larrytusaz wrote:
I've lived for nearly 40 years
Are you fricking kidding me? When you say SLR, you mean 35mm. 35mm SLR has always been near the bottom rung of quality. It has always been: Once you got a 4x5, 8x10 view camera or at the very least a medium format camera, then you've arrived. 35mm has always been the camera used by the masses, and professionals that shot it in their field of work as a necessity and worked around its small frame size to compensate for its shortcomings by shooting fine grain 32 ASA films when possible which was rare. Plus X more common and preferrable and Tri X even more so.
[...and experienced how SLRs have always been about singular excellence
where it concerned still photography.]
I really wonder how much you know about photography. SLR has always been only the first stepping stone to those pursuing excellance in photograpy and a barely tolerable one at that. The SLR is as little as you can go and still achieve some modicom of control and excellance. It violated the tradition of photographic excellance on the first day its sorry existance made itself known to mankind. It did however bring some convenience to the world of photography, and we reluctantly embraced it because of that and only that.
I've lived for nearly 40 years
[Once you got an SLR, you had "arrived"]and shot with SLRs--film or digital--for 25 years, at whatever level
of excellence or mediocrity, and have studied and read and observed
and experienced how SLRs have always been about singular excellence
where it concerned still photography.
Once you got an SLR, you had "arrived"--maybe the photos weren't
pro-quality YET, but at least now you could no longer blame it on
inadequate equipment as being the reason.
Are you fricking kidding me? When you say SLR, you mean 35mm. 35mm SLR has always been near the bottom rung of quality. It has always been: Once you got a 4x5, 8x10 view camera or at the very least a medium format camera, then you've arrived. 35mm has always been the camera used by the masses, and professionals that shot it in their field of work as a necessity and worked around its small frame size to compensate for its shortcomings by shooting fine grain 32 ASA films when possible which was rare. Plus X more common and preferrable and Tri X even more so.
[...and experienced how SLRs have always been about singular excellence
where it concerned still photography.]
I really wonder how much you know about photography. SLR has always been only the first stepping stone to those pursuing excellance in photograpy and a barely tolerable one at that. The SLR is as little as you can go and still achieve some modicom of control and excellance. It violated the tradition of photographic excellance on the first day its sorry existance made itself known to mankind. It did however bring some convenience to the world of photography, and we reluctantly embraced it because of that and only that.