No, not really pointless nor stupid. The MBP has way more power than
most of my previous computer systems that I've run Photoshop on
(since version 4).
You can do quite a bit of excellent, convenient editing, both photo
and video on a suitably equipped MBP. No, they aren't Mac Pros and
yes, the Mac Pro is in a different league. It isn't a Miata vs. a
F350 comparison, it's a .... oh well, enough pointless car analogies,
I'll save that for Slashdot.
A MBP with a separate screen (the built in screen is fair, at best)
works pretty well for single pictures from any normal (6-21
megapixel) still camera assuming that you don't put 15 layers in your
typical Photoshop file.
If you're doing panos, then you need to be patient or just get a Pro.
I often do 2-3 gigabyte panos. The MBP takes about an hour, the pro
about 10 minutes. I have a dual processor (four core), 12 MB Mac Pro
(new version), great computer. Running three screens without a
hiccup (take THAT XP!). Smoother, faster, better calibrated than my
17" MBP with 4 GB. But if I only had one system, it would the the
laptop - with an external drive for storage and a separate screen.
The only fatal issue with any laptop is the built in screen. For
serious color calibrated workflows, they don't cut it. The MBP
screens come pretty close - good enough for everything but print work.
The new 24 inch Apple screen has a built in mag safe connector - a
cool idea but I don't know how good the screen actually is. The good
news is that the Mac laptops work well and play nice with external
screens.
--
RG
http://www.lostrange.com