Reading mode: Light Dark

the images alone worth the price tag!

Go to last post
Kaustav S Saikia

Kaustav S Saikia

Leading Member
Messages
674
Reaction score
6
Location
Kolkata, IN
Osku said:
a900 is useless at base ISO, D3x stellar...
Click to expand...
LMAO. These images look very nice -- and identical to Alpha 900 images.

I will bet you a thousand dollars I can mix and match 10 images from each camera, strip the EXIF, and you won't be able to tell which is which.
 
Kaustav S Saikia said:
I have used the 5d, D200, D3 and currently the 1DsM3 ---- nothing
even comes closer to these samples.
Click to expand...
If you had been hanging out on the STF forum, you would have seen a great many images that have exactly the same look.

And yes they are breathtakingly good. It's a fabulous sensor, both in its Sony variant and slightly tweaked Nikon version.
 
yes please, can someone do this for me.. i've seen some stella images on the a900 forums here, and makes me wonder.. i can kit up some very nice z glass with change left over for the askin price of the d3x.. i just called my dealer to find out the aussie $ but he left for the day.. ughs~!
MCromer said:
MCromer said:
a900 is useless at base ISO, D3x stellar...
Click to expand...
LMAO. These images look very nice -- and identical to Alpha 900 images.

I will bet you a thousand dollars I can mix and match 10 images from
each camera, strip the EXIF, and you won't be able to tell which is
which.
Click to expand...
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rexyinc/
 
I would punch my grandmother in the face for IQ like that.....The fat lady has sung the game is over....until something better comes along.....
Kaustav S Saikia said:
http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/camera/slr/digital/d3x/sample.htm

Just download the ISO 100 studio files : wow!
I have used the 5d, D200, D3 and currently the 1DsM3 ---- nothing
even comes closer to these samples.
I can only compare it with the Hassy 39 that I had used once or twice.
I think finally i will have to shell out the amount (I can buy a flat
AND a car for that price in India!)
--



http://www.photoshoot.in
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoshoot/
Click to expand...
--

 
Kaustav S Saikia:

Thanks, for the link.

--
BRJR ....(LOL, some of us are quite satisfied as Hobbyists ..)


Kaustav S Saikia said:
http://www.nikon-image.com/jpn/products/camera/slr/digital/d3x/sample.htm

Just download the ISO 100 studio files : wow!
I have used the 5d, D200, D3 and currently the 1DsM3 ---- nothing
even comes closer to these samples.
I can only compare it with the Hassy 39 that I had used once or twice.
I think finally i will have to shell out the amount (I can buy a flat
AND a car for that price in India!)
--



http://www.photoshoot.in
http://www.flickr.com/photos/photoshoot/
Click to expand...
 
MCromer said:
MCromer said:
a900 is useless at base ISO, D3x stellar...
Click to expand...
LMAO. These images look very nice -- and identical to Alpha 900 images.

I will bet you a thousand dollars I can mix and match 10 images from
each camera, strip the EXIF, and you won't be able to tell which is
which.
Click to expand...
I think that is highly unlikely. The a900 look is mushy and "plastic", at least those 10 JPG samples from RAW that I have seen (base ISO).

--
Osku
 
Nowhere does it say a Sony sensor, and no Nikon pro body has ever used a Sony sensor, so I wouldn't be at all quick to call this one Sony neither.

Especially since the sensor data isn't the same and Sony claimed their 24MP sensor to be Sony exclusive.
 
Osku said:
MCromer said:
Osku said:
a900 is useless at base ISO, D3x stellar...
Click to expand...
LMAO. These images look very nice -- and identical to Alpha 900 images.

I will bet you a thousand dollars I can mix and match 10 images from
each camera, strip the EXIF, and you won't be able to tell which is
which.
Click to expand...
I think that is highly unlikely. The a900 look is mushy and
"plastic", at least those 10 JPG samples from RAW that I have seen
(base ISO).
Click to expand...
Osku, you are wrong. they looks better than that.
I'm not going to plug here some a900 images, but you can search if you like.
 
According to Thom they say in Japan that Nikon leases a new Sony fab. So it is a Nikon sensor even it might have some common parts with the a900 sensor. So almost completely different sensor - as are the results one can see if has eyes. For those that do not see there are multiple options (buy new eye-glasses, buy new monitor...) at least on a DELL 3008WFP at calibrated aRGB the D3x files are stellar, and the a900 files I have seen are lousy - sad but true.
Daniel Roos said:
Nowhere does it say a Sony sensor, and no Nikon pro body has ever
used a Sony sensor, so I wouldn't be at all quick to call this one
Sony neither.
Especially since the sensor data isn't the same and Sony claimed
their 24MP sensor to be Sony exclusive.
Click to expand...
--
Osku
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Keyboard shortcuts

f
Forum
m
My threads
Mobile site
About
Editorial content
Cameras & Lenses
Community
All content, design, and layout are Copyright © 1998–2025 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved.
Reproduction in whole or part in any form or medium without specific written permission is prohibited.
When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
©GPS Media - Guides, Products, Services.
Back
Top