Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that's true, then it's definitely bad news. At least for me. When I unpack new camera, the first thing I do is sticking a hardcover shield over the LCD. I don't like the idea of touch screens in digital cameras. I can only hope that the touch-screen functionality does not replace the HW controlsPopflash says the R11 will have a touch screen.
--
Social Biking Blog
http://bikesocial.blogspot.com/
Agree fully with you on this and think a touchscreen is a waste but could be ok if you only use it to determine the focus point and scroll through your pictures in review mode. The rest should be done as it is now, the R10 is the perfect design for the R series.What I need
(and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone in this) is RAW and less
aggressive/more configurable JPEG processing.
--Popflash says the R11 will have a touch screen.
--
Social Biking Blog
http://bikesocial.blogspot.com/
Yes Tom, I agree that the touch screen is great thing for phones or umpcs. And yes, the touch screen and apple-like image browsing would be very nice addition for digital cameras too. But I think it would be a real nightmare for "record" mode. If nothing else, the touch screen cannot be used without looking at it. I mean, with HW controls, you can effectively use the camera even with LCD turned OFF. I really doubt you can do the same with touch screenI'm probably going to anger a few people here but i would like the
idea of a touch screen
I'll take the example of the iphone. I've had mine for nearly 6
months and constantly touch it all the time. The screen is not
damaged in the slighest.
OK, I would not object against the touch screen if it would be covered with glass (like iPhone screen) or at least hardened plastic (like LX3 screen). However, the majority if today's LCDs (used in cameras and other electronic devices) are not covered with glass or anything hard. Especially the touch screens with "old" pressure sensitive surface are very fragile. And this is what I'm worrying about. LCD alone is usually the most fragile and most expensive part to replace, so it asks for an additional protection. This is why I'm using the hard plastic cover you saw on my GRDIIPavel, you can still put a protective coating on a screen and be able
to use it but the ones you choose which are hard coated and sit quite
far away from the screen would obviously not work![]()
Yes, from this point of view, touch screen would be a very nice addition. But it must not replace the actual HW controls! I just hope that the R11 screen would not be larger than the current R10 screen, because this would mean even less space for HW controls and possible removal of them. At least is the R11 external dimensions remain the same as R10. Let's wait and seeI like phyical buttons for controlling a camera so my comments are
mainly for enhancing the playback mode.
OK Tony, now we are interested.There will be no R11.
Intriguing. If no R11 then maybe a new line - perhaps a cross between R10 and GX - which might give us 'RGX' with a 24-240 lens (a la Samsung), manual control but small sensor. Sometimes when one maker introduces a new lens there seems to be some collaberation through 3rd parties. Pure speculation, we shall see.OK Tony, now we are interested.There will be no R11.
No R11, but maybe an R12 instead? Or some new model naming system
altogether? Are Ricoh sticking to the 6 monthly release cycle or not
for the R series?
We can trust Tony Rose to give good information, but of course all people with genuine inside information are bound by non-disclosure agreements, so we just have to wait... and wait.... for a real Ricoh announcement.I'm very curious. Where is this info coming from that the R series is
finished? When will the replacement be announced?