The bag you've overlooked: Lowepro Orion AW

elmo

Senior Member
Messages
2,934
Solutions
1
Reaction score
151
Location
US
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks, have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps (for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2 smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L (hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a current listing: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option) is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
Dude...thanks so much for sharing. Not a bad idea. Haven't seen any good Camera Bag review sites. Would be nice to see pics like this....when I had my E-10...I totally lucked out. I got a Tamrac Digital 8 camera bag based on the specs. It fit the E-10, the Tcon 14b and the FL-40 very nicely in a compact bag. My D30 and lens collection has since WAY outgrown it. I picked up a bag at a yard sale the other day....but I'm not too sure I like it since everything fits in kinda loosely...no individual pockes like what your picture shows.

Hmmm.....not a bad idea.....something to think about for a website.
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

--
John
http://www.pbase.com/mankman
Canon EOS D30
24-85USM
70-200 f/4L
Kenko 2x Pro
 
I read your thread. Wasn't sure on the lenses. Maybe you could Ebay the 3 of them together, and get a few bucks out of it.

Thanks. Yes, it would be nice to see a lot of bags in actual use. I do know that photographyreview.com has a section for bags -- no where near as complete as the lens reviews. Maybe I add my comments there.
Dude...thanks so much for sharing. Not a bad idea. Haven't seen
any good Camera Bag review sites. Would be nice to see pics like
this....when I had my E-10...I totally lucked out. I got a Tamrac
Digital 8 camera bag based on the specs. It fit the E-10, the Tcon
14b and the FL-40 very nicely in a compact bag. My D30 and lens
collection has since WAY outgrown it. I picked up a bag at a yard
sale the other day....but I'm not too sure I like it since
everything fits in kinda loosely...no individual pockes like what
your picture shows.

Hmmm.....not a bad idea.....something to think about for a website.
 
I'll add to this with the best backpack bag I've found.

I carry a D30 with grip, 70-200mm L 2.8, 17-35mm L 2.8, 28-135mm IS, 50mm f/1.8, filters, cleaning suppies, 550EX flash, (sometimes my tripod with elastic straps on outside), ect. all in one bag by Tenba, model P261. I looked forever for a bag that would fit the D30 with the grip, plus carry my lenses cofortably, without being too big. Here's a link to their site http://www.tenba.com/camera/backpack3.htm

Easy fast zippers (heavy duty), loads of padding, pockets all over the place. An all around great bag.
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
That looks like a nice sized pack. Are you using their included tripod attachment sling thing?
I'll add to this with the best backpack bag I've found.

I carry a D30 with grip, 70-200mm L 2.8, 17-35mm L 2.8, 28-135mm
IS, 50mm f/1.8, filters, cleaning suppies, 550EX flash, (sometimes
my tripod with elastic straps on outside), ect. all in one bag by
Tenba, model P261. I looked forever for a bag that would fit the
D30 with the grip, plus carry my lenses cofortably, without being
too big. Here's a link to their site
http://www.tenba.com/camera/backpack3.htm

Easy fast zippers (heavy duty), loads of padding, pockets all over
the place. An all around great bag.
 
Where did you get the bag and how much??
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
Elmo...

Yes, but I have a big ball head on my tripod and makes for a heavy load. It will hold my tripod which is quite heavy.

The one side flips open and has a zippered net for items, little pouches, and a larger pouch with strap that holds my 550EX flash.

Mark
I'll add to this with the best backpack bag I've found.

I carry a D30 with grip, 70-200mm L 2.8, 17-35mm L 2.8, 28-135mm
IS, 50mm f/1.8, filters, cleaning suppies, 550EX flash, (sometimes
my tripod with elastic straps on outside), ect. all in one bag by
Tenba, model P261. I looked forever for a bag that would fit the
D30 with the grip, plus carry my lenses cofortably, without being
too big. Here's a link to their site
http://www.tenba.com/camera/backpack3.htm

Easy fast zippers (heavy duty), loads of padding, pockets all over
the place. An all around great bag.
 
Totally agree.

One of the great things about this bag/backpack combo is not only that it is very configurable, but ut doesn't take a lot of work to change things a bit. Tighten this, loosen that, and off you go :)

I've been using this one for about a year now, and have yet to get into a kit-lugging situation that it couldn't handle. I usually carry one large (D)SLR body, two or three lenses (with hoods) and some accessories. Never had a problem. Biking, hiking, you name it.

I Love my Lowe
 
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1019&message=3563680
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
Elmo, that's a great write up and the pictures add a nice touch... I was considering this bag myself. Small enough to hold what I'll have for the forseeable future, and well, I love Lowe Pro. I have one of their ooooold camera bags from the eighties, still - a Mini-Trekker that holds my A-1 and over half a dozen FD lenses VERY nicely. You'd swear it was custom made. Lastly, and I don't know if they're the same company - but I have a Lowe Alpine backpack for err, backpacking... Great stuff, and I'll highly recommend ANY of their products based on quality alone.

Thanks for sharing - and if anyone is interested, I'll post pix of my loaded up Mini-Trekker.
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
Yeah, I've got the original LowePro (one word, 20 years ago) belt bag, before they had gotten around to naming it anything. Lowe Alpine is (or was) the same folks.
Thanks for sharing - and if anyone is interested, I'll post pix of
my loaded up Mini-Trekker.
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
Thanks for sharing - and if anyone is interested, I'll post pix of
my loaded up Mini-Trekker.
Buying a bag is especially difficult if you live in the sticks,
have to rely on manufacturers' specs, and buy via net/mail order. I
am very pleased with the Lowepro Orion AW that I've had for a
couple of months, and want to share observations, and a pic with
actual Canon gear in the bag.

The Orion AW is a waist bag. I DO NOT recommend wearing it fully
loaded and/or on a routine basis. When loaded, it's not very
comfortable on the waist. But, I can't tolerate that much weight on
a shoulder for long periods of time, either. I wear it on my waist
when the body and a lens are out, in use, to keep my other gear
safe and handy during a shooting event. The bag can be used with
the included shoulder strap (the waist strap can be concealed), or
toted by the handle strap.

As configured in the photo, the bag holds a 35-350L and 70-200/4L
with hoods reversed, 24-85 USM with hood in working position (and
below that, the 1.4x teleconverter, beneath a padded flap), the
HUGE D2000 body, 420EX, spare battery. There are 4 pockets for
other junk. I did not use 2 included dividers with bendover flaps
(for putting body/lens combo lens down; not space efficient), or 2
smaller dividers.



The 2 L slots are the same size. My 135L and 28-70L also fit (hoods
in working position), and I'm pretty sure the 70-200/2.8L, 100-400L
(hoods reversed), and others will also fit.

Lowepro's AW bags contain hidden rain covers. This one's at the
bottom of the center/logo pocket. There are tripod straps at the
bottom, which also tuck away. Here's what I don't like: The bag
also includes an upper backpack attachment, which I don't find very
practical, and which I would rather not have paid for. The best
price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay. Here's a
current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464

If you like the bag, be careful when shopping. Lowepro's bag line
and names are confusing. Their Orion waist bag (no backpack option)
is NOT the same, and is not deep enough. Their Orion Trekker
backpack is NOT the same. And, there was an older Orion AW (with
backpack option) that was not deep enough for the L lenses.

 
This thread and some other mentions have really got me interested in the Orion AW. What worries me though is that it appears to be designed--and your usage seems to confirm it--to carry the camera without lens mounted. Seems to me that would be a real PITA. I like to carry my camera locked and loaded and ready to shoot. In fact, to me that's one of the many advantages of a belt- or fanny-pack style bag over a backpack. Any comments on this?

Thanks,

Nill
 
This thread and some other mentions have really got me interested
in the Orion AW. What worries me though is that it appears to be
designed--and your usage seems to confirm it--to carry the camera
without lens mounted. Seems to me that would be a real PITA. I
like to carry my camera locked and loaded and ready to shoot. In
fact, to me that's one of the many advantages of a belt- or
fanny-pack style bag over a backpack. Any comments on this?

Thanks,

Nill
I agree totally Nill, I can't imagine carrying a camera with the lens off. I use a LowePro Offroad 2 so I can leave the lens attached.

-john
 
I originally had the same desire. I actually have had the Orion AW set up to carry a 24-85 on the body. To do this, I did not use the supplied bendover dividers intended to allow lens-down orientation, mainly because that would be way inefficient on space. Instead, I set up a padded block with the 1.4x inside, which supported the lens, when attached to camera.

I did not stick with this layout for 2 reasons. 1) It still did not make best use of all the space in the bag. 2) Most of my shooting is with a telephoto lens. Almost every time I pulled the camera out, I had to change the lens, anyway.

We all know there's no perfect single bag. The Offroad and Toploader bags recommended by JohnM and others look like excellent bags for certain applications.
This thread and some other mentions have really got me interested
in the Orion AW. What worries me though is that it appears to be
designed--and your usage seems to confirm it--to carry the camera
without lens mounted. Seems to me that would be a real PITA. I
like to carry my camera locked and loaded and ready to shoot. In
fact, to me that's one of the many advantages of a belt- or
fanny-pack style bag over a backpack. Any comments on this?

Thanks,

Nill
 
Oops. Didn't find your post until today.

I HATE traditional shoulder bags, because they put too much stress on one shoulder. That's why bum-bag was essential. But, I'm not sure I'd want to wear this one, loaded, on a day hike. I used it for a few hours at a time, to work out of.
How comfortable is it compare to shoulder bag?

I uses EOS 3+PB-E2, 35-350L, 28-80 f2.8 and 420EX

I think it will fit perfectly into the bag.

Cheers,

jeff
Where did you get the bag and how much??
The best price I could find was $110, from Perk's Photo, via Ebay.
Here's a current listing:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1362689464
 
I use the LowePro Off Trail 2 myself, usually with a couple of Lens Case 4's sliplocked on the sides. It works fine, although I wish it had (a) an AW cover and (b) a large zipper pocket on the front. I guess I'll stick with that for now.

I would like something a little more versatile in between that and my big ol' Photo Trekker AW though. Maybe the Mini Trekker or Stealth Reporter 650 AW...

Nill
We all know there's no perfect single bag. The Offroad and
Toploader bags recommended by JohnM and others look like excellent
bags for certain applications.
 

Keyboard shortcuts

Back
Top