Forrest41926
Forum Pro
Supposedly, we see 24 "frames" a second. So there's your best shutter speed to compare to. When I look at a river or a waterfall, it isn't sharp, but it isn't particularly blurred, either. If you shoot faster than 1/24 sec ( say 1/500 with a flash ) you'll freeze the water, compared to how it looks. If you shoot slower than 1/24, you'll blur it compared to how it looks to you.
How bright the water is -- whether it's pure white, or a shade of grey -- is a matter of exposure, not shutter speed. If you want white, spot meter the brightest part of the waterfall, and overexpose a stop. This can be a challenge if you have sunlit foliage in your picture; you have to balance the exposure of the darker water with the brighter plants. But if it works, it looks great.
Here's my entry:
This was f/11 for 1/4 second, at 16 mm and about as close to the rock as I could get. It's not from an Olympus camera, but it was an Oly that tought me about photography and inspired me to take photos like this. The main challenge getting this photo was getting to the park -- 4,200 miles in eight days, by myself.
How bright the water is -- whether it's pure white, or a shade of grey -- is a matter of exposure, not shutter speed. If you want white, spot meter the brightest part of the waterfall, and overexpose a stop. This can be a challenge if you have sunlit foliage in your picture; you have to balance the exposure of the darker water with the brighter plants. But if it works, it looks great.
Here's my entry:
This was f/11 for 1/4 second, at 16 mm and about as close to the rock as I could get. It's not from an Olympus camera, but it was an Oly that tought me about photography and inspired me to take photos like this. The main challenge getting this photo was getting to the park -- 4,200 miles in eight days, by myself.