should I get a reflector (which one) or something else

joand2girls

Member
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Location
US
--

I do not know much at all about photography but I would like to get better indoor portraits of my 2 girls. The lighting in my home is terrible. I am looking for an inexpensive way to solve my lighting problem. I would like to use plain paper background (white and or black). Should I get a reflector? If so which one would work best? Or is there another inexpensive alternative that could work? I have a Nikon D60 and I have a SB800 flash (that I need to learn to use).
Thanks,
Jo
 
--
I do not know much at all about photography but I would like to get
better indoor portraits of my 2 girls. The lighting in my home is
terrible. I am looking for an inexpensive way to solve my lighting
problem. I would like to use plain paper background (white and or
black). Should I get a reflector? If so which one would work best?
Or is there another inexpensive alternative that could work? I have a
Nikon D60 and I have a SB800 flash (that I need to learn to use).
Thanks,
The lighting is terrible? Does that mean you have no windows?

The first advice is usually to shoot by the natural light of a window, and balance up the rather strong side lighting with a reflector. Indeed, because a reflector is so useful with any lighting set-up, not just simple ones, having one around is ALWAYS a pretty damn good idea!]
--
Regards,
Baz
 
A reflector is handy even if you don't have a flash. The shot below was taken (outdoors though) with natural light and one 32" gold reflector. (It is a 5-in-1 I picked up on eBay for around $20.)

Learn how to use that speedlight and you'll open up a whole new world. I don't know off the top of my head if the D90 has commander mode for it's built-in flash, but if it does, the speedlight and a reflector can go a long ways. Getting the flash off the camera is the key to good lighting.



--
Chefziggy
http://www.pbase.com/chefziggy/lecream

 
--
I do not know much at all about photography but I would like to get
better indoor portraits of my 2 girls. The lighting in my home is
terrible. I am looking for an inexpensive way to solve my lighting
problem. I would like to use plain paper background (white and or
black). Should I get a reflector? If so which one would work best?
Or is there another inexpensive alternative that could work? I have a
Nikon D60 and I have a SB800 flash (that I need to learn to use).
Indoors, other than window light, the obvious and inexpensive thing to create soft light for good portraits would be an umbrella. See http://www.scantips.com/lights/umbrellas.html for the idea of "soft", and the idea of the how to mount it. This actual umbrella part is both good and inexpensive. Umbrellas are the one "really good thing" for portraits, very soft light.

Since that umbrella is off camera, then you need something more to put the flash there with it. It could be a Nikon SC-28 flash shoe extension cord, but this is limited to only a couple of feet (else it will tip over the stands). The umbrella beside the camera (with a near reflector on other side) will still make a very huge improvement in your lighting. Or, the Nikon AS-15 PC sync cord adapter will allow you to use a 15 foot PC sync cord, but PC sync cords are Manual flash only. Many like Manual flash, but not everyone.

The best plan is that the SB-800 works great as a remote wireless flash in TTL mode, but your D60 will require a SU-800 commander to control it. Models like D80 and D300 already have that ability, but this must be added to D60 and down. This last however will allow you to add a second flash, to have main and fill lights, for wireless remote automatic multiple flash. Not inexpensive however, but very good, in two umbrellas.

Reflectors are great, but limited. About anything white works, could be a very inexpensive 2x3 foot sheet of 1/8 inch foamboard from the craft store, or it could be purchased nylon reflector. They will all work the same. The big deal is that they must be placed in the right position, which often means either a fairly elaborate stand, or someone to hold them. And that position is less obvious since the flash is not "on" at the time (with flash). And that position is fairly limited where it can be.

Reflectors are said to be "good experience", which is because they are pretty difficult to pull it off in many cases. Good, worthwhile, but just not very easy or versatile. For example, a second flash (in a second umbrella) is much easier, much more versatile, as you can put it anywhere you want it (instead of the only place it works), and you can set the power level to any level desired, instead of only whatever it does. But the reflector is a great place to start, until you know more what you want to do. For beginning tips for using reflectors, look on Google for: One Flash Portrait.

Backgrounds: White will always come out appearing gray, unless you can put more light on it. It is farther behind subject and receives less light there, which is gray. So it needs a separate and equal light on just it, same as the subject, if you want it to appear white. Black is a little hard too, as some light will hit it, and it will appear somewhat gray too. The "invisible totally jet black" appearance requires many feet of distance behind the subject, to keep all light off of it. Or velvet cloth works much better than paper, but is not inexpensive.

A gray background is often really good, because with an extra light on it, you can make it appear light, or dark, your choice.
 
--
I do not know much at all about photography but I would like to get
better indoor portraits of my 2 girls. The lighting in my home is
terrible. I am looking for an inexpensive way to solve my lighting
problem. I would like to use plain paper background (white and or
black). Should I get a reflector? If so which one would work best?
Or is there another inexpensive alternative that could work? I have a
Nikon D60 and I have a SB800 flash (that I need to learn to use).
Thanks,
The lighting is terrible? Does that mean you have no windows?

The first advice is usually to shoot by the natural light of a
window, and balance up the rather strong side lighting with a
reflector. Indeed, because a reflector is so useful with any lighting
set-up, not just simple ones, having one around is ALWAYS a pretty
damn good idea!]
--
Regards,
Baz
Well yes of course I have windows, but the light I get in most cases is not good enough. I guess I just want to be able to take your typical portrait photo with a plain backround and no distractions and have even lighting on the subject. I want some soft light not my livingroom bulb or my direct flash. I do OK outdoors and by OK I know is not professional by any means but good enough for a me and my family. I just want to do the indoor stuff instead of going to JC Penny or the like for crappy pics I can take myself.
 
Even indoors you can use reflectors to bring in more light from outside, right? Bring the SUN in from outside, thru the window and direct it where you want it!

white foamcor is inexpensive.

4x8' sheets of insulation from the home improvement store, with white paint on one side and crinkled/flattened aluminum foil on the other is better.
You have enough light. see it and use it
 
There is one other very possible plan which I forgot to mention, and which requires zero extra flash gear. It may sound far out, but it really is not, it is pretty common and a very decent plan, certainly for starters.

Your SB-800 is extremely versatile, and it has its SU-4 mode (page 84), where it becomes an optical slave flash, triggered in sync by light from any other flash. This is NOT automatic TTL mode, but is instead Manual flash mode M, except the SB-800 also has an Automatic mode A where the flash itself meters the light and adusts it power to be correct for the situation as it sees it. Which should work well, but you will have more control in Manual mode however. In Manual mode (camera too), you can adjust its power according to the results you see on the camera. It should be in an umbrella on a stand.

Then to trigger it, you could use your D60 internal flash, set to its menu for Manual mode at low power, and its menu for 1/32 power. 1/32 power really should be enough to trigger the SB-800, but would have little effect on your picture, compared to the SB-800 doing its thing at regular power. Or if a not a believer, you could use masking tape to tape a piece of aluminum foil as a shield to let the internal flash go up or towards the SB-800, but not towards the subject, and then maybe use 1/16 power.

This one umbrella with a reflector should allow really good results.
 
--

That is very creative and most definatley worth a try. I would be surprised if I can make it happen but will have fun practicing.
 
You really have all you need except good technique. Start with having a window for light and with your subject lit from the side or facing the window - assuming there is not direct sun coming through the window. Next try bouncing the flash off a side wall for fill with a EV setting of -1 and then experiment. That is what is great about digital is you can practice and there is no per image charge.

When reviewing your images in Photoshop first adjust the levels and set the black point to get a true sense of the quality of the image.

There are too many photo books about but I would look for ones that target using natural light or just a single additional light.

A 30" reflector kit with multiple slip covers costs under $50 from Adorama and is a good investment. It is much easier to work with a reflector to add light from below while your subject is lit from a window or other light source and to see in real time what the effect will be.

There are photographers who specialize in photographing children. Look at their website galleries to get more of a feel for how to pose or candidly capture children and the height of the photographer relative to the children, distance, lighting, etc.
 
--

Thank you soooo much. Such great advice. I need to get on and practice practice practice. I have sooooo much to learn.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top