N
Niras
Guest
Can you provide any references to these stabilization tests? Is in body IS worse than no IS?Stop whining about in body IS. Ask anyone who's used in-body and
in-lens stabilization and they will tell you that in-lens
stabilization is waaaay better. The worst problem with in-body
stabilization is its worse in the tele end, where stabilization is
needed most! Newer in-lens stabilization provides upto 4/5 stops of
stabilization (see Canon 18-200mm review on DPR posted today) that
actually stands upto controlled tests compared to in-body
stabilization.
The cool thing about in body IS, is that you can buy old lenses (fx. 50 mm f/1.4) and get a really fast comibination. The new Nikkor AF-S 35 mm f/1.8 doesn't have VR.