Can the previous gen macbook pro (aluminum) handle Photoshop CS3?

HeyItsJoel

Senior Member
Messages
1,217
Reaction score
320
Location
California, US
I'm talking about the 15" all-aluminum build (including keyboard) macbook pro with matte screen.

Just wondering if it can handle photoshop CS3 or will it get too hot?
 
It's been running fine on mine for a year and a half now. I haven't had any heat issues so far.
 
Early 2006 MBP 2.0, 2GB ram. CS3 runs fine. As always I want more speed but it is a marked improvement over PPC Notebooks on CS3
No problems running on mine.
--
Tom Grollman
--
Gregory Eddinger
Those that believe they can, CAN, because they BELIEVE!
 
The previous gen can handle anything the newer one can. The previous gen had up to a 2.6ghz dual core proc., 4GB ram and 512vram? The previous gen macbook pro can handle CS4 as well. You don't know much about Macbook pro's at all do you?
 
Nope. I only have a regular macbook running Elements. I was fine until I took a digital workflow course and was spoiled by the Mac Pros they had with 30" screens.
The previous gen can handle anything the newer one can. The previous
gen had up to a 2.6ghz dual core proc., 4GB ram and 512vram? The
previous gen macbook pro can handle CS4 as well. You don't know much
about Macbook pro's at all do you?
--
 
Just hook up a 30" screen to your macbook and be done.
Nope. I only have a regular macbook running Elements. I was fine
until I took a digital workflow course and was spoiled by the Mac
Pros they had with 30" screens.
--
Sorry about my english, it's not my first language.
 
I have a MBP 2.16 Core Duo (not a Core 2) with 2gb of RAM and it runs CS3 fine. Is my Mac Pro with 10gb of RAM faster? You bet it is, but the MBP is just fine. If you are concerned about heat you can install SMC Fan Control. IMHO, the big advantage of the newest MBP is the ability to install 4 gb of RAM.

http://homepage.mac.com/holtmann/eidac/software/page5/page5.html

and/or buy something like this

http://www.raindesigninc.com/ilap.html

--

'The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone else
when we're uncool.' Almost Famous



Ron
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.pbase.com/recalcitrantron
FCAS Member No. 68
pbase supporter
 
Actually, the last two iterations of the MBP are able to use the full 4 gigs of memory, and actually, the last generation or two before the current version can handle 6 gigs.
--
Only my opinion. It's worth what you paid for it. Your mileage may vary! ;-}
http://www.dougwigton.com/
 
I'm running CS3 on a 2.2 GHz Core 2 Duo 2.2 without any problems. I upgraded to 3 GB of RAM but only because Nikon ViewNX is a memory hog and I wanted to run both apps concurrently. I'm also driving a 26" NEC 2690 on the native GeForce 8600M with only 128MB and it works fine.

Occasionally the MBP runs hot when doing processor intensive work (such as smart sharpening on large files) but it's nothing to worry about.
 
30" displays require dual-link DVI
Size does not mean a thing, its resolution what matters.

I drive my 42" 1920x1080 panel perfectly fine using my macbook white output.

--
Sorry about my english, it's not my first language.
 
Actually, the last two iterations of the MBP are able to use the full
4 gigs of memory, and actually, the last generation or two before the
current version can handle 6 gigs.
--
Only my opinion. It's worth what you paid for it. Your mileage may
vary! ;-}
http://www.dougwigton.com/
Unfortunately, I believe you're in error. The current (unibody) can see 6G if you put 8G in. I don't think any older ones could have 6G. (Though I think I remember someone getting an older mac laptop that was limited to 2G to see 3G.)
 
Perhaps I am, however there have been posters on here that state that they have gotten last generation MBPs to run 6 gb even though they are not "supposed" to. I stand corrected if this is incorrect.

--
Only my opinion. It's worth what you paid for it. Your mileage may vary! ;-}
http://www.dougwigton.com/
 
Actually, the last two iterations of the MBP are able to use the full
4 gigs of memory, and actually, the last generation or two before the
current version can handle 6 gigs.
Unfortunately, I believe you're in error. The current (unibody) can
see 6G if you put 8G in. I don't think any older ones could have 6G.
(Though I think I remember someone getting an older mac laptop that
was limited to 2G to see 3G.)
He's right. The previous generation can go to 6 gig and the 17" unibody can go to 8 gig.

http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/memory/MacBook/Pro/Core2/
 
Everything with a Santa Rosa chipset or newer will run 6GB. That is to say, Late 2007 and newer for the MBP. 8GB is not stable however, although it is supposed to work on the new 17 inch MBP.

Presumably Snow Leopard will further improve the support in this department. Though it should also be noted that CS4 is still only a 32-bit application, so can only use 3GB and change out of that memory total.

I'm personally waiting to see what Snow Leopard does to memory management before I go beyond 4GB, which I have found to be perfectly adequate thus far.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top