIOD = Mamiya 150 f2.8 AF-D

-Pat
--
http://www.plovephotography.com

“You know, the camera is not meant just to show misery. You can show things that you like about the universe, things that you hate about the universe. It's capable of doing both.” - Gordon Parks
 
--
D700 :: D300 :: D70
Nikkor 200-400 f/4 AF-S VR ED
Nikkor 300 f/2.8 AF-S VR ED N
Nikkor 200 f/2 AF-S VR ED
Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 AF-S ED N
Nikkor 14-24 f/2.8 AF-S ED N
 
14-24, 24-70, 70-200

and if you have any money left, the 200-400 which is the best lens of the bunch, but weighs a ton ( cost a ton too).

The 12-14 is for wide angle shooting.

If you like up close or small group shots get the 24-70.

My personal choice would be the 70-200 VR. Excellent bokeh with nice and sharp images. The only drawback is its size and weight.

--
Peace,
Ez

'The difference between where you are today and where you'll be five years from now will be found in the quality of books you've read.' - Jim Rohn
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top