Not entirely. If I know that I will not market a product unless
(let's say)
x people want to buy it, and > x people respond positively, I
know that I am over-the-thresh-hold, and can go ahead. This is
regardless of their % re. y.
Your suggestion is of course correct, but read my lips, I am lazy,
...I do not want to spend the time to deal with all the
(multiple-restart because of the 150 post limit) threads that would
be involved with a bunch of PC user reponses.
This is only one of a number of photosites. If a given number , in
a given time, respond positively here, some interpolation can be
(roughly) done, to get at least a positive-or-negative "tone"
reading.
So far the positive responses have been acrueing at better than
10/hr(on a workday morning). We'll see how it goes, ...feel free to
do another one any way YOU want, if you have sufficient interest (I
would appreciate your not starting it until this one has run its
course, though, since I already "bothered" to get it going ;-)
Thanks,
Larry
Including a count of PC respondees allows you to guage the value of
the sample and determine %age factors. Knowing x of y respondees
use a mac says more about the value of the number x than x without
y.....
(BTW, I'm a mac user.)
Otherwise, the total responses or the "sample" is completely
divorced from any larger context like what %age of all mac users
bothered to respond and finally what %age of all EOS Dxxx users
are mac users.
The numbers will be meaningless without context.
Bill
But I don't want to count 4 million PC posts to find out what I
want to know, which is "How many Mac (etc.) users are on DPR?"
There are many ways to skin a cat. Anyone can start any poll in any
form THEY wish, Perhaps you'll let us Mac'ers do this one(?) .
That way you could get a percentage and extrapolate the total
number of users rather than just the number who respond to your
poll.
I'm a PC user.
Rich
--
http://www.flatarts.com/