daryl.com
Senior Member
--Thanks for posting Terry!
http://www.daryl.com/2002 - photo calendar
http://www.pbase.com/daryl - pbase supporter
Olympus C4040
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
--Thanks for posting Terry!
I've been using the cloudy setting more often than not for outside and flash shots (Vivitar 285) and I like the warmer tones. I think it more closely resembles daylight film (memories from my silver halide light exposer days). If I remember right, the Vivitar flash has a color temp slightly warmer than sunlight. My experience has been that it works well with either setting, but gives a more pleasant warmer coloring with the cloudy setting.Bill_M,
...Since I set the WB to cloudy, I can shoot in any
situation and get acceptable results....very natural skin tones and
normal colors otherwise. Again, the amazing and surprising finding
to me was the great colors I get with flash (Vivitar 285HV)in the
cloudy setting.
Here's a sunset shot I took before the fireworks on the fourth with
the WB set to clouds:
http://www.pbase.com/image/2910242
I never knew that "cloudy" was the suggested setting for flash. Man, I am REALLY looking forward to trying this out this weekend.Yes, I routinely use that setting (6500K on the E-10) even when
there is no cloud between camera and sun. It's also the suggested
setting for flash.
A friend said he was told by a big-name Nikon aficionado (sp?) that
he MUCH prefers using the "cloudy" setting when shooting with the
Nikon D1X and D1H.
I fiugured I would try this out myself with my UZI (BTW, it
actually WAS a cloudy evening).
And wow, what color! I have enjoyed the UZI's natural color for the
most part, but it has paled a bit next to my Canon A40s vivid
default setting.
But the cloudy setting really made a difference in some pics I took
this evening. The color just jumped off the screen.
How many of you use 'cloudy' regularly or as your default? This was
my first time and I can hardly wait to try it in some other
circumstances.
I'm sorry to hear your test came out this way, Migel. But my camera has the same firmware as yours.I wonder if different firmware versions could account
for some having better color with their WB set to cloudy. My three
week old uzi has firmware version...352u-77.
----Thanks for posting Terry!
http://www.daryl.com/2002 - photo calendar
http://www.pbase.com/daryl - pbase supporter
Olympus C4040
Bill_M,
I do use it in bright sunshine! The only time I have had a WB
problem was when my UZI was set in auto WB. THe sunny setting
works fine in bright sun, but I get funny color casts in other
situations. Since I set the WB to cloudy, I can shoot in any
situation and get acceptable results....very natural skin tones and
normal colors otherwise. Again, the amazing and surprising finding
to me was the great colors I get with flash (Vivitar 285HV)in the
cloudy setting.
![]()
jim
miqel,
I see it too! You know what is funny....I have my pbase image and
my photoshop image open side-by-side and the photoshop image is
perfect, but I do see the greenish cast from the pbase image.
In PhotoShop I use the Adobe RGB 1998 color management color
profile. I wonder if that is the reason it looks different in PS
than on pbase. If you have PS, I'll send you my PS file. Hmmmmm,
I wonder what's up?
I'll tell you I do not see the greenish color cast on any of these
images in PS.
jim
--miqel,
I see it too! You know what is funny....I have my pbase image and
my photoshop image open side-by-side and the photoshop image is
perfect, but I do see the greenish cast from the pbase image.
In PhotoShop I use the Adobe RGB 1998 color management color
profile. I wonder if that is the reason it looks different in PS
than on pbase. If you have PS, I'll send you my PS file. Hmmmmm,
I wonder what's up?
I'll tell you I do not see the greenish color cast on any of these
images in PS.
jim
A friend said he was told by a big-name Nikon aficionado (sp?) that
he MUCH prefers using the "cloudy" setting when shooting with the
Nikon D1X and D1H.
I fiugured I would try this out myself with my UZI (BTW, it
actually WAS a cloudy evening).
And wow, what color! I have enjoyed the UZI's natural color for the
most part, but it has paled a bit next to my Canon A40s vivid
default setting.
But the cloudy setting really made a difference in some pics I took
this evening. The color just jumped off the screen.
How many of you use 'cloudy' regularly or as your default? This was
my first time and I can hardly wait to try it in some other
circumstances.
--A friend said he was told by a big-name Nikon aficionado (sp?) that
he MUCH prefers using the "cloudy" setting when shooting with the
Nikon D1X and D1H.
I fiugured I would try this out myself with my UZI (BTW, it
actually WAS a cloudy evening).
And wow, what color! I have enjoyed the UZI's natural color for the
most part, but it has paled a bit next to my Canon A40s vivid
default setting.
But the cloudy setting really made a difference in some pics I took
this evening. The color just jumped off the screen.
How many of you use 'cloudy' regularly or as your default? This was
my first time and I can hardly wait to try it in some other
circumstances.
The wb settings were actually auto vs cloudyAre you serious? is that really the comparison....? That is
insane...i hope to see the difference with my pics.
A friend said he was told by a big-name Nikon aficionado (sp?) that
he MUCH prefers using the "cloudy" setting when shooting with the
Nikon D1X and D1H.
I fiugured I would try this out myself with my UZI (BTW, it
actually WAS a cloudy evening).
And wow, what color! I have enjoyed the UZI's natural color for the
most part, but it has paled a bit next to my Canon A40s vivid
default setting.
But the cloudy setting really made a difference in some pics I took
this evening. The color just jumped off the screen.
How many of you use 'cloudy' regularly or as your default? This was
my first time and I can hardly wait to try it in some other
circumstances.