I'm sure the UZI is a really nice cam and the 10X optical zoom
would be awesome to have, but I just can't get past the fact that
this is only a 2.1 megapixel camera. There seems to be other 5MP
non-Olympus alternatives, like the CP 5700 with a 8X zoom.
Mike . . . If you're gonna need lots of pixels for large prints,
etc, then the 2100 may not be what you need. You also need to keep
in mind that a camera that touts say"8X" doesn't say it all. In
the case of the 5700, the telephoto lens is equivalent to 280mm
IIRC. In the case of the 2100, its' 10X equates to 380mm. These
"X's" are simply multipliers of the wideangle focal length . . . .
not of the magnifying ability of the lens.
I looked at Nikon for a time and also learned that their customer
service is severely lacking compared with others. Also, the image
quality of some Nikon products is not always what you pay for. All
things considered, for me the UZi was about $1000 less than the
5700 . . . considering all of the overhead items I would've needed.
(I already have a 3040). Additionally, for some pics, I can easily
live with 2.1mp.
Keep pluggin' . . . .
Paul